NH FAMILY COURT

REMEMBER YOUR NOT ALONE. Please contact your state house representative or THE CENTER FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES in NH. And watch SPEAK UP NH, who shows one NH Family Court case after another like Jamie Doherty's http://youtu.be/CIOXB21sBMY. You too can tell the public your experience with NH's Family Judicial Branch. NH's very own Family Court Records are proving that NH's Judicial Branch fully participates and supports Kidnapping and Domestic Violence; Real Estate Fraud, Mortgage Fraud, and Property Deed Fraud; Perjury, Falsifying Documents and Non Existing Issues, and above all, Obstruction of all Justice. Case file after case file showing all the evidence in multiple Family Court Records, that are filling the NH County Court Clerk Records Offices daily throughout the whole state! People are being visited by the FBI and THREATENED simply over a NH divorce case. You truly know the truth struck a nerve then. So become a part of the solution and bring them your court case file with your evidence of your experience with NH Family Court. Fear and Silence only continues to fuel what is already a corrupted government branch harming all those who pay their salaries. You are not alone. Numbers can truly speak louder than words!

Feb 13, 2014

THE TELEGRAPH INFORMS PUBLIC OF COURT TRANSPARENCY

The following is information from an article that people should be well aware of.  In other words, pay attention New Hampshire, because school is now in session!

THE TELEGRAPH

By David Barrett
Home Affairs Correspondent
September 5, 2013

Judge calls for more transparency
 
A family judge in England and Wales, Sir James Mumby, has demanded more transparency in the courts.
 
Sir James said, "There is a pressing need for more transparency, indeed for much more transparency, in the family court.
 
There are a number of aspects to this.  One is the right of the public to know, the need for the public to be confront with what is being done in its name.
 
No where is this more necessary than in the relation to care and adoption cases.  Such cases, by definition, involve interference, infusion, by the state, by local authorities and by the court, into family life.
 
 In this context the arguments in favor of publicity - in favor of openness, public scrutiny and public accountability - are particularly compelling.
 
Sir James added, "We must have the humility to recognize - and to acknowledge the public debate, and the jealous viligance of an informed media, have an important role to play in exposing past miscarriages of justice."
 
The remedy, even if it is probably doomed to only partial success, is...more transparency.  Putting it bluntly, letting the glare of publicity into the family courts.
 
...The judge made an order banning the name of a child, but refused to ban the publication of images.
 
The judge said, "the way the internet allowed easy access to information that was sometimes sensitive nature in nature, poses "enormous challenges."  The law must develop and adapt, as it always has done down the years in response to other revolutionary technologies." He said.
 
"We must not simply throw up our hands in despair and moan that the internet is uncontrollable.  Nor can we simply abandon basic legal principles."
 
"In July, Sir James published guidelines setting out thousands more court judgments in care and adoption cases that should be made public."
 
 

 
 

No comments: