REMEMBER YOUR NOT ALONE. Please contact THE CENTER FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES at http://centerforredress.com/. You can also contact SPEAK UP NH who shows one NH Family Court case after another like Jamie Doherty's http://youtu.be/CIOXB21sBMY. You too can tell the public your experience with NH's Judicial Branch. NH's very own Family Court Records are proving that NH's Judicial Branch fully participates and supports Kidnapping and Domestic Violence; Real Estate Fraud, Mortgage Fraud, and Property Deed Fraud; Perjury, Falsifying Documents and Non Existing Issues, and above all, Obstruction of all Justice. Case file after case file showing all the evidence in multiple Family Court Records, that are filling the NH County Court Clerk Records Offices daily throughout the whole state! People who have even been visited by the FBI and ARE THREATENED simply over a NH divorce case. You truly know the truth struck a nerve then. Contact the CENTER FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES. Be a part of the solution and bring them your court case file with evidence. Fear and Silence only continues to fuel what is already a corrupted government branch harming all those who pay their salaries. You are not alone. Numbers can truly speak louder than words!

Aug 23, 2015


NH Capital Song      

NH Capital Song

Bookmark and Share
Click on the photo above to hear Kevin sign a song he wrote for the fourth and fifth graders who visit the NH Capital. With the Help of Kiley O’Brien and Jarrod Taylor a Ron Paul supporter and Lead guitarist for the Ron Noyes Band.

Oct 22, 2014


Cartoon showing a couple running

It has been said that, "In New Hampshire, adultery is limited to circumstances where the spouse has sexual intercourse with a person of the opposite gender. The New Hampshire Supreme Court has ruled that sexual intercourse does not include all types of sexual contact.  The Court states that sexual intercourse is limited to sexual acts that could lead to the conception of a baby.  Accordingly, a homosexual affair does not rise to the level of adultery under New Hampshire law.  Equally, an emotional affair does not constitute adultery for purposes of obtaining a divorce.  However, an emotional affair which causes significant emotional distress to the innocent spouse may result in a separate fault ground known as “conduct to injure health and reason."  

Definition of Adultery:


noun: adultery; plural noun: adulteries
  1. 1.
    voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not his or her spouse. Extramarital sex that willfully and maliciously interferes with marriage relations; "adultery is often cited as grounds for divorce."
    "she was committing adultery with a much younger man"
    synonyms:infidelity, unfaithfulness, falseness, disloyalty, cuckoldry, extramarital sex; More
    informalcarrying-on, hanky-panky, two-timing, a bit on the side, fooling around, playing around, dirty weekend
    "his adultery finally caught up with him"
 NH Adultery Law:   No longer is a crime in 2015.

TITLE LXII, CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 645, NH RSA 645:3 Adultery - A person is guilty of a class B misdemeanor if, being a married person, engages in sexual intercourse with another not his/her spouse or, being unmarried, engages in sexual intercourse with another known by him/her to be married.  Source. 1971, 518:1, 1971, 269:19, eff. July 1, 1992.  (this law no longer exists as of January 1, 2015)

The important fact to this law was two very important words.  It very clearly defines the act of sexual intercourse as, "with another."  It very clearly does NOT state that "adultery is limited to circumstances where the spouse has sexual intercourse with a person of the opposite gender...that sexual intercourse does not include all types of sexual contact...that sexual intercourse is limited to sexual acts that could lead to the conception of a baby...and above all that, "a homosexual affair does not rise to the level of adultery under New Hampshire law."

"Another" is defined as, "One that is different and/or in addition to!"   Therefore very clearly covers all different forms of sex in addition to sexual intercourse.  And therefore also clearly covers the fact that a homosexual affair does "rise to the level of adultery under NH law." 

As of 2015, adultery is no longer a crime in NH.  NH also no longer has any law now of any kind that clearly defines adultery such as it did.  Once again NH only has NH's Judicial Branch's bias and prejudice close minded views on the subject. 

 It was clearly written over 200 years ago, to purposely remind and enforce people to have and to hold the highest respect for the art of marriage.  It was held in the utmost highest order by all walks of life back then.  From Poor peasants to wealthy people, to even people of government and of royal titles.  No one was immune from punishment if they committed adultery.

Marriage was so highly respected back then that adultery was punishable by public disgrace.  With penalties by having to wear marked clothing, or punishment with 30 lashes in front of the townspeople, to even being punishable by death, by publicly being beheaded or hung.  It did not matter what title or position in life you held back then.  You were simply punished if you committed adultery.

Today's statistics on adultery, along with NH's Judicial Branch's keep it simple stupid attitude on adultery, is simply out of control.  NH has spawned the past fifty years a new breed of people that clearly is of only atheist beliefs, and have absolutely no respect for the art of marriage.  

NH's actions the past 50 years on adultery is very clear and simply known today as, well, if I cheat on my spouse, they'll just simply rule it as a Non Fault divorce and a little irreconcilable differences by law and call it a day.  No penalties, No punishment, No harm, and No foul, in the eyes of NH's court records.  It's just simply another day in Mr. Roger's neighborhood. 

NH's Judicial Branch's records have clearly enforced atheist beliefs along with no self respect for themselves, let alone respect for the art of marriage, or the people of NH.  In the past fifty years, NH's children have now been born, raised, married, had children, and divorced, all before their own parents or even grandparents did. 

Statistics show for the past fifty years that more and more NH children are also dying before their own parents and grandparents by a family member or adult friend because NH Judicial Branch records show they cannot be bothered to use, follow, and enforce all the NH laws they already have at their means to properly protect them.

Records show NH's courts affect families daily, adults and children alike, by defining that adultery and other issues are falsely non existing here in NH to all families and children everywhere.  As Jesus already stated, just lusting after someone who is not the person's spouse is the same thing as committing adultery. 

 NH's Judicial Branch records prejudicially support not to respect all mankind and that we are clearly not all created equal no matter the gender.  Hitler's self righteous form of rules and thinking harmed many and even took thousands of lives.  NH's Judicial Branch chooses to continue that reign and do the same.  

N.H. reacts to Supreme Court gay marriage decision “Today, the Supreme Court has affirmed the founding principle of the United States of America that all are created equal,” Gov. Maggie Hassan said in a statement. “All married couples, no matter their gender, will receive the fair and equal treatment under the law that they so rightly deserve.”  It only took NH's Supreme Court a little over 200 years to even partially catch up with the law already in place by legislators.

 Definition of Cheating:
"Someone who is in a committed relationship  or marriage and breaks the trust of his or her partner by getting physically or emotionally involved with another person. Common forms of cheating include kissing, feeling each other up, vaginal, anal, oral sex and any other contact that involves the lips, hands, and genitals.

: to break a rule or law usually to gain an advantage at something.
: to take something from (someone) by lying or breaking a rule.
: to prevent (someone) from having something that he or she deserves or was expecting to get."
In 2003 NH's Supreme Court desperately even went as far as to seek and dust off a 1960's Webster dictionary (Not the law), to research, define, and quote the actual definition for sexual intercourse, in the 21st century, now to avoid any attempts of having to enforce NH's definition of NH's adultery law.  Again, no penalties and no adultery law charged.

Little did we know that NH's daft Judicial Branch still to this day simply received an incomplete in sex education.  We can also come to the conclusion that NH Supreme Court failed miserably in the constructive use of a Webster dictionary, let alone NH law. They continue to only teach us how small minds work in numbers. 

This major event was even proudly documented on record and took an entire page of the final divorce decree for Blanchflower v Blanchflower to do so.  the wife openly admitted to simply having an affair with a woman.  However, even after opening a dictionary, NH's Supreme Court still failed to this day to find the A's for Another, the F's for Fault Divorce, the L's for Legislators and Laws, but were only capable of at least finding the S's for sexual intercourse.  We can also hope and pray that they will one day finally learn that babies are not conceived and delivered to your front doorstep by a stork like a jar of classic pickles.

NH's daft Judicial Branch along with some NH's daft politicians are still insisting to this day, on telling the public that some people are simply confused with the NH Adultery law.  Exactly what is there to confuse?  That the dictionary actually covers from A to Z?  The fact that different forms of sex were clearly acknowledged even 200 years ago as adultery?

