Adultery in New England
Love free or die
Time to check into the Motel New Hampshire
Because of NH divorce cases such as Brosor v Brosor, NH's much needed new rule article 1.25a went into affect in 2011. It states that all financial information must be exchanged within 45 days or 10 days before the first hearing, whichever comes first. But the majority very simply still proves that a single spouse is incapable of supporting themselves, and paying back in just 5 years, what was stolen from joint marital funds and assets, that accumulated from a 10, 15, 20+ years of marriage. Do the math. All what NH rule article 1.25a is now doing, is substantiating on record what one spouse will never fairly receive, that was stolen, which is their 50 percent due, pursuant to NH divorce laws. Thus, clearly proving one of the major problems here in NH has always been the lack of math skills and budgeting the state's funds.
Sadly, NH 's Supreme Court thankfully is the only supreme court that took until 2003, to finally open a 1960's Webster Dictionary to learn the definition for sexual intercourse. They proudly documented this event in the divorce decree for Blanchflower v Blanchflower. Evidently they bypassed the A's for "Another", the E's for "Equitable State", and the F's for "Fault Divorce" but were capable of finding the S's. The wife simply had an affair with a woman.
NH's adultery law also was clearly written stating, "sexual intercourse with another", and very clearly does not specify with one of the opposite gender. The definition for "another" is "one that is different and/or in addition to." In addition to, covers other forms of sex above and beyond sexual intercourse. Therefore, NH's adultery law has always very clearly acknowledged other forms of sex along with same sex adultery. This is the excused see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil law/rule that's been in practice by NH's very own superior criminal court Judge William J. Groff for 18 years, along with NH's very own Supreme Court for over 50 years.
He also had $45,000 in his bank accounts at the time of the relief hearing. He filed for divorce 4 days after catching the wife's private investigator, then took a weekend getaway for 2 with his and his co-workers shared mistress. He then cancelled the wife's cell phone to buy 5 new cell phones for his and his co-worker's shared mistress with 4 children by 3 separate fathers, all while this shared mistress was unemployed, on food stamps and other government aide. Who already divorced twice, while having these 2 marital affairs during the process of her second divorce.
He was also paying his mistress's mortgage and utilities simultaneously above the ones he had with his own wife. All while this shared mistress simply continued to commit NH Welfare Fraud. Simply by oops, not telling the government she was receiving now not 1 but 2 married additional incomes of $80,000 per year living under her roof for months. One right after the other, who now also was being supported by her government aide and food stamps. All while they filed for divorce, now in hopes that one would marry her, once their divorces were finalized. Well folks, one actually did. She chose someone else's husband, who simply paid her expenses over someone else's husband, who gave Her I.O.U's for her sexual favors. This is NH's version of a swinging sanctimony design for marriage that's been in practice for over 50 years that is only just a little "Irreconcilable Differences" in NH's divorce records.
This kind of accepting fiasco behaviors by NH's Family Judicial Branch has been costing your ever so increasing hard earn paid tax dollars in both, NH Welfare and Medicaid, in more ways than one, unnecessarily. All caused by NH's one and only family judicial branch. This by far is not 50/50 pursuant to NH Divorce Laws. But this clearly explains the problem's with NH's lack of I.Q. in bookkeeping and budgeting skills.
Because of all NH's Judges and Marital Masters history and continuous practice of, "See No Evil, Hear No Evil, And above all Speak No Evil" Fiascoes and court rulings, has now caused enough greater reason and concern throughout the years, to force NH State House Representatives, to vote to form a Redress Grievance Committee in 2010. Shocked by the numerous court files, proving NH's Judicial System is ignoring federal and state laws, with no legal accountability to enforce against these actions, forced NH legislators to vote to dismantle this committee a year later. However it did not stop a small group to continue this committee outside the state house. They are still presently continuing to collect NH court records, that are clearly supporting NH's Judicial Branch's illegal, and unethical ways of ruling. Still to this day, NH's family courts are literally taking lives unnecessarily. NH still claims to be an "Equitable State." Family court clerk records that go as far back as more than 50 years, supports the fact that they lied!
