Adultery in New England
Love free or die
Time to check into the Motel New Hampshire
My apology to the person who is deleting my blogs. Apparently the truth has hit a little to close to home for some. Education on any subject is a powerful thing and is something that should be shared with others.
Only NH is truly the keep it simple stupid state. NH divorce laws state that NH is a 50/50 division state. Yet, NH has revisited multiple times voting on the NH adultery law, to make adultery as legal as the courts have made it for over the past 50 years. According to NH records, NH has never been a 50/50 division state. That is because NH never had the capability by law, to fairly divide property and assets in a divorce.
NH alimony simply is not awarded more than 5 years maximum according to NH divorce records. NH is labeled throughout the country as a non alimony state. Therefore, tells us how often NH court records actually show a court order for alimony. It is simply very easy for one spouse to simply commit grand theft and drain all funds from the other in a NH divorce. All while the majority still rules it simply impossible for one spouse to support themselves, and pay 50 percent back, in just 5 years, pursuant to NH divorce records.
When searching for a NH attorney, more than one shockingly told me that the spouse who takes what they can first, makes out the best by NH family court standards. Even though NH still claims by law to be a 50/50 division state. In other words, 1+1=3 when NH's voodoo adultery has been committed by NH courts. Apparently keeping things simple stupid is the number one financial rule in NH. This is one of many reasons the state of NH's integrity very simply continues to support the grade of an (F).
Because of hundreds of daily NH divorce cases ending the same as Brosor v Brosor, NH's Supreme Court immediately put into affect 12 months later, a much needed new rule article 1.25a on January 1, 2011. Brosor v Brosor went public January 1, 2010. Article 1.25a states that all financial information must now be exchanged within 45 days or 10 days before the first hearing, whichever comes first. However, the majority very simply still proves that a single spouse is incapable of supporting themselves, and paying back in just 5 years, what they stole from marital funds and assets, that accumulated from a 10, 15, 20+ years of marriage. Do the math.
All what the NH Supreme Court rule article 1.25a is now doing, is substantiating on record what one spouse committing grand theft wrongly receives, that was stolen, which is the other spouse's 50 percent due, pursuant to NH divorce laws. Thus, clearly ascertaining one of the major problems here in NH is the lack of math skills and budgeting the state's funds in a clear and fair manner.
Sadly but thankfully, NH 's Supreme Court is the only supreme court so far that took until 2003, to finally dust off and open a 1960's Webster Dictionary, to actually learn the definition for sexual intercourse. Obviously they clearly have way to much time on their hands for a simple thought. They proudly documented this big event in the divorce decree for Blanchflower v Blanchflower. Evidently they bypassed the A's for "Another", the E's for "Equitable State", and the F's for "Fault Divorce" but apparently were capable of only finding the S's for Sexual Intercourse. The wife simply had an affair with a woman.
NH Adultery Law:TITLE LXII, CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 645, NH RSA 645:3 Adultery - A person is guilty of a class B misdemeanor if, being a married person, engages in sexual intercourse with another not his/her spouse or, being unmarried, engages in sexual intercourse with another known by him/her to be married. Source. 1971, 518:1, 1971, 269:19, eff. July 1, 1992.
However, for the record once and for all, NH's adultery law clearly states, "sexual intercourse with another", therefore very clearly does not just specify "that sexual intercourse is limited to sexual acts that could lead to the conception of a baby." In fact the real definition for NH's adultery law, does "rise to the level of adultery under NH law." NH's judicial system with some politicians alike insist on simply telling the media that "some people are confused" , when it comes to NH's adultery law. The definition for "another" is simply "one that is different and/or in addition to." In addition to, simply covers all other forms of sex that is different from sexual intercourse. So exactly what is there to confuse? Those who don't know that the dictionary covers from A to Z?
N.H. reacts to Supreme Court gay marriage decision “Today, the Supreme Court has affirmed the founding principle of the United States of America that all are created equal,” Gov. Maggie Hassan said in a statement. “All married couples, no matter their gender, will receive the fair and equal treatment under the law that they so rightly deserve.” Clearly History taught us that for over 200 years, people of status, wealth, government, royalty, and yes even some of those of the church simply had same gender sexual affairs even back then. To this day humanity has continued to live life with that one fact in place.