NH family court records show that they have been also supporting prostitution, polygamy without a license, grand theft, Welfare Fraud, all by allowing adultery to be committed, for well over the past 50 years.  NH's judicial structure continues to only design the domino affect. 

This is the excused see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil rule that's been in practice by NH's very own Superior Criminal Court Judge William J. Groff for over 18 years, along now with NH's very own Supreme Court for over the past 50 years.  Dominos will continue to be NH's judicial branch's favorite game.  

They continuously increase their numbers daily of more and more NH people with their children, to see how fast, how far, and how many will continue to fall like dominos, even to their graves, like a 9-year-old boy, Joshua Savyon. 

While under court orders, the boy was forced to visit with his father when the father previously threatened a year ago to kill both the mother and the boy.  The mother's fears were ignored by the courts.  The father simply pulled a gun out and shot his son before shooting himself killing both, while the Guardian At Litem was now a witness to all of it. 

NH passed Jashua's law in 2015 to prevent more of the same incidences.  However there still remains one major problem.  NH's entire Judicial Branch clearly needs an education first on how to legally follow NH laws before they will even legally enforce a NH law.  Joshua could very well be alive today had they done so.  Just adding another law for them to ignore or illegally transform is clearly not solving the problem.   It's just another proud moment for NH's Judicial Branch in Mr. Roger's nieghborhood. 

In 2011 NH statistics stated that their was a "58% increase in NH homeless families alone."  In 2015, NH statistics now proudly ranks the state of NH "second place throughout the country for the ages of 12 to 20 needing Alcoholic's Anonymous."  NH's dominos is still to this day keeping NH's Armageddon in full swing, that began over 50 years ago with NH's Judicial Branch still right at the helm.  Clearly there is no light at the end of NH's Family court tunnel if NH's Family Court continues to deny the laws that they are not suppose to change but only simply rule by. 
NH's Judicial Branch's see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil  continuous form of  laws and rules, apparently also permits NH's judicial Branch to even ignore all evidence that clearly requires any education to be read or calculated.  That is unless NH Judges can actually now smoke it, taste it, feel it, sniff or snort it, in only the 7 1/2 minutes they will allow you to present your case. 

NH's Superior Criminal Court Judge William J. Groff's exact words are, "I can only give you 15 minutes, I'll just cut you off when your time is up, so take it or leave it!"   When in fact court documents ordered 30 minutes for this hearing!  Fortunately NH's licensed medical surgeons cannot legally do this when your life is already in the hospital and just placed on the operating table.

NH's Superior Criminal Court Judge William J. Groff was the presiding judge over a divorcing couple's relief hearing in Nashua, NH, that was originally requested by a wife seeking temporary alimony.  When the wife's attorney told Judge Groff that the husband and his attorney were lying, only then did he ask, "Do you have proof?" The wife's attorney said, "yes!  A private investigators report."

 NH RSA 458:16 TEMPORARY RELIEF AND PERMANENT RESTRAINING ORDER SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (F) "Order Temporary allowance to be paid for the support of the other."   NH is known and labeled as a non alimony state throughout the country because statistics st
ate NH's Judicial Branch records show 97% of their court orders denying 97% of  requests for both temporary or permanent  alimony.  Also NH's Judicial Branch records show courts ruling that alimony does not exceed the maximum of 5 years.  Not your legislators or the laws they wrote state this. 

Therefore when one spouse commits grand theft from  10, 15, 20+ years of marital funds and assets, NH Judicial records show and proves it impossible for a single spouse to support themselves and pay back, in just 5 years, the other spouse's 50% due to them pursuant to NH law.  Again, here is a NH budget at it's very best.  Still need to ask why statistics show 58% of NH homeless people are entire families and not just individuals alone?  Once again, NH's famous game of Dominos at it's best!

SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (H): "Ordering the sale of the house of the marital residence provided that both parties have filed a written stipulation with the clerk, explicitly agreeing on the sale of the property prior to the final hearing on merits. (OOPS! Another NH hypocritical back door law especially if the courts final ruling is on fault grounds which is not decided until the final decree!) If the parties have not so stipulated, the sale of the marital residence shall not be ordered prior to the final hearing as long as the court deems the party residing within the marital residence to have sufficient financial resources to pay the debts or obligations generated by the property, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and ordinary maintenance, as those debts and obligations come due."  The second half of this law now completely deletes the first half which rightfully follows freedom of choice.  While the second half pulls the rug out from under you by immediately now stripping you of any freedom of choice in accordance to the constitution of the United States of America.   NH has had an illegal law on the books that allows the NH Judicial branch to illegally and fraudulently court order homes for sale that are not defaulted, as a 3rd party, who is not on the deed.  Your lien holder can't even legally do this unless it's agreed and signed by all parties in your contract.

Think twice and be weary of having any property investments in a NH marriage with your non investor, the NH Judicial Branch, a 3rd party, who now has all the say, in the divorce. No matter who's name is on that deed!  This is NH's 50/50 math skills at it's very best.  Still need to ask where NH's homeless families are coming from?  Or where your increasing hard earned paid tax dollars are going?  Once again, NH's famous dominos again at it's best!

SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (G) "Enjoining party from transferring, encumbering, hypothecating, concealing, or in any way disposing of any property, real or personal, except in the usual course of business, or for the necessities of life and if such order is directed against a party, it may require such party to notify the other party of any proposed extraordinary expenditures and to account to the court for all such extraordinary expenditures."  IF SUCH ORDER IS DIRECTED?  This order should not have to wait to go before the courts to maybe be directed!  It should automatically be the law to follow.  This is a law which is clearly ignored by all NH's justices.  Because court records prove they are refusing to read or calculate evidence and non disputed testimony shown and proven, that's been submitted on record.  Brosor v Brosor is clear evidence supporting substantial financial damage aided by NH's Judicial Branch daily, to a spouse by the other committing grand theft, that is simply and continually approved by court records, showing their support of this crime being committed daily.  Still need to ask where NH's homeless families are coming from?  Or where your increasing hard earned paid tax dollars are really going?

Without so much as looking at even one piece of evidence, the P.I. reports, a bank account statement or payroll stub, Judge Groff then says, "Well, neither one of them can afford the house!"  Apparently his  clock was still ticking while his mirror, mirror on the wall, who keeps falsely telling him he was the fairest one of all, was still not receiving any internet or Wi-Fi that day.  Probably even forgot to pay his bill again! 

His final ruling was to simply not only deny the wife alimony, but to now grant the husband's request, to court order to commit grand theft and property fraud, now to illegally sell her family inheritance mortgage free home (her half anyway because the mortgage was his half purchased from his sister-in-law that was never defaulted) for over 40 years, now the only roof she had left over her head.  This is NH's 50/50 math skills. Do you still need to know where all NH's homeless families are coming from?

The proceeds from the sale of the house, which the husband also received 50% of  in the final divorce decree, were then held in escrow until the divorce finalized.  Again, NH's math skills at it's best!  Apparently the husband still required means to support his prostitute's fees during and even after the divorce.  Clearly the NH courts will make allowances for that.  Judge Groff now was not only leaving the wife broke from a 21 year marriage, but homeless now too, to now live out of her car for the 2 years that it took NH to finalize the divorce, unless her family now rescued her.  The husband continued living with and paying for his prostitute of a mistress with 4 children by 3 separate fathers.

The only thing missing that day in court from a NH Judge Groff's performance, was a white painted face with a red rubber nose, and big red hair with a name plate of Hon. Bozo The Clown on top of his throne, with a 6' 6" tall bald bailiff called "Bull" now standing right beside him. Who now is not alone, passing out hot air balloon rides throughout the entire courthouse. Welcome to NH's very own version of the twilight zone.  Apparently these vampires will suck you dry to die!