In 2010, was also the year that State House Representative Horrigan presented a bill to no longer have Adultery as a crime. He stated that the state's government has no business regulating what 2 "consenting" adults do with one another. Well just because 2 adults "consent" to do something with one another, still does not make it right or legal. However, it is also State House Rep. Horrigan who believes that people on government aide, should be allowed the right to purchase fire arms with their EBT Food Stamp Cards, if they "consent" to need one for safety. Well I for one, along with another ex wife, are very grateful that they cannot purchase fire arms simply with a food stamp card, given to what my ex husband's mistress was very capable of doing to others in the state of NH. The adultery bill failed in 2010. We also now have others who have been arguing that adultery is a moral issue and not a legal issue.
Many people have truly forgotten the real purpose for having laws in the first place. All laws in this country have always been, and will always be, on what was perceived to be morally based first, on a right from wrong to any living being and humanity. Secondly, people have also clearly forgotten that as long as our government regulates any laws and rules pertaining to our marriage licenses and divorce decrees, proves our government has already been, and will always be in the business of regulating our bedrooms, sex lives, and love lives, whether 2 adults are "consenting" or not. Thirdly, NH government needs to stop not "consenting" to doing the jobs they were entrusted to do, and actually "consent" to do the jobs they were actually delegated to do.
The NH Grievance Committee was clearly very much needed because their findings now not only supported clear cut evidence that not only did NH's Judicial Branch break NH's legislative laws, but also supported evidence, that the NH Judiciary Conduct Committee, the NH Bar Association Dispute Resolution Committee, and last but never shall be the least, the NH Supreme Courts Attorney Discipline Office, have all been only protecting their own kind! So why stop the domino's there NH? NH might as well just go to NH State Prisons, choose a few convicts, such as Pamela Smart for one, just throw black robes on them, then place them behind a courtroom bench!
"[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts. The rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law."
"2. The parties may redact (edit) all but the last four digits of any account numbers and social security numbers that appear on any statements or documents."
However, it is (OOPS!) against NH's law Title LXII Criminal Code Chapter 638 Fraud, Section 638:3 Tampering With Public or Private Record, and it even illegally goes (OOPS!) against the United State's Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1505 : US Code - Section 1505: Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.
Forgery and Fraudulent Practices Generally
"Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits; or Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress -Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both."
May 11, 2007
You don’t know me, my name is Laurie Nurnberg (NOW BROSOR). My children and I are friends with Roger. I met Roger through one of his co-workers. I’m writing in hopes of easing your mind in regards to my friendship with Roger. I tell you the honest truth when I say that Roger and I are good friends.(SHE STATES, "GOOD FRIENDS" INSTEAD OF "JUST FRIENDS!") Sometimes when I here Roger share his concerns, it seems to me that you’re wondering if our friendship is more than it is? I promise you that it is strictly and mutually platonic.
Jean, I know that you’re concerned about Roger sharing with me about his concerns at home in general. I can appreciate how you must feel. I think we all wonder if people dislike us based on what they have heard about us and what they believe is true. I can honestly say that I am a loyal friend to "ROGER" and I have genuine concern for you as a family. I want you to know that I’m not judging you. I don’t create opinions based on what I’m told; I like to meet people and get to know them. Men just don’t seem to have the gift of words like most of us woman do. When I was going through my divorce I was very scared that my husband didn’t love me anymore, therefore I was unlovable. Not true, he and I did love one another, we just spent our time hurting each with words and actions trying to prove the other wrong and ourselves right. In the end the only right answer would have been to have open and honest communication together with a qualified or pastor. But my husband didn’t have the courage to share his true thoughts and feeling out of fear and rejection.
In retrospect I wish I would have put ¼ of my energy into treating my husband the way that I wished he would have treated me, with respect an dignity instead of hiding behind fear and anger. I built up a wall so high around my heart made up of past hurts not forgiven, that my husband chose to give up and walk away rather than to “Talk it out.” My stored up pain and anger scared him away from our marriage because it was all that I ever showed him.