NH's past politicians only spoke the truth. It only took NH's Supreme Court 200 years to eventually but only partially catch up with NH legislative laws that have been already in place on the books. This countries judicial system constantly continues to minimize all forms of adultery throughout the years, to the point where the status of NH divorce courts now are exploding with adultery statistics in society's 21st century. To the point where it's so acceptable in society that it's just simply a little "irreconcilable differences" in a divorce now! So clearly our government's history had partially perceived the right idea of at least punishing those who committed adultery. Only Because it simply worked!
Clearly NH's adultery law has always very honestly acknowledged all forms of sex because history spoke the truth! The NH's Supreme Court still illegally refuses to simply abide by the real definition of NH's legislative laws. God forbid one judge could ever now be capable of being charged with adultery. The state of NH has 400+ legislators who voted multiple times throughout the past 200 years, not to change NH's adultery law. But NH's family judicial branch, who are their own little mafia overpowering entity, will clearly never abide by NH state legislative laws, and will continue to illegally redesign and rewrite the history of NH state and federal legislative laws along with the constitution of the United States of America.
Had NH's Supreme Court wisely educated themselves further in the 1960's Webster dictionary, from A-Z, at their disposal in the 21st century, it would have avoided their continuous present day shameful attempt, of illegally twisting, the true definition of the actual NH state legislative adultery law in place, that has been strongly supported for over 200 years by NH's legislators.
NH family court records clearly have been supporting prostitution and polygamy without a license, while also supporting grand theft and Welfare Fraud in the process, for well over the past 50 years. This is the excused see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil law/rule that's been in practice by NH's very own superior criminal court Judge William J. Groff for over 18 years, along with NH's very own Supreme Court for over the past 50 years. NH's judicial branch's favorite game has always been domino's in NH divorce courts. They continue to add more and more people to see how far and how many will fall no matter what the cost is to it's government.
NH's Superior Criminal Court Judge William J. Groff was the presiding judge over a divorcing couple's relief hearing in Nashua, NH, that was originally requested by a wife seeking temporary alimony. When the wife's attorney told Judge Groff that the husband and his attorney were lying, only then did he ask, "Do you have proof?" The wife's attorney said, "yes! A private investigators report."
NH RSA 458:16 TEMPORARY RELIEF AND PERMANENT RESTRAINING ORDER SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (F) "Order Temporary allowance to be paid for the support of the other."
SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (H): "Ordering the sale of the house of the marital residence provided that both parties have filed a written stipulation with the clerk, explicitly agreeing on the sale of the property prior to the final hearing on merits. (OOPS! Another hypocritical back door law especially if the courts final ruling is on fault grounds which is not decided until the final decree!) If the parties have not so stipulated, the sale of the marital residence shall not be ordered prior to the final hearing as long as the court deems the party residing within the marital residence to have sufficient financial resources to pay the debts or obligations generated by the property, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and ordinary maintenance, as those debts and obligations come due." The second half of this law completely deletes the first half, because the courts would clearly not know all the facts until the final divorce decree. Again, stating then whether or not it is ruled on fault grounds.
Without so much as looking at even one piece of evidence, a bank account or payroll stub, Judge Groff then says, "Well, neither one of them can afford the house!" Apparently his mirror, mirror on the wall, who told him he was the fairest one of all, was not receiving any internet or Wi-Fi that day. His final ruling was to simply not only deny the wife alimony, but to now grant the husbands request, to court order property fraud along with grand theft, the sale of her family inheritance mortgage free home (her half anyway because the mortgage was his half purchased from his sister-in-law) for over 40 years, the only roof she had left over her head.