Also in Brosor v Brosor, records show us that Mr. Brosor's lawyer, Criminal Defense Attorney, Richard C. Follender, also follows the courts lead and commits fraud in his practice by forcing and blackmailing the wife to sign the transfer deed to their Timeshare, with it only stating, that she was "signing of her own free will" without her 50% paid to her, because attorney Follender clarified, "it would not be legally acceptable with her crossing that part out and notating that it was, "court ordered" in the divorce decree", such as she did.  If a court order is not even legally acceptable on a transfer deed to a city or town, then what does it say for the court order to begin with? Their committing fraud! He then blackmailed her, charging her $450.00 to commit this fraud, and resend another transfer deed to be signed as is or, he will have her charge with Contempt of Court!  He agreed to take fifty dollars a month knowing she had nothing.  The fact that she was clearly not even one of his clients did not stop him.  Desperate times bring on desperate measures even for a lawyer like him who like Criminal Court Judge Groff lives above NH laws. 

Meanwhile during just a 3 month span, the husband had already closed all joint accounts.  He then drained an additional $23,000 from his 401K to cover $23,000 of his shared prostitute of a mistress expenses, that he whitened out all the descriptions/pay to on his checking account statement, just for a 9 month period alone.  His payroll stubs showed without the wife's knowledge, that he also was premeditatedly draining and banking his 401K for the past several years, very possibly supporting other mistresses.  This same 9 month period showed a cash flow of $7,000 already above and beyond his yearly gross salary that he stated on his financial affidavit, which was also $10,000  to $15,000 below what his pay stubs had yearly grossed the past seven years.  He also immediately transferred ownership of the newest vehicle. 

These same bank statements also showed woman's retail clothing stores and lingerie catalog orders, restaurants and movie theatres, ski lodge reservations at Loon Mtn, Ragged Mtn, and Sunappee Mtn, along with reservation reward charges of $12.00 per month on his credit card.  He purchased new clothing for himself and his prostitute spending $500 at a single location. He also spent an additional $3,000 in automotive repairs for the prostitute he shared with his coworker.

He was the big spender, again with his credit card,  at a Chinese restaurant, now involving and making his own 19 year old daughter with her boyfriend come out to eat with him, his coworker, and their shared prostitute of a mistress, now altogether while the 3 of them were still doing the "3 way love triangle."  Which is what Roger Brosor described and named it on the illegal audio recordings that he made of his wife, and admitted in court to doing so. (once again, the courts refused to press charges!)  This incident occurred before he caught the wife's private investigator and then suddenly filed for divorce 4 days later. 

New Hampshire Law - "It is a felony to intercept or disclose the contents of any telecommunication or oral communication without the consent of all parties. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 570-A:2-I.It is punishable by imprisonment of one to seven years. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 625:9.
However, it is only a misdemeanor if a party to a communication, or anyone who has the consent of only one of the parties, intercepts a telecommunication or oral communication. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 570-A:2-I. Misdemeanors are punishable by imprisonment up to one year. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 625:9."

This is what NH Family Court gives their full blessings on.  All NH Fathers should always educate and give their own young daughter's boyfriend first hand experience on how to really treat her and what to exactly do to her in a relationship.  Because if its good enough to do this to her mother, it's good enough to do this to her, making it a family affair.  

Another prior incident, was when his then 14 year daughter came home disgusted from shopping with him at Costco.  She immediately ran in the house and told her mother when they returned home that. "Dad stood and flirted with a Costco employee with me standing right there!", making her uncomfortable. She didn't care that her father angrily repeatedly said, "Stop It, No I Didn't!" His daughter would not back down and repeated herself, raising her voice too! The mother just looked him straight in the eye and ended it by telling their daughter that, "Your father would never cheat on me, that's something he'd never do."  That's when she knew she had to save money for a private investigator. 

Without the wife's knowledge, he immediately removed her as beneficiary off his $460,000 life insurance policy while increasing his wife's policy to 3 times her amount with himself still remaining as the beneficiary, all before filing for a divorce. The prostitute of a mistress with 4 children by 3 separate fathers that he shared with a co-worker, and then married, became then his beneficiary instead of his only adult child (That we're aware of). 

But in the end he did throw his only adult child that we're aware of a bone of a $150,000 life insurance policy.  Which he might have even of cancelled that too by now, if Mrs. laurie Anne Murry Nurnberg now Brosor has anything to say about it!  

Upon his death, his prostitute of a wife will get her Christmas bonuses of a half a million dollars, collectively paid to her for all her sexual favors, when all is said and done.   Apparently NH family courts are not aware that Cinderella is only suppose to be a fairytale that is suppose to have a happy ending.

He also had $45,000 in his bank accounts at the time of the relief hearing.  He filed for divorce 4 days after catching the wife's private investigator, then took a weekend getaway for 2 with his and his co-workers shared prostitute of a mistress.  He then cancelled the wife's cell phone to pay $274.00 to buy 5 new cell phones for his and his co-worker's shared prostitute of a mistress with 4 children by 3 separate fathers, all while this shared prostitute of a mistress was unemployed, on food stamps and other government aide, while now also applying for disability. Who already divorced twice, while having these 2 marital affairs throughout the 2 year process period of her second divorce, that the court took to finalize

 Within this same 3 month period, he lost the dated receipt for a $2,500 engagement ring so he says, agreed in writing to pay his prostitute of a mistress's church $7,800, then paid $600 for her children's ski club. He spent an additional cash flow of $10,000 just for December alone. He paid off his old credit card balance of $4,800 then opened a new credit card that he immediately racked up an additional balance of $11,000.  He moved in with his  co-worker's shared prostitute of a mistress a week after filing for divorce.  That is after his married co-worker had to now move out, who had filed for divorce first for this same shared prostitute of a mistress with 4 children by 3 separate fathers.  

He paid all of this above his additional expense of the divorce itself.  This is how NH budgets a 50/50 division in a fault divorce while declaring it as just a little "Irreconcilable Differences."  NH family courts have been clearly aiding all the illegal Roger and Laurie Brosors committing perjury, property fraud, adultery, grand theft, prostitution and now Welfare Fraud all right here in NH.  That is only if they haven't finished the job like none other, Pamela Smart.  Given that 71 percent of divorce cases today involve adultery and above all cheating, do you still need to wonder why NH taxes are constantly increasing?

Within this same 3 month period, he was also paying his prostitute of a mistress's mortgage which was in foreclosure and utilities simultaneously above the ones he had with his own wife.  All while this shared prostitute of a mistress simply continued to commit NH Welfare Fraud.  Simply by oops, not telling the government she was now receiving  not 1 but 2 married additional incomes of $80,000 per year living under her roof for months.  One right after the other, who now also was being supported by her government aide and food stamps.  All while they filed for divorce, now in hopes that one would marry her, once their divorces were finalized.  Well folks, one idiot actually did.  This being her 3rd marriage.  Do you seriously still have to question who the trouble making thief was in this marriage?!?  We clearly know what his motive was.  But in his defense, he already knew this is NH's Judicial Branch's way of doing things.

SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (G) "Enjoining party from transferring, encumbering, hypothecating, concealing, or in any way disposing of any property, real or personal, except in the usual course of business, or for the necessities of life and if such order is directed against a party, it may require such party to notify the other party of any proposed extraordinary expenditures and to account to the court for all such extraordinary expenditures." 

She chose someone else's husband of 21 years who had a daughter in college, who simply paid all her expenses over someone else's husband of 25 years, who had 1 in high school and 1 in college, who started to give her I.O.U's instead, all simultaneously while she lived off the government, and all only just for her sexual favors.  This is simply called now adultery, grand theft, prostitution, and now includes welfare fraud.  This is NH's Family Courts version of a swinging sanctimony design for marriage that's been in practice for over 50 years that is only just a little "Irreconcilable Differences" in NH's divorce records.  Considering they have all final say, where does this leave one of you in NH?

This kind of accepting fiasco behaviors, committing adultery, prostitution, grand theft, and welfare fraud, all within a marriage, aided by NH's Family Judicial Branch, has been costing your ever so increasing hard earn paid tax dollars in both, NH Welfare and Medicaid, in more ways than one, unnecessarily.  Again, that is if they haven't already completed the job like Pamela Smart did.  This by far is not 50/50 pursuant to NH Divorce Laws.  But this clearly explains the problem's with NH's government lacking an I.Q. in bookkeeping and budgeting skills.  And above all, NH's lack of respect for the law.