Talk about an average everyday compulsive liar. Written on The CD that she refers to as "on the family" was titled in Bold Green Marker, "WIFE SWAP" IN ALL 4 CORNERS OF THE CD JACKET! The CD itself had, "WIFE SWAP BUILD" WRITTEN ON IT! The following statements were made about me in emails written by Laurie to her married ex lover, who was my husband's co-worker and friend! Remember, I never met or spoke with this women once during these emails.
STEP 2. You will then find emails and voicemails telling you how this stranger really feels about you.
EMAIL ON JULY 25, 2007 TO THE CO-WORKER
EMAIL ON OCTOBER 12, 2007 TO THE CO-WORKER
* “I have been vengeful just like you and Jean are being right now towards Roger and I.” (You Think?)
EMAIL ON OCTOBER 30, 2007 TO THE CO-WORKER
* “You have helped a very destructive and sick woman.”
JUNE 14, 2007 EMAIL FROM LAURIE TO HER MARRIED EX LOVER:
"I can tell that you want to be able to have me believe that you love me and that being at work having this conversation isn't doing it.
I know and respect that your hands are tied financially, that's not it. (SURE! She needs medical coverage, and to house, feed, clothe 4 children and herself, while being unemployed, applying for disability, while having sex with multiple married men, and already on government aid and food stamps, while her house is in foreclosure!...00PS! Then she was investigated for Welfare Fraud for not telling them about the additional $80,000 married yearly income living under her roof, that she received and supported with her government aid, while they were divorcing their wives to marry her! Still with me so far? Believe me, boy do I know how difficult to keep up with all of this is! Only in NH folks, only in NH!) We shouldn't even be living together even if we were OK which we are not. What hurts the worst is that you aren't there for me. You always leave, walk away, go unavailable. I'm going through some tough stuff right now and are you the ones supporting me emotionally and thinking things through with me, telling me it's all going to be alright and I'm making the right choices? NO, Roger is!
I don't even feel like I can share with you how I feel about you and I without running away. Hell, Here I am, the stupid dependent enabler begging to be loved. How pathetic am I? I always choose Mr. Unavailable, that's you, you are so unavailable it isn't funny yet I cry for and miss you and somewhere deep in my heart I can't give up on you, I won't allow myself to believe that you are never coming to me. That's called denial. When I'm with you I feel great and hurt at the same time. When I'm around Roger things are just simple and I have a friend to talk to, laugh with and get stuff done.
Why can't you be that with me? Why do I have another married man just waiting to use me to end his shitty marriage? Will I let Him? (here's "My ego and Pride" thing again!)
(WELL, I GUESS WE CLEARLY ALL GOT THE ANSWER TO THAT ONE!)
JULY 1, 2007 EMAIL FROM LAURIE TO HER MARRIED EX LOVER:
"You are a hurting person and I forgive and ask for forgiveness from you for the past hurts to one another. I know that you have court tomorrow and I wish you well and I am praying that Gods grace is with you and you make the right choices for you and your family concerning your marriage.
I own my part in damaging your marriage. No one made me do what we did, I chose to go there freely. I would erase it and all the pain that I have caused if I could but I know I can't. I want you to know that I really truly did love you and I wanted to believe in you so bad that it felt impossible to give up. I had no business in your world and I didn't push you away hard enough.
I now get it. My power is in my beauty and by being emotionally available is how I allured you and others and by not shutting you down the moment I saw your interest is where I went wrong and you couldn't control yourself. I now know that I have that effect on men and that it is powerful. (Here's "My ego and pride" Thing again.)
Roger and I had a long talk today after church and we have decided to love one another only as friends. I won't do to him and his family what I did to you and yours. (Seriously now, REALLY?!?) I want to learn from my mistakes so that I can own my power and use it for good.
You were my second experience with attracting an addict who couldn't say no to me and my seductive ways. (Definitely "My ego and pride" thing again.)The more you poured on the charm, the more you baited me, the more I wanted to believe the lies that told yourself and me until I gave myself permission to sleep with you and fall in love with you. You already knew that I was vulnerable and needy and that given the right attention I would crack eventually. That's where God came in. You knew that if I believed that you had changed and you wanted the same things spiritually that I wanted that I would not be able to walk away and stand on my own. I thought that I had finally found what I was always looking for.