The proceeds from the sale of the house, which the husband received 50% of in the final divorce decree, were then held in escrow until the divorce finalized. Apparently the husband still required means to support his prostitute's fees during and even after the divorce. Judge Groff now was not only leaving the wife broke from a 21 year marriage, but homeless now too, to now live out of her car for the 2 years that it took NH to finalize the divorce, unless her family now rescued her. The only thing missing that day in court from Judge Groff's performance, was a white painted face with a red rubber nose and big blue hair, along with a 6'6" tall bald bailiff called "Bull", who is now not alone passing out hot air balloon rides throughout the courthouse. Welcome to NH's very own version of the twilight zone. Apparently these vampires will suck you dry!
Also in Brosor V Brosor, Mr. Brosor's lawyer, Criminal Defense Attorney, Richard C. Follender, committed fraud when he force the wife to sign the transfer deed to their Timeshare, with it only stating she was "signing of her own free will", because he said, "it would not be legally acceptable with her crossing that part out and notating that it was, "court ordered" in the divorce decree", such as she did. If a court order is not even legally acceptable on a transfer deed to a city or town, then what does it say for the court order to begin with? Their committing fraud! He then also charges her $450.00 to commit this fraud, and resend another transfer deed to be signed as is or, he will charge her with Contempt of Court!
Meanwhile during just a 3 month span, the husband had already closed all joint accounts. He then drained an additional $23,000 from his 401K to cover $23,000 of his shared prostitute of a mistress expenses, that he whitened out all the descriptions/pay to on his checking account statement, just for a 9 month period alone. His payroll stubs showed without the wife's knowledge, that he also was premeditatedly draining and banking his 401K for the past several years, possibly to support other mistresses. This same 9 month period showed a cash flow of $7,000 already above and beyond his yearly gross salary that he stated on his financial affidavit, which was also $10,000 to $15,000 below what his pay stubs had yearly grossed the past seven years. He also immediately transferred ownership of the newest vehicle.
These same bank statements also showed woman's retail stores and catalog orders, restaurants and movie theatres, ski lodge reservations at Loon Mtn, Ragged Mtn, and Sunappee Mtn, along with reservation reward charges of $12.00 per month on his credit card. He purchased new clothing for himself and his mistress spending $500 at a single location. He also spent an additional $3,000 in automotive repairs for the prostitute he shared with his coworker.
He also was the big spender, again with his credit card, at a Chinese restaurant, making his own 19 year old daughter with her boyfriend come out to eat with him, his coworker, and their shared prostitute of a mistress. This occurred before he caught the wife's private investigator and filed for divorce. Another prior incident, was when his then 14 year daughter came home disgusted from shopping with him at Costco. She immediately ran in the house and told her mother when they returned home that. "Dad stood and flirted with a Costco employee with me standing right there!", making her uncomfortable. She didn't care that her father angrily repeatedly said, "Stop It, No I Didn't!" His daughter would not back down and repeated herself, raising her voice too! The mother just looked him straight in the eye and ended it by telling their daughter that, "Your father would never cheat on me, that's something he'd never do." That's when she knew she had to save money for a private investigator.
Without the wife's knowledge, he immediately removed her as beneficiary off his $460,000 life insurance policy while increasing his wife's policy to 3 times her amount with himself still as the beneficiary, all before filing for a divorce. The prostitute of a mistress with 4 children by 3 separate fathers that he married, became his beneficiary instead of his only adult child (That we're aware of). Apparently NH family courts are not aware that Cinderella is only suppose to be a fairytale.
He also had $45,000 in his bank accounts at the time of the relief hearing. He filed for divorce 4 days after catching the wife's private investigator, then took a weekend getaway for 2 with his and his co-workers shared prostitute of a mistress. He then cancelled the wife's cell phone to pay $274.00 to buy 5 new cell phones for his and his co-worker's shared prostitute of a mistress with 4 children by 3 separate fathers, all while this shared prostitute of a mistress was unemployed, on food stamps and other government aide. Who already divorced twice, while having these 2 marital affairs during the process period of her second divorce.
He paid all of this above his additional expense of the divorce itself. This is how NH budgets a 50/50 division in a fault divorce while declaring it as just a little "Irreconcilable Differences." NH family courts have been clearly supporting all the illegal Roger and Laurie Brosors committing grand theft, prostitution and now Welfare Fraud all right here in NH. Given that 71 percent of divorce cases today involve adultery, do you still need to wonder why NH taxes are constantly increasing?