These types of real life NH Judicial Branch fiasco's have continuously been going on in NH for over the past 50 years, and now  in 2015 NH legalizes adultery when NH's judicial branch never enforced it when it actually was a crime to begin with.  So do you see the problem here yet?  This is also why NH's politicians and court judges will never be publicly disgraced on record for their own accepting practices of adultery.  Adultery is still currently a voodoo fault grounds for divorce in NH that has never been charged once throughout the entire state for the past 50 years.

NH Court Clerk Records shamefully support that nothing has changed since the NH's Supreme Court finally received an incomplete in sex education on sexual intercourse, from a 1960's dictionary in the 21st centuryThat is other than maybe now knowing what to use those black robes for.  So sorry to  burst the NH Supreme Court's false perfect bubble they made, but no, babies are not, nor have they ever been delivered to your front door step, like a jar of classic pickles from the stork.  At least it only took them until over 200 years later to document it no less.  They finally now are educated on what a man's penis penetrating a woman's vagina is called and that just maybe this is how to conceive a baby.

Because of all NH's Judges and Marital Masters history and continuous practice of, "See No  Evil, Hear No Evil, And above all Speak No Evil" Fiascoes and court rulings, has now caused enough greater reason and concern throughout the years, to force NH State House Representatives to step up, to vote to form a Redress Grievance Committee in 2010.  Shocked by the numerous court files, proving NH's Judicial System is changing federal and state laws, with no legal accountability to enforce against these actions, forced NH legislators to vote to dismantle this committee a year later. 

This happened due to the failure of CACR 26 in 2012.  It was clearly sabotaged by NH television and newspaper media, politicians old and new, and justices alike.  However it did not stop a small group to continue NH's Redress of Grievance committee outside the state house.  They are still presently continuing to collect NH court records, that are clearly supporting NH's Judicial Branch's illegal, and unethical ways of ruling.  Still to this day, NH's family courts are literally taking lives unnecessarily.  NH still claims to be an "Equitable State."  Family court clerk records that go as far back as more than 50 years, supports the fact that they lied!

CACR 26 Restores Legislative Oversight of Court
"In an op-ed in the September 14 edition of the NH Bar News entitled "Legislators Should Not Run the Courts," former NH Justice Joseph Nadeau and former NH Governor Steve Merrill recommended voting against CACR 26, a proposed constitutional amendment that will be on the ballot this fall [Appearing on the ballot as Question 2]. What they want everyone to vote against is restoring legislative oversight of NH Supreme Court rule- making that was lost when Part II, Article 73a of the State Constitution was unwisely adopted in 1978. They are wrong......When opponents of court reform like former Governor Merrill and former Justice Nadeau quote the language from Part 1, Article 37 of the New Hampshire Constitution that provides that the branches of government “ought to be kept as separate from, and independent of, each other, as the nature of a free government will admit, or as is consistent with that chain of connection that binds the whole fabric of the constitution in one indissoluble bond of union and amity.” they deliberately abuse the language to promote absolute separation between the branches when the Part I, Article 37 wording has the exact opposite meaning. The most important phrase within Part I, Article 37 consists of the words "as the nature of a free government will admit." It is a simple and undeniable fact that a "free government" cannot exist without constant and effective public oversight of ALL branches of government - including the judiciary. It is public oversight that blind allies of the courts always want to stifle, but it is public oversight of Court rule- making that must be restored in order to help restore comity between the legislature and the judiciary.

Since our present Justices all support the CACR 26 language that will be on November's ballot, I encourage members of the NH Bar to also embrace the amended language as well.
Rep. Paul Mirski
Enfield Center, NH"

NH's judicial system has illegally continued to change all legislative laws by writing conflicting rules to those laws written and passed by legislators.  Now to the point where the majority of the NH Bar Association is clearly completely ignoring any opinion that a NH judge has to say or give.  Thus, once again, NH's judicial branch playing their favorite game of dominos. 

In 2010, was also the year that State House Representative Horrigan presented a bill to no longer have Adultery as a crime.  He stated that the state's government has no business regulating what 2 "consenting" adults do with one another.  Well just because 2 adults "consent" to do something with one another, still does not make it right or legal. 

However, it is also State House Rep. Horrigan who believes that people on government aide, should be allowed the right to purchase fire arms with their EBT Food Stamp Cards, if they "consent" to need one for safety.  Well I for one, along with the coworker's wife, are very grateful that fire arms cannot simply be purchased and financed with a government EBT Food Stamp Card, given to what my ex husband's prostitute of a mistress was very capable of doing to others, all while already being supported by the state of NH.   The adultery bill failed in 2010.  We also now have others who have been still arguing that adultery is a moral issue and not a legal issue.   

Many people have truly forgotten the real purpose for having laws and rules in the first place.  All laws and rules in this country have always been, and will always be, on what was perceived to be morally based first, on a right from wrong to any living being and humanity.  Secondly, people have also clearly forgotten that as long as our government has any say in morally regulating any laws and rules pertaining to our marriage licenses and divorce decrees, proves our government has already been, and will always be in the business of morally regulating, our bedrooms, sex lives, and love lives, whether 2 adults are "morally consenting" or not.  Thirdly, NH's judicial branch of government needs to stop not "morally consenting" to doing the jobs they were morally entrusted to do, and actually "morally consent" to do the jobs they were actually morally delegated to do.  To simply follow and enforce the legislative laws of this country and NH state.

The NH Grievance Committee was clearly very much needed because their findings now not only supported clear cut evidence that not only did NH's Judicial Branch break NH's legislative laws, but also now supported evidence, that the NH Judiciary Conduct Committee, the NH Bar Association Dispute Resolution Committee, and last but never shall be the least, the NH Supreme Courts Attorney Discipline Office, have all been only aiding and protecting their own kind!  So why stop the domino's there NH?  NH might as well just go to NH State Prisons, choose a few convicts, such as Pamela Smart for one,  just throw black robes on them, then place them behind a courtroom bench!
NH Article 73-a (1978)
"[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts. The rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law."   

In 2011, 33 years later, not only did NH's Judicial Branch still continue to simply but literally commit the crimes, but was now actually simply still documenting the crimes as "The rules (They write) so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law", literally stating the crimes they choose to commit are now their laws to follow.  The following is a statement/rule initially written with complaints that initially raised many eyebrows once it was pointed out.

The new mandatory Family Division Self Disclosure rule article 1.25a written by NH's king court, the NH Supreme Court.  You will notice that this trend is simply becoming the new kind of martial law in NH.   NH's Judicial Branch gives a whole new meaning to "keep it simple stupid."

"2. The parties may redact (edit) all but the last four digits of any account numbers and social security numbers that appear on any statements or documents."

However, it simply is (OOPS!) against NH's law Title LXII Criminal Code Chapter 638 Fraud, Section 638:3 Tampering With Public or Private Record, and it even simply illegally goes (OOPS!) against the United State's Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1505 : US Code - Section 1505: Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.
New Hampshire Statute



Forgery and Fraudulent Practices Generally
Section 638:3
"638:3 Tampering With Public or Private Records. – A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if, knowing he has no privilege to do so, he falsifies, destroys, removes or conceals any writing or record, public or private, with a purpose to deceive or injure anyone or to conceal any wrongdoing."  

Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973."
18 U.S.C. § 1505 : US Code - Section 1505: Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees 

"Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits; or Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress -Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both." 

Oh what the hell, screw the laws in this country, because NH's OOPS Supreme Court simply does while the NH people are paying over $100,000 yearly per judge in NH!  This is just a sample on how criminals/NH Judicial Branch brakes the NH laws and rules throughout the state.  NH has now legalized adultery to be committed for another 50 years, because according to NH's famous adulterating, welfare fraud prostitute, Mrs. Laurie Anne Murry Nernburg now Brosor, my ex husband, Roger R. Brosor and his attorney, Richard C. Follender, the NH Family and Criminal Courts accepting defense for NH adulterating, welfare fraud committing prostitutes, is that they are being treated now by NH's Alanon's 12 step programs, for marital counseling with sex addiction, for those sex addicts who are repeat offenders committing adultery throughout NH.  The simple truth is that she is a recovering alcoholic needing AA for a purpose. She was also diagnosed as Bipolar. 

Why it's so acceptable for NH's married men to commit grand theft just to pay for sexual favors from a prostitute of 4 children by 3 separate fathers, above the responsible lives of their own children and spouses, and a mother/father of those children in NH, is clearly disgusting to say the least. But on record, NH's criminal court clearly approves of all of it. 

Survival of the living begins and ends with the almighty dollar in this world.  Multiple daily attempts of murder simply aided by NH's Family Court system needs to cease and desist immediately.  Adulterating NH fiascoes have been going on daily in NH long before Pamela Smart and Laurie Anne Murry, Nurnberg now Brosor.  Again, only ever so simply aided daily by NH Family Courts and Criminal Courts alike.

My ex began going to weekly AA meetings after he was introduced to his shared prostitute of a mistress by his co-worker, who was also going to these same AA meetings during his own affair with his and my ex's same shared prostitute of a mistress.  This same shared prostitute of a mistress also had these husbands HIV tested, that is after they already had sex with her.  Then she sent the results to the wife with a note saying, "I have the originals for safe keeping you know how to reach me" (How thoughtful).  And yes, there are records on all of this.  Do you still need to ask why NH's society is second place in the nation needing AA.

To all NH wives,  Roger and Laurie Brosor, with above all the NH Supreme Court have clearly taught us a strong lesson. For the need to still use protection within your own marriages, now in the 21st century.  My deepest sympathy's to Richard Follender's wife, if he should still have one.  I pray for her everyday.  One thing for sure is that, NH's family courts accepting defense on NH sex addicts committing adultery proves that both sex addiction and the sanctimony in marriage in NH society has seriously gone straight to hell in a hand basket.  This is all just simply a little "Irreconcilable Differences" and that's all it will ever be in NH Family Courts. 

Since NH is known as a non taxable state, NH should just simply list polygamy without a license at NH's unemployment offices, as a tax free self employed income.  It would clearly be at the top of the list along with prostitution, grand theft, and committing Welfare Fraud. NH law clearly state's that "the capability for future acquisition is considered for both party's" in the divorce.

Well clearly this did not mean a married spouse with their shared prostitute of a paramour.  But then again, the NH justices along with a majority of NH lawyers such as Richard C. Follender continue to just keep it simple stupid.  This is how its simply done in NH.  For the little whore house is truly no longer just in Texas anymore.  NH Family Court records very simply has supported attempted murder, adultery, prostitution, grand theft, property fraud and welfare fraud for over 50 years!  Seriously, how much more can 1 judicial branch cost the state of NH and above all your tax dollars in the process?  Seriously, you don't want to be the one finding out the way I did!

Step 1. If you receive a letter from a stranger like this one, run to a lawyer as fast as you can and file for divorce!

May 11, 2007
"Dear Jean,

You don’t know me, my name is Laurie Nurnberg (NOW BROSOR). My children and I are friends with Roger. I met Roger through one of his co-workers. I’m writing in hopes of easing your mind in regards to my friendship with Roger. I tell you the honest truth when I say that Roger and I are good friends.(SHE STATES, "GOOD FRIENDS" INSTEAD OF "JUST FRIENDS!") Sometimes when I here Roger share his concerns, it seems to me that you’re wondering if our friendship is more than it is? I promise you that it is strictly and mutually platonic.

I respect and admire your husband, he’s a wonderful guy with great morals and values, pride and honor. As well as many god given talents and gifts as I’m sure you’re aware of. We truly are blessed to have him as a friend.

(That pedestal she has him on is so high, its beginning to lack oxygen! “Great morals and values?” Who the hell does she think she's kidding? Honey, remember it's me, THE WIFE! I was married to the man for 20 ½ years!)

Roger shown me pictures of and talks about the work he has done in your home. "HE" seems to really poor "HIS" heart into all that "HE" does. He is proud of your decorating skills and gives you all the credit. I’m sure you appreciate all "HIS" hard work. I know I do. "HE" worked hard and did an outstanding job on my wood floors. I owe him a world of gratitude.

I heard so much about and have seen pictures of your daughter. What a beautiful girl the two of you raised. "ROGER" is very proud of her academic and the young woman that she has become. My girls are 12 & 10. The boys are 16 & 10. I have a ways to go still.         

(As the saying goes, "So shall suffer the little children.") 

Jean, I know that you’re concerned about Roger sharing with me about his concerns at home in general. I can appreciate how you must feel. I think we all wonder if people dislike us based on what they have heard about us and what they believe is true. I can honestly say that I am a loyal friend to "ROGER" and I have genuine concern for you as a family. I want you to know that I’m not judging you. I don’t create opinions based on what I’m told; I like to meet people and get to know them. Men just don’t seem to have the gift of words like most of us woman do. When I was going through my divorce I was very scared that my husband didn’t love me anymore, therefore I was unlovable. Not true, he and I did love one another, we just spent our time hurting each with words and actions trying to prove the other wrong and ourselves right. In the end the only right answer would have been to have open and honest communication together with a qualified or pastor. But my husband didn’t have the courage to share his true thoughts and feeling out of fear and rejection.

I admire Roger for being such a devoted father and husband. "He" is a better person than I am. I remember speaking very poorly about my other half when we were having hard times. I called him names; I exaggerated my truth of the situation and simply was mean and unloving when I spoke of him to others. Roger is different. He never has anything negative to say about anyone. "HE" states how "HE" feels about curtain situations as "HE" sees it without disregard to others. A quality I am working on adopting. I am learning a lot from just speaking to him and hearing stories that "HE" shares and the projects either personally or at work.

(You really should give yourself more credit! Actually, he truly isn’t any more better than you are! But to call this man a “devoted father and husband?” No wonder you have been through 2 husbands so far and counting!)

Jean, I hope you and Roger don’t resent me telling you this but I would like to share my thoughts in hopes of helping, not hurting the two of you. (Then what exactly was the first half of this ridiculous Letter about?) I truly believe that Roger loves you and is searching for answers how to either mend or end your marriage. I also believe it is very hard by not impossible to share his feelings and emotions.

In retrospect I wish I would have put ¼ of my energy into treating my husband the way that I wished he would have treated me, with respect an dignity instead of hiding behind fear and anger. I built up a wall so high around my heart made up of past hurts not forgiven, that my husband chose to give up and walk away rather than to “Talk it out.” My stored up pain and anger scared him away from our marriage because it was all that I ever showed him.

It wouldn’t have killed me to be kind and sensitive to him even though I thought for sure that I was right and he was wrong. My ego and pride constantly kept the fight going but instead of winning the battle I lost my first love. It’s too late and to much pain has been inflicted to mend our relationship but what I wouldn’t have given to have the knowledge I know now back then. Our choices left us with a broken home, broken promises, and a broken heart.

(If one word in this letter was actually genuine then what about the promises, hearts, and homes you later moved onto and played a part in destroying afterwards! What exactly did you learn from that?)

I learned that love is a gift from god and it’s free to all who seek it. Love is a choice. You have to have courage to be open and intimate. You have to risk pain and rejection in order to know if you are two people committed to honesty and each other.


I’m hopeful for you and Roger because “HE” genuinely cares for all “HE” has worked to hard to build; the marriage, the home, “HIS” career and your daughter’s future not to mention your future.

(Now that pedestal is seriously beginning to CRACK, and at a very dangerous altitude I might add! If this is how a man works hard for his daughter and wife, then no thanks! This was the point where everything in me said run like hell, he’s all yours honey! I pulled out the yellow pages and began looking for Lawyers!)

I hope you feel better knowing that Roger and I are only friends and that someday soon I look forward to meeting and becoming friends with you too if you wish.

Roger may have mentioned Rockingham Christian Church in Salem NH. I love it there; it’s casual, friendly and upbeat. The people are not pushy or snobby and no one will require anything of you or put you on the spot. (Adultery is a minor little thing that will be overlooked in RCC while she was previously told to leave with her 4 children by Londonderry Christian Church, never to return, because of her adultery with a married parishioner, who was the co-worker! Only in NH folks, only in NH!  Still with me so far?) Their music ministry is out of this world in my opinion. I think you would enjoy it too. Maybe we will meet there someday. That would be great!