Within this same 3 month period, he was also paying his prostitute of a mistress's mortgage which was in foreclosure and utilities simultaneously above the ones he had with his own wife. All while this shared prostitute of a mistress simply continued to commit NH Welfare Fraud. Simply by oops, not telling the government she was now receiving not 1 but 2 married additional incomes of $80,000 per year living under her roof for months. One right after the other, who now also was being supported by her government aide and food stamps. All while they filed for divorce, now in hopes that one would marry her, once their divorces were finalized. Well folks, one idiot actually did. This being her 3rd marriage. Do you seriously still have to question who the trouble making crook was in this marriage?!? But in his defense, he already knew this is NH's way.
NH RSA 458:16 TEMPORARY RELIEF AND PERMANENT RESTRAINING ORDER LAW SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (G) "Enjoining party from transferring, encumbering, hypothecating, concealing, or in any way disposing of any property, real or personal, except in the usual course of business, or for the necessities of life and if such order is directed against a party, it may require such party to notify the other party of any proposed extraordinary expenditures and to account to the court for all such extraordinary expenditures." This law which is completely ignored by NH's family court should be automatic and should clearly not have to go before a judge before the order is in place. Brosor v Brosor is substantial evidence of that.
She chose someone else's husband of 21 years who had a daughter in college, who simply paid all her expenses over someone else's husband of 25 years, who had 1 in high school and 1 in college, who started to give her I.O.U's instead, all simultaneously while she lived off the government, and all only just for her sexual favors. This is simply called now adultery, grand theft, prostitution, and now includes welfare fraud. This is NH's version of a swinging sanctimony design for marriage that's been in practice for over 50 years that is only just a little "Irreconcilable Differences" in NH's divorce records.
This kind of accepting fiasco behaviors, committing adultery, prostitution, grand theft, and welfare fraud, all within a marriage, aided by NH's Family Judicial Branch, has been costing your ever so increasing hard earn paid tax dollars in both, NH Welfare and Medicaid, in more ways than one, unnecessarily. This by far is not 50/50 pursuant to NH Divorce Laws. But this clearly explains the problem's with NH's government lacking an I.Q. in bookkeeping and budgeting skills. And above all, NH's lack of respect for the law.
NH Court Clerk Records shamefully support that nothing has changed since the NH's Supreme Court finally received an incomplete in sex education on sexual intercourse, from a 1960's dictionary in the 21st century. That is other than maybe now knowing what to use those black robes for. So sorry to burst the NH Supreme Court's false perfect bubble they made, but no, babies are not, nor have they ever been delivered to your front door step, like a jar of classic pickles from the stork. At least they finally learned that it takes a man and a woman to even conceive a baby.
Because of all NH's Judges and Marital Masters history and continuous practice of, "See No Evil, Hear No Evil, And above all Speak No Evil" Fiascoes and court rulings, has now caused enough greater reason and concern throughout the years, to force NH State House Representatives to step up, to vote to form a Redress Grievance Committee in 2010. Shocked by the numerous court files, proving NH's Judicial System is ignoring federal and state laws, with no legal accountability to enforce against these actions, forced NH legislators to vote to dismantle this committee a year later.
This happened due to the failure of CACR 26 in 2012. It was clearly sabotaged by NH television and newspaper media , politicians old and new, and justices alike. However it did not stop a small group to continue NH's Redress of Grievances committee outside the state house. They are still presently continuing to collect NH court records, that are clearly supporting NH's Judicial Branch's illegal, and unethical ways of ruling. Still to this day, NH's family courts are literally taking lives unnecessarily. NH still claims to be an "Equitable State." Family court clerk records that go as far back as more than 50 years, supports the fact that they lied!
Since our present Justices all support the CACR 26 language that will be on November's ballot, I encourage members of the NH Bar to also embrace the amended language as well.
Rep. Paul Mirski
Enfield Center, NH".