I’m sending you a CD of the last 3 church services, which was “on the family,” good stuff in case you’re interested. Thank you for your time, enjoy the beautiful weather this weekend. (Because what's left?...You already had my husband every weekend for the past 3 months!...Oh, but you already knew that now didn‘t you!) Take care.

Talk about an average everyday compulsive liar. Written on The CD that she refers to as "on the family" was titled in Bold Green Marker, "WIFE SWAP" IN ALL 4 CORNERS OF THE CD JACKET! The CD itself had, "WIFE SWAP BUILD" WRITTEN ON IT! The following statements were made about me in emails written by Laurie to her married ex lover, who was my husband's co-worker and friend! Remember, I never met or spoke with this women once during these emails.

STEP 2. You will then find emails and voicemails telling you how this stranger really feels about you.

* “You and all that she comes into contact with should be angry for being used by her to pull you down in the mud with her. Don’t let her have your energy, she is a vamp and only lives to destroy others.”

* “I have been vengeful just like you and Jean are being right now towards Roger and I.” (You Think?)
* “Just because you don’t get your way you would use another extremely sick and vulnerable woman.” (Gee, Who Is The Other One!)
* “She is very sick and any involvement with her once again puts you and your family at risk.” (spoken by a true professional with hands on experience)
* “You helped Jean the Queen of Killer Bees go to battle.” (Gotta Love This One!)

* “You have helped a very destructive and sick woman.”

So much for, "Roger is different. He never has anything negative to say about anyone." And for Ms. Laurie Murray Nurnberg now Brosor's “HONEST TRUTH” stating, “I promise you that it is strictly and mutually platonic.....I don’t create opinions based on what I’m told; I like to meet people and get to know them.”

What NH says is "IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES" in a divorce, is anything but that! Can you say, Bribery, Witness Tampering, and let's just throw Obstruction Of Justice out there too! The following are emails that were submitted as supporting evidence to my private investigators report in my divorce. 


"I can tell that you want to be able to have me believe that you love me and that being at work having this conversation isn't doing it.

I know and respect that your hands are tied financially, that's not it. (SURE! She needs medical coverage, and to house, feed, clothe 4 children and herself, while being unemployed, applying for disability, while having sex with multiple married men, and already on government aid and food stamps, while her house is in foreclosure!...00PS! Then she was investigated for Welfare Fraud for not telling them about the additional $80,000 married yearly income living under her roof, that she received and supported with her government aid, while they were divorcing their wives to marry her! Still with me so far? Believe me, boy do I know how difficult to keep up with all of this is!  Only in NH folks, only in NH!) We shouldn't even be living together even if we were OK which we are not. What hurts the worst is that you aren't there for me. You always leave, walk away, go unavailable. I'm going through some tough stuff right now and are you the ones supporting me emotionally and thinking things through with me, telling me it's all going to be alright and I'm making the right choices? NO, Roger is!

I don't even feel like I can share with you how I feel about you and I without running away. Hell, Here I am, the stupid dependent enabler begging to be loved. How pathetic am I? I always choose Mr. Unavailable, that's you, you are so unavailable it isn't funny yet I cry for and miss you and somewhere deep in my heart I can't give up on you, I won't allow myself to believe that you are never coming to me. That's called denial. When I'm with you I feel great and hurt at the same time. When I'm around Roger things are just simple and I have a friend to talk to, laugh with and get stuff done.

Why can't you be that with me? Why do I have another married man just waiting to use me to end his shitty marriage? Will I let Him?             (here's "My ego and Pride" thing again!)



"You are a hurting person and I forgive and ask for forgiveness from you for the past hurts to one another. I know that you have court tomorrow and I wish you well and I am praying that Gods grace is with you and you make the right choices for you and your family concerning your marriage.

I own my part in damaging your marriage. No one made me do what we did, I chose to go there freely. I would erase it and all the pain that I have caused if I could but I know I can't. I want you to know that I really truly did love you and I wanted to believe in you so bad that it felt impossible to give up. I had no business in your world and I didn't push you away hard enough.

I now get it. My power is in my beauty and by being emotionally available is how I allured you and others and by not shutting you down the moment I saw your interest is where I went wrong and you couldn't control yourself. I now know that I have that effect on men and that it is powerful.     (Here's "My ego and pride" Thing again.)

Roger and I had a long talk today after church and we have decided to love one another only as friends. I won't do to him and his family what I did to you and yours.  (Seriously now, REALLY?!?)  I want to learn from my mistakes so that I can own my power and use it for good.

You were my second experience with attracting an addict who couldn't say no to me and my seductive ways. (Definitely "My ego and pride" thing again.)The more you poured on the charm, the more you baited me, the more I wanted to believe the lies that told yourself and me until I gave myself permission to sleep with you and fall in love with you. You already knew that I was vulnerable and needy and that given the right attention I would crack eventually. That's where God came in. You knew that if I believed that you had changed and you wanted the same things spiritually that I wanted that I would not be able to walk away and stand on my own. I thought that I had finally found what I was always looking for.

Today at RCC was an all kids lead worship. I thought of you and our dreams and how we met and how far this all got out of control and how I loved you and the promises I made to you in my own heart and I instantly knew that I needed to heal from all of this and (her 2nd ex husband). I knew that I couldn't and wouldn't do this to my sweet friend Roger.   (Again, seriously now, REALLY?!?)

I learned about my power as a woman through you and Roger and I have I hope become a better person because of the experiences I am looking squarely at myself, my mistakes, my past behaviors and my denial and I am analyzing all of it with full honesty. It is an ugly, disgusting mess. I fail so deeply at being a good person. I know that I am now failing you, hurting you, but I have to let you go. You need to have all the experiences you need to have in order to learn and I know that you are on the road of enlightenment and you will come out of this wiser. God loves you. His grace is sufficient and he is strongest when we are at our weakest. I admit that I am completely leaning on my Savior to get through. I hope you are too.

I sincerely apologize for hurting you. I had no business commenting about you being abusive because I too have been abusive in my behaviors and you have not been more wrong or bad than I. God loves and forgives us both and I praise him in the highest for that fact.

May God bless you tomorrow and always, please forgive me.

All to him,


In April 2010, it was made public knowledge by Rockingham Christian Church that Laurie Ann Brosor participated in a pastoral care training and certification program called "PALM," "Pastoral Authorized Lay Ministry" at the New England Pastoral Institute in Salem, NH, and has now been announced to the church as a knowledgeable Spiritual and Emotional Guide for those in need, within the church and the community.  This is NH society's response to adultery now in the 21st century.  As Jesus already stated, just lusting after someone who is not the person’s spouse is the same thing as adultery.

This prostitute went to the co-worker's/wife's home on Christmas Eve to tell the wife that, "her marriage did not glorify God and to please give her husband a divorce because god placed it upon the husband's heart and hers to be together."  She then broke off the affair six months later because she was already having another affair simultaneously with the co-worker's co-worker, who was my husband who now is married to her. 

STEP 3.  hire a private investigator and you will then be fortunate to even find out more.

"I've been sitting here trying to think of just what to say. I want justice for Roger. You have helped a very destructive and sick woman to destroy our friends life long work and earnings. That's just wrong. "I" (NOT ROGER?) need you to fix the damage you have caused Roger by writing him an apology and a letter to the court saying that Jean is manipulating the courts with half truths turned into lies.

If you can do this I will consider possibly spending some time talking (?) with you(definitely "My ego and pride" thing again!) 

Enjoy your music,

"You aren't the one on trial in front of a judge in 29 days and having your children and your home at stake now are you? (and apparently neither was Roger in his own divorce...She truly has The ME, MYSELF, AND I syndrome along with "MY ego and pride" thing goin on!) You are good at forgetting your wrong doings and expecting others just to forget too. Don't ignore my request, it's on the table until the end of today, after that you will have to read old email to stay connected to me because I will be done communicating with you in every and any way.     (definitely "My ego and pride" thing again!)

A friendship (?) with you would be so much better than what we now have.



Judge who had affair with man's ex-wife while overseeing his child support case cannot be sued, rules court

  • Judge Wade McCree cannot be sued by the defendant of a child support case he presided over
  • McCree had an affair with the ex-wife of the defendant while the case was before his court
  • He sexted Geniene La'Shay Mott from the bench, had trysts with her in his chambers and gave her thousands of dollars
  • He ordered Robert King be tethered and forced to pay child support
  • There is a longstanding doctrine that judges cannot be sued for their decisions in court
  • A judge upheld a lower court's ruling to this effect, but also said McCree's actions were 'often reprehensible'
A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s ruling that a disgraced Detroit judge cannot be sued by a defendant in a child support case he presided over.
The decision dated Monday by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati cites existing U.S. Supreme Court law that Wade McCree is immune from lawsuits stemming from judicial actions.
Robert King had claimed that the former Wayne County Circuit Court judge violated his civil rights.
Shielded: A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court's ruling that disgraced judge Wade McCree cannot be sued by a defendant in a child support case he presided over

Illicit affair: Geniene La'Shay Mott had a child-support case pending in McCree's court and disclosed their affair in December 2013
Illicit affair: Geniene La'Shay Mott had a child-support case pending in McCree's court and disclosed their affair in December 2013

The married McCree had a sexual relationship with Geniene La’Shay Mott while presiding over a 2012 child support case between her and King.
Some of the trysts took place in McCree’s chambers.
According to the Detroit Free Press, McCree sexted Mott from the bench and gave her thousands of dollars.
Courts have long prevented judges being sued by litigants for their decisions, but King's attorney Joel Sklar says McCree used his judicial immunity 'as a shield for self interest.'
'There should be no immunity for what happened here,' said Sklar.
He is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court for help in challenging the doctrine that judges can't be sued for their court decisions.
Sexting scandal: McCree allegedly sexted Mott from the bench during the proceedingsSexting scandal: McCree allegedly sexted Mott from the bench during the proceedings
 Brian Einhorn, McCree's attorney, says his client's decision to tether King and order him to pay child support was the appropriate one.

'In our system, people are going to be unhappy when a judge renders a decision. And if a judge can be sued because the decision they made — in someone’s opinion — was right, wrong or unfair, then our system of justice doesn’t work,' Einhorn said, reports the Detroit Free Press.

King says McCree found favorably for his ex-wife because of his 'desires for sexual gratifications.'

THe court, while ruling that McCree cannot be sued by King, called McCree's actions 'often reprehensible.'

Michigan’s Supreme Court in March ordered McCree removed from office and suspended him for six more years if he’s re-elected in November.

The Detroit Free Press reports that McCree's father, Wade Hampton McCree, Jr was the first black person appointed to the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appleals and the second black solicitor general in the U.S.
Read more:

Two Judges Draw Censures for Courthouse Sexual Affairs  

, The Recorder                 
But a majority on the commission stopped short of seeking the judges' ouster, noting that both men were contrite and had cooperated with the CJP's investigations.
"An appreciation for the impropriety of one's actions indicates a capacity to reform," the Steiner order said. "As such, the commission believes this censure adequately protects the public."
The censures appear to mark new territory for the commission, which has dealt publicly with judges accused of sexual harassment and one who had sex with a criminal defendant but never with jurists having sex in their chambers, said commission director Victoria Henley.
Costa Mesa attorney Paul Meyer represented both judges. In dual statements he reiterated his clients' apologies.
Steiner was elected to the bench in June 2010 and took his seat in 2011. Woodward was appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006.
In a stipulated agreement, Steiner admitted to engaging in courthouse sexual activity, once with a former intern and twice with an attorney who practiced in Orange County Superior Court. Both women were former students in classes Steiner taught at Chapman University School of Law. (Steiner is no longer listed in the school's faculty directory.)
Steiner wrote a letter of recommendation for the former intern when she applied for a position with the Orange County district attorney's office, where he had worked as a prosecutor before becoming a judge. After she failed to land the job, the judge called two attorneys in the office to ask why his letter hadn't secured her hiring.
The commission also criticized Steiner for transferring his other lover's cases to specific judges, a task he should have left to the presiding judge. Commissioners concluded, too, that he committed prejudicial misconduct by not disqualifying himself from cases involving a long-standing friend, attorney Steven Baric. But they found insufficient evidence to prove a quid-pro-quo relationship, suggested by some Southern California media, that involved the trade of sex for help finding a job for the former intern. Local authorities and the attorney general's office had reviewed the case but did not press charges.
Woodward carried on a nearly 11-month affair with his courtroom clerk, having sex with her in chambers and "in public places," exchanging personal emails on the court's computer system and passing sexually charged notes to her, according to his stipulated agreement with the commission. Despite complaints from fellow clerks and the clerk's husband about the couple's actions, Woodward repeatedly blocked efforts to have the woman reassigned. It wasn't until May 2013, after expressing "security concerns" about the clerk's husband, that Woodward confessed to his superiors.
The commission split in deciding the proper punishment for the judges, with the judges on the commission supporting censure. Three nonjudge members—Anthony Capozzi, Maya Dillard Smith and Sandra Talcott—dissented and said they would have pursued the judges' removal from office. Commissioner Mary Lou Aranguren supported the Steiner censure but would have sought tougher sanctions against Woodward.
Contact the reporter at cmiller@alm.com.


My affairs with two married judges: Glamorous legal clerk's confession in £33m race case 

A glamorous legal clerk at the centre of a £33million race discrimination case yesterday admitted she had affairs with two married judges

Mother-of-four Lizzie Wiseman first had a fling with Deputy High Court Judge Justin Fenwick QC, then with Recorder Roger Stewart QC, she told an employment tribunal.

She was accused of 'manipulating' both men when they were head of her chambers as part of an alleged racist conspiracy against Indian-born junior barrister Aisha Bijlani.

Dr Bijlani claims that the legal clerks at the Four New Square chambers in London's Lincoln's Inn regarded her as 'an educated wog' and never passed her any work.

But her complaints to bosses got her nowhere because they were having affairs with one of the people she was complaining about, she says.

Aisha Bijlani
Lizzie Wiseman

Lizzie Wiseman (left) told the tribunal she had affairs with two married judges  junior barrister. She added that Aisha Bijlani (right) was 'not popular' with clients.

She is claiming £33million for racial discrimination and victimisation.

Mrs Wiseman, 44, herself married twice to the same man, made the explosive claims about the behind-the-scenes behaviour at the firm as she gave evidence to the Central London Employment Tribunal.

She admitted first having an affair with Judge Fenwick, when he was head of the firm. The 60-year-old has been married since 1975.

Then, when Judge Stewart took over as head of the chambers, she began an extramarital affair with him.

Judge Stewart, 46, married in 1988 and has three children.

Giving evidence about her relationship with Judge Fenwick, Mrs Wiseman said: 'It started some time in 1999 and it petered out, it ended, after August 2000.'

But Althea Brown, cross-examining, suggested that the affair had continued.

She said: 'There may have been occasions when, how should I put it, the relationship flared up again?'

Mrs Wiseman admitted: 'It petered out in August 2000, but there may have been one or two occasions after that.'

She added: 'I started a personal relationship with Roger Stewart in July 2008. I have since separated from my husband and have been cohabiting with Roger Stewart since March 2009.'

Roger Stewart QC
Judge Justin Fenwick QC

The lovers: Justice Fenwick QC (left) and Roger Stewart QC
Mrs Wiseman, wearing a short dress and thigh-length black boots, defended herself in the witness box from accusations that the affairs with her bosses made life difficult for Dr Bijlani.

But Miss Brown, representing Dr Bijlani, suggested Mrs Wiseman used her affairs to abuse her position.
She said: 'When you began your relationship with the second head of chambers, there was an absence of accountability as to how you were doing your job.

'The truth is, you have manipulated your position as senior clerk by your relationships with successive heads of chambers so you have not been held accountable to the way you do your job since 2000.'

Mrs Wiseman replied: 'I do not accept that.'

Dr Bijlani, who worked as a doctor at Guy's Hospital in London before switching to a law career, has been off work with clinical depression since last year.