NH's judicial branch ignores legislative laws while the Entire NH Bar Association completely ignores NH justices only right here in NH. Thus, once again, NH playing their favorite game of dominos. In 2010, was also the year that State House Representative Horrigan presented a bill to no longer have Adultery as a crime. He stated that the state's government has no business regulating what 2 "consenting" adults do with one another. Well just because 2 adults "consent" to do something with one another, still does not make it right or legal.
However, it is also State House Rep. Horrigan who believes that people on government aide, should be allowed the right to purchase fire arms with their EBT Food Stamp Cards, if they "consent" to need one for safety. Well I for one, along with the coworker's wife, are very grateful that fire arms cannot simply be purchase and financed with a government EBT Food Stamp Card, given to what my ex husband's prostitute of a mistress was very capable of doing to others, all while already being supported by the state of NH. The adultery bill failed in 2010. We also now have others who have been arguing that adultery is a moral issue and not a legal issue.
Many people have truly forgotten the real purpose for having laws in the first place. All laws in this country have always been, and will always be, on what was perceived to be morally based first, on a right from wrong to any living being and humanity. Secondly, people have also clearly forgotten that as long as our government has any say in regulating any laws and rules pertaining to our marriage licenses and divorce decrees, proves our government has already been, and will always be in the business of regulating, our bedrooms, sex lives, and love lives, whether 2 adults are "consenting" or not. Thirdly, NH's judicial branch of government needs to stop not "consenting" to doing the jobs they were entrusted to do, and actually "consent" to do the jobs they were actually delegated to do. To simply follow the legislative laws of this country and NH state.
The NH Grievance Committee was clearly very much needed because their findings now not only supported clear cut evidence that not only did NH's Judicial Branch break NH's legislative laws, but also supported evidence, that the NH Judiciary Conduct Committee, the NH Bar Association Dispute Resolution Committee, and last but never shall be the least, the NH Supreme Courts Attorney Discipline Office, have all been only protecting their own kind! So why stop the domino's there NH? NH might as well just go to NH State Prisons, choose a few convicts, such as Pamela Smart for one, just throw black robes on them, then place them behind a courtroom bench!
"[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts. The rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law."
"2. The parties may redact (edit) all but the last four digits of any account numbers and social security numbers that appear on any statements or documents."
However, it simply is (OOPS!) against NH's law Title LXII Criminal Code Chapter 638 Fraud, Section 638:3 Tampering With Public or Private Record, and it even simply illegally goes (OOPS!) against the United State's Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1505 : US Code - Section 1505: Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.
Forgery and Fraudulent Practices Generally
"Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits; or Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress -Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both."
My ex began going to weekly AA meetings after he was introduced to his shared prostitute of a mistress by his co-worker, who was also going to these same AA meetings during his own affair with his and my ex's same shared prostitute of a mistress. This same shared prostitute of a mistress also had these husbands HIV tested, that is after they already had sex with her, then she sent the results to the wife with a note saying, "I have the originals for safe keeping you know how to reach me"(How thoughtful). And yes, there are records on all of this.
To all NH wives, Roger and Laurie Brosor, with above all the NH Supreme Court have clearly taught us a strong lesson, for the need to still use protection within your own marriages, now in the 21st century. My deepest sympathy's to Richard Follender's wife, if he should still have one. One thing for sure is that, NH's family courts accepting defense on NH sex addicts committing adultery proves that both sex addiction and the sanctimony in marriage in NH society has seriously gone straight to hell in a hand basket. This is all just simply a little "Irreconcilable Differences" and that's all it will ever be in NH family courts.
However, this did not mean a married spouse with their shared prostitute of a paramour. This is how its simply done in NH. For the little whore house is truly no longer just in Texas anymore. NH family court records very simply has supported adultery, prostitution, grand theft, and welfare fraud for over 50 years! Seriously, how much more can 1 judicial branch cost the state of NH? seriously, you don't want to find out!
May 11, 2007
You don’t know me, my name is Laurie Nurnberg (NOW BROSOR). My children and I are friends with Roger. I met Roger through one of his co-workers. I’m writing in hopes of easing your mind in regards to my friendship with Roger. I tell you the honest truth when I say that Roger and I are good friends.(SHE STATES, "GOOD FRIENDS" INSTEAD OF "JUST FRIENDS!") Sometimes when I here Roger share his concerns, it seems to me that you’re wondering if our friendship is more than it is? I promise you that it is strictly and mutually platonic.
Jean, I know that you’re concerned about Roger sharing with me about his concerns at home in general. I can appreciate how you must feel. I think we all wonder if people dislike us based on what they have heard about us and what they believe is true. I can honestly say that I am a loyal friend to "ROGER" and I have genuine concern for you as a family. I want you to know that I’m not judging you. I don’t create opinions based on what I’m told; I like to meet people and get to know them. Men just don’t seem to have the gift of words like most of us woman do. When I was going through my divorce I was very scared that my husband didn’t love me anymore, therefore I was unlovable. Not true, he and I did love one another, we just spent our time hurting each with words and actions trying to prove the other wrong and ourselves right. In the end the only right answer would have been to have open and honest communication together with a qualified or pastor. But my husband didn’t have the courage to share his true thoughts and feeling out of fear and rejection.
In retrospect I wish I would have put ¼ of my energy into treating my husband the way that I wished he would have treated me, with respect an dignity instead of hiding behind fear and anger. I built up a wall so high around my heart made up of past hurts not forgiven, that my husband chose to give up and walk away rather than to “Talk it out.” My stored up pain and anger scared him away from our marriage because it was all that I ever showed him.
Talk about an average everyday compulsive liar. Written on The CD that she refers to as "on the family" was titled in Bold Green Marker, "WIFE SWAP" IN ALL 4 CORNERS OF THE CD JACKET! The CD itself had, "WIFE SWAP BUILD" WRITTEN ON IT! The following statements were made about me in emails written by Laurie to her married ex lover, who was my husband's co-worker and friend! Remember, I never met or spoke with this women once during these emails.
STEP 2. You will then find emails and voicemails telling you how this stranger really feels about you.
EMAIL ON JULY 25, 2007 TO THE CO-WORKER
EMAIL ON OCTOBER 12, 2007 TO THE CO-WORKER
* “I have been vengeful just like you and Jean are being right now towards Roger and I.” (You Think?)
EMAIL ON OCTOBER 30, 2007 TO THE CO-WORKER
* “You have helped a very destructive and sick woman.”
JUNE 14, 2007 EMAIL FROM LAURIE TO HER MARRIED EX LOVER:
"I can tell that you want to be able to have me believe that you love me and that being at work having this conversation isn't doing it.
I know and respect that your hands are tied financially, that's not it. (SURE! She needs medical coverage, and to house, feed, clothe 4 children and herself, while being unemployed, applying for disability, while having sex with multiple married men, and already on government aid and food stamps, while her house is in foreclosure!...00PS! Then she was investigated for Welfare Fraud for not telling them about the additional $80,000 married yearly income living under her roof, that she received and supported with her government aid, while they were divorcing their wives to marry her! Still with me so far? Believe me, boy do I know how difficult to keep up with all of this is! Only in NH folks, only in NH!) We shouldn't even be living together even if we were OK which we are not. What hurts the worst is that you aren't there for me. You always leave, walk away, go unavailable. I'm going through some tough stuff right now and are you the ones supporting me emotionally and thinking things through with me, telling me it's all going to be alright and I'm making the right choices? NO, Roger is!
I don't even feel like I can share with you how I feel about you and I without running away. Hell, Here I am, the stupid dependent enabler begging to be loved. How pathetic am I? I always choose Mr. Unavailable, that's you, you are so unavailable it isn't funny yet I cry for and miss you and somewhere deep in my heart I can't give up on you, I won't allow myself to believe that you are never coming to me. That's called denial. When I'm with you I feel great and hurt at the same time. When I'm around Roger things are just simple and I have a friend to talk to, laugh with and get stuff done.
Why can't you be that with me? Why do I have another married man just waiting to use me to end his shitty marriage? Will I let Him? (here's "My ego and Pride" thing again!)
(WELL, I GUESS WE CLEARLY ALL GOT THE ANSWER TO THAT ONE!)