She says her career has been choked by racism and accuses senior clerk Mrs Wiseman and three previous heads of chambers - Judge Fenwick, Judge Stewart and John Powell QC - of conspiring against her. Her claims are rejected by the law firm, which says she was simply not good enough to be earning the sort of money other barristers brought in.

Mrs Wiseman told the panel: 'The claimant was demanding and found it hard to accept criticism. 
'She would flit between being demanding and imperious and attempting to be charming and persuasive.'

She added that Dr Bijlani had an 'unrealistic' impression of her own abilities and there were complaints from clients about the quality of her work.

The tribunal, which is expected to last another two weeks, previously heard that Dr Bijlani has a history of making race complaints.

Mrs Wiseman's affair with Mr Fenwick began just a year after she married stockbroker Luke Wiseman for the second time.

She first wed Mr Wiseman in 1989, but they divorced in1996.

They remarried in 1998, and Mr Wiseman is still joint owner of the London house his wife now shares with Mr Stewart.

Mr Stewart and Mrs Wiseman have both declined to comment outside the hearing.

Meanwhile at Mr Fenwick's country house his grown-up daughter said: 'My parents are not here.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1223869/Blonde-legal-clerk-centre-33m-race-case-tells-court-affairs-married-judges.html#ixzz3Il8SNrMH
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Former Akron judge facing scrutiny over sexual affair, car loan, spent cash

By Phil Trexler
Beacon Journal staff writer   

A former Akron Municipal Court judge faces state disciplinary action based on claims he had an affair with the defendant in an eviction case, an allegation he once denied.

Orlando J. Williams is also accused of forging loan documents to purchase a used car and of improperly spending settlement money earmarked for three children whose father died in a crash, according to disciplinary records released Wednesday through the Ohio Supreme Court.

Williams, who was appointed judge in 2009 and later served three years as a chief civil magistrate after losing his election bid, is named in the 10-page complaint filed by Scott Drexel, disciplinary counsel for the Supreme Court’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The board has the power to suspend or revoke the law licenses of attorneys.

A message seeking comment from Williams was not immediately returned. He now lives in Fairfield, in southwestern Ohio.

According to Supreme Court rules, Williams has an opportunity to respond to the allegations, or have a public hearing before a disciplinary panel in four to six months.

Williams, 57, abruptly resigned as a magistrate in July 2012 amid allegations that he had a sexual relationship with a woman whose eviction case had been pending in his court.

At the time, Williams denied to reporters that he was having a sexual relationship with the woman. He called her an acquaintance.

According to the disciplinary records, however, Williams did begin a sexual relationship with the woman soon after first meeting her when she appeared in court in March 2012 to answer the eviction notice.

Shortly after the hearing, Williams drove to the 25-year-old woman’s rental property and invited her for coffee, Drexel’s investigation shows.

“During the conversation, [Williams] flirted with [the woman] and referred to the [landlord] as a slum lord,” Drexel wrote.

Within days of the coffee meeting, Drexel contends, the two engaged in consensual sex. Williams failed to immediately recuse himself from the woman’s eviction case. She later left the rental property in April, but Williams held on to the case to determine damages due the landlord until late June.

As the Beacon Journal and other media were reviewing court records on the eviction and Williams’ potential conflict, he suddenly resigned as magistrate. He said his desire to return to private practice — and not his relationship with the woman — was the reason for resigning.

Four weeks before recusing himself, however, the woman was heard on a dash-camera video — taken May 20, 2012, while she was being arrested on a charge of drunken driving — urging a State Highway Patrol trooper to contact Williams, whom she twice refers to as her boyfriend.

Williams also is accused of forging loan records to inflate his salary in March 2013 to purchase a used sedan from Summit Toyota for $21,900. He did not reveal to the loan company that he had been fired from Byron Potts Co. days earlier, according to court records. The sedan was later repossessed.

He also is accused of withdrawing for his personal use about $11,000 from an account designated to be given to three minor children of a 26-year-old Akron man who died in a traffic crash in 2006. The account, which contained $11,496 in November 2012, now has about $321, records show.

Phil Trexler can be reached at 330-996-3717 or ptrexler@thebeaconjournal.com. He can be followed on Twitter at www.twitter.com/PhilTrexler

Click here to read or leave a comment(s) on this story.

Above the Law
A Legal Tabloid - News, Insights, and Colorful Commentary on Law Firms and the Legal Profession

Judge Mark Fuller
It’s mid-August, and from what we’ve heard thus far, at least one federal judge with a lifetime appointment had an action-packed weekend.

As we mentioned in Morning Docket, Judge Mark Fuller of the Middle District of Alabama spent a night in jail after he allegedly had a violent altercation with his wife, Kelli Fuller. The Fullers were staying at the Ritz-Carlton in Atlanta, Georgia, when all hell broke loose — as tends to happen when accusations of marital infidelities are mixed with alcohol.

Judge Fuller was released from jail Monday morning after paying $5,000 bond, but what caused these events to occur, and with whom did his wife accuse him of having an affair?

According to Decaturish, a locally sourced news site, the incident unfolded after Kelli Fuller accused her husband of marital transgressions. Per the site’s report, Judge Fuller’s “other woman” was allegedly one of his law clerks. Here’s some additional info on what allegedly went down, from the Associated Press:Police say the judge was on the bed when they entered the room, which smelled of alcohol. There was broken glass and hair on the floor. Blood was discovered in the bathroom.

Kelli Fuller told police that her husband became violent after she accused him of having an affair with a law clerk in his Montgomery office. She said he pulled her hair, threw her to the ground and dragged her, kicked her and struck her several times in the face.

Mark Fuller told police that his wife became violent as she confronted him with allegations of cheating. The judge told police he was watching television when his wife threw a drink glass at him. He told officers that he grabbed her hair and threw her to the ground to defend himself.

Judge Fuller’s stepson, Hunter Gregg, was also on scene this weekend, and told police that “this was not the first time an incident like this had occurred.” Yikes. This keeps getting worse and worse. We’ve reached out to the Atlanta Police Department to obtain a copy of Judge Fuller’s arrest report. If and when we do hear back from the APD, we will be sure to update this post so you can take a look at it.

Judge Fuller was carted off to jail shortly after the police arrived. He was charged with misdemeanor battery, a charge that typically carries a fine of up to $1,000 and is punishable by up to a year of jail time. Here’s Judge Fuller’s booking report from the Atlanta Police Department:

The Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press claims that this is not the first time Judge Fuller has been accused of domestic violence. When the jurist divorced his first wife, Lisa Boyd Fuller, in 2012, he requested that the court file be sealed for security reasons, as it allegedly contained “accusations of domestic violence, drug abuse and the judge’s alleged affair with his court bailiff.”

Judge Fuller is next due in court on August 22, 2014, for a probable cause hearing, even though his own docket in the Middle District of Alabama is quite full on that day. In the future, we’d suggest that His Honor stick to banging his gavel instead of allegedly banging his law clerks.

On a more serious note, if you’re involved in a verbally or physically abusive relationship, there are friends, family, and colleagues you can call. If you’re a victim of domestic violence, reach out if you need help. If you feel that you are in immediate danger, please call the  

National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233). Assistance is available in English and Spanish.

Federal Judge Accused of Hitting Wife in Argument [Associated Press]
Federal judge jailed after alleged domestic dispute [CNN]
Wife confronted U.S. judge about affair [Decaturish]
Montgomery circuit court seals file in U.S. district judge’s divorce proceedings [Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press]

Judge Ron Mamiya is censured for having affair, but gets to keep job

In Novemer 2008, a settlement was reached between Seattle Municipal Court Judge Ron Mamiya and an employee who later sued for sexual harassment.  It has been documented that after she broke off the affair with Mamiya, she had to quit her job, because he would call her into his chambers, where he would then kiss and fondle her without her permission .  The city paid the woman $67,500 and Mamiya paid her 67,500 for a total of $135,000.  One of the conditions to his settlement was agreeing to "familiarize himself again with the Code of Judicial Conduct in its entirety," especially the one stating, "require judges to uphold the integrity of the judiciary by avoiding impropriety and the appearance of impropriety and by acting at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."