JULY 1, 2007 EMAIL FROM LAURIE TO HER MARRIED EX LOVER:
"You are a hurting person and I forgive and ask for forgiveness from you for the past hurts to one another. I know that you have court tomorrow and I wish you well and I am praying that Gods grace is with you and you make the right choices for you and your family concerning your marriage.
I own my part in damaging your marriage. No one made me do what we did, I chose to go there freely. I would erase it and all the pain that I have caused if I could but I know I can't. I want you to know that I really truly did love you and I wanted to believe in you so bad that it felt impossible to give up. I had no business in your world and I didn't push you away hard enough.
I now get it. My power is in my beauty and by being emotionally available is how I allured you and others and by not shutting you down the moment I saw your interest is where I went wrong and you couldn't control yourself. I now know that I have that effect on men and that it is powerful. (Here's "My ego and pride" Thing again.)
Roger and I had a long talk today after church and we have decided to love one another only as friends. I won't do to him and his family what I did to you and yours. (Seriously now, REALLY?!?) I want to learn from my mistakes so that I can own my power and use it for good.
You were my second experience with attracting an addict who couldn't say no to me and my seductive ways. (Definitely "My ego and pride" thing again.)The more you poured on the charm, the more you baited me, the more I wanted to believe the lies that told yourself and me until I gave myself permission to sleep with you and fall in love with you. You already knew that I was vulnerable and needy and that given the right attention I would crack eventually. That's where God came in. You knew that if I believed that you had changed and you wanted the same things spiritually that I wanted that I would not be able to walk away and stand on my own. I thought that I had finally found what I was always looking for.
Today at RCC was an all kids lead worship. I thought of you and our dreams and how we met and how far this all got out of control and how I loved you and the promises I made to you in my own heart and I instantly knew that I needed to heal from all of this and (her 2nd ex husband). I knew that I couldn't and wouldn't do this to my sweet friend Roger. (Again, seriously now, REALLY?!?)
I learned about my power as a woman through you and Roger and I have I hope become a better person because of the experiences I am looking squarely at myself, my mistakes, my past behaviors and my denial and I am analyzing all of it with full honesty. It is an ugly, disgusting mess. I fail so deeply at being a good person. I know that I am now failing you, hurting you, but I have to let you go. You need to have all the experiences you need to have in order to learn and I know that you are on the road of enlightenment and you will come out of this wiser. God loves you. His grace is sufficient and he is strongest when we are at our weakest. I admit that I am completely leaning on my Savior to get through. I hope you are too.
I sincerely apologize for hurting you. I had no business commenting about you being abusive because I too have been abusive in my behaviors and you have not been more wrong or bad than I. God loves and forgives us both and I praise him in the highest for that fact.
May God bless you tomorrow and always, please forgive me.
All to him,
In April 2010, it was made public knowledge by Rockingham Christian Church that Laurie Ann Brosor participated in a pastoral care training and certification program called "PALM," "Pastoral Authorized Lay Ministry" at the New England Pastoral Institute in Salem, NH, and has now been announced to the church as a knowledgeable Spiritual and Emotional Guide for those in need, within the church and the community. This is what NH society views are on adultery. As Jesus already stated, just lusting after someone who is not the person’s spouse is the same thing as adultery.
This prostitute went to the co-worker's/wife's home on Christmas Eve to tell the wife that, "her marriage did not glorify God and to please give her husband a divorce because god placed it upon the husband's heart and hers to be together." She then broke off the affair six months later because she was already having another affair simultaneously with the co-worker's co-worker, who was my husband who now is married to her.
STEP 3. hire a private investigator and you will then be fortunate to even find out more.
OCTOBER 30, 2007 EMAIL FROM LAURIE TO HER EX MARRIED LOVER!
If you can do this I will consider possibly spending some time talking (?) with you. (definitely "My ego and pride" thing again!)
Enjoy your music,
OCTOBER 31, 2007 EMAIL FROM LAURIE TO HER EX MARRIED LOVER:
A friendship (?) with you would be so much better than what we now have.
Judge who had affair with man's ex-wife while overseeing his child support case cannot be sued, rules court
- Judge Wade McCree cannot be sued by the defendant of a child support case he presided over
- McCree had an affair with the ex-wife of the defendant while the case was before his court
- He sexted Geniene La'Shay Mott from the bench, had trysts with her in his chambers and gave her thousands of dollars
- He ordered Robert King be tethered and forced to pay child support
- There is a longstanding doctrine that judges cannot be sued for their decisions in court
- A judge upheld a lower court's ruling to this effect, but also said McCree's actions were 'often reprehensible'
'In our system, people are going to be unhappy when a judge renders a decision. And if a judge can be sued because the decision they made — in someone’s opinion — was right, wrong or unfair, then our system of justice doesn’t work,' Einhorn said, reports the Detroit Free Press.
King says McCree found favorably for his ex-wife because of his 'desires for sexual gratifications.'
THe court, while ruling that McCree cannot be sued by King, called McCree's actions 'often reprehensible.'
Michigan’s Supreme Court in March ordered McCree removed from office and suspended him for six more years if he’s re-elected in November.
The Detroit Free Press reports that McCree's father, Wade Hampton McCree, Jr was the first black person appointed to the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appleals and the second black solicitor general in the U.S.
Two Judges Draw Censures for Courthouse Sexual Affairs
My affairs with two married judges: Glamorous legal clerk's confession in £33m race case
She is claiming £33million for racial discrimination and victimisation.
Orlando J. Williams is also accused of forging loan documents to purchase a used car and of improperly spending settlement money earmarked for three children whose father died in a crash, according to disciplinary records released Wednesday through the Ohio Supreme Court.
Williams, who was appointed judge in 2009 and later served three years as a chief civil magistrate after losing his election bid, is named in the 10-page complaint filed by Scott Drexel, disciplinary counsel for the Supreme Court’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The board has the power to suspend or revoke the law licenses of attorneys.
A message seeking comment from Williams was not immediately returned. He now lives in Fairfield, in southwestern Ohio.
According to Supreme Court rules, Williams has an opportunity to respond to the allegations, or have a public hearing before a disciplinary panel in four to six months.
Williams, 57, abruptly resigned as a magistrate in July 2012 amid allegations that he had a sexual relationship with a woman whose eviction case had been pending in his court.
At the time, Williams denied to reporters that he was having a sexual relationship with the woman. He called her an acquaintance.
According to the disciplinary records, however, Williams did begin a sexual relationship with the woman soon after first meeting her when she appeared in court in March 2012 to answer the eviction notice.
Shortly after the hearing, Williams drove to the 25-year-old woman’s rental property and invited her for coffee, Drexel’s investigation shows.
“During the conversation, [Williams] flirted with [the woman] and referred to the [landlord] as a slum lord,” Drexel wrote.
Within days of the coffee meeting, Drexel contends, the two engaged in consensual sex. Williams failed to immediately recuse himself from the woman’s eviction case. She later left the rental property in April, but Williams held on to the case to determine damages due the landlord until late June.
As the Beacon Journal and other media were reviewing court records on the eviction and Williams’ potential conflict, he suddenly resigned as magistrate. He said his desire to return to private practice — and not his relationship with the woman — was the reason for resigning.
Four weeks before recusing himself, however, the woman was heard on a dash-camera video — taken May 20, 2012, while she was being arrested on a charge of drunken driving — urging a State Highway Patrol trooper to contact Williams, whom she twice refers to as her boyfriend.
Williams also is accused of forging loan records to inflate his salary in March 2013 to purchase a used sedan from Summit Toyota for $21,900. He did not reveal to the loan company that he had been fired from Byron Potts Co. days earlier, according to court records. The sedan was later repossessed.
He also is accused of withdrawing for his personal use about $11,000 from an account designated to be given to three minor children of a 26-year-old Akron man who died in a traffic crash in 2006. The account, which contained $11,496 in November 2012, now has about $321, records show.
Phil Trexler can be reached at 330-996-3717 or email@example.com. He can be followed on Twitter at www.twitter.com/PhilTrexler
Click here to read or leave a comment(s) on this story.