Today at RCC was an all kids lead worship. I thought of you and our dreams and how we met and how far this all got out of control and how I loved you and the promises I made to you in my own heart and I instantly knew that I needed to heal from all of this and (her 2nd ex husband). I knew that I couldn't and wouldn't do this to my sweet friend Roger. (Again, seriously now, REALLY?!?)
I learned about my power as a woman through you and Roger and I have I hope become a better person because of the experiences that we shared. I am looking squarely at myself, my mistakes, my past behaviors and my denial and I am analyzing all of it with full honesty. It is an ugly, disgusting mess. I fail so deeply at being a good person. I know that I am now failing you, hurting you, but I have to let you go. You need to have all the experiences you need to have in order to learn and I know that you are on the road of enlightenment and you will come out of this wiser. God loves you. His grace is sufficient and he is strongest when we are at our weakest. I admit that I am completely leaning on my Savior to get through. I hope you are too.
I sincerely apologize for hurting you. I had no business commenting about you being abusive because I too have been abusive in my behaviors and you have not been more wrong or bad than I. God loves and forgives us both and I praise him in the highest for that fact.
May God bless you tomorrow and always, please forgive me.
All to him,
This is the same woman who went to the co-worker's/wife's home on Christmas Eve to tell the wife that, "her marriage did not glorify God and that god placed it upon the husband's heart and hers to be together." She then broke off the affair six months later because she was already having another affair simultaneously with the co-worker's co-worker.
STEP 3. hire a private investigator and you will then be fortunate to even find out more.
OCTOBER 30, 2007 EMAIL FROM LAURIE TO HER EX MARRIED LOVER!
If you can do this I will consider possibly spending some time talking (?) with you. (definitely "My ego and pride" thing again!)
Enjoy your music,
OCTOBER 31, 2007 EMAIL FROM LAURIE TO HER EX MARRIED LOVER:
A friendship (?) with you would be so much better than what we now have.
Judge who had affair with man's ex-wife while overseeing his child support case cannot be sued, rules court
- Judge Wade McCree cannot be sued by the defendant of a child support case he presided over
- McCree had an affair with the ex-wife of the defendant while the case was before his court
- He sexted Geniene La'Shay Mott from the bench, had trysts with her in his chambers and gave her thousands of dollars
- He ordered Robert King be tethered and forced to pay child support
- There is a longstanding doctrine that judges cannot be sued for their decisions in court
- A judge upheld a lower court's ruling to this effect, but also said McCree's actions were 'often reprehensible'
'In our system, people are going to be unhappy when a judge renders a decision. And if a judge can be sued because the decision they made — in someone’s opinion — was right, wrong or unfair, then our system of justice doesn’t work,' Einhorn said, reports the Detroit Free Press.
King says McCree found favorably for his ex-wife because of his 'desires for sexual gratifications.'
THe court, while ruling that McCree cannot be sued by King, called McCree's actions 'often reprehensible.'
Michigan’s Supreme Court in March ordered McCree removed from office and suspended him for six more years if he’s re-elected in November.
The Detroit Free Press reports that McCree's father, Wade Hampton McCree, Jr was the first black person appointed to the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appleals and the second black solicitor general in the U.S.
Two Judges Draw Censures for Courthouse Sexual Affairs
My affairs with two married judges: Glamorous legal clerk's confession in £33m race case
She is claiming £33million for racial discrimination and victimisation.
Orlando J. Williams is also accused of forging loan documents to purchase a used car and of improperly spending settlement money earmarked for three children whose father died in a crash, according to disciplinary records released Wednesday through the Ohio Supreme Court.
Williams, who was appointed judge in 2009 and later served three years as a chief civil magistrate after losing his election bid, is named in the 10-page complaint filed by Scott Drexel, disciplinary counsel for the Supreme Court’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The board has the power to suspend or revoke the law licenses of attorneys.
A message seeking comment from Williams was not immediately returned. He now lives in Fairfield, in southwestern Ohio.
According to Supreme Court rules, Williams has an opportunity to respond to the allegations, or have a public hearing before a disciplinary panel in four to six months.
Williams, 57, abruptly resigned as a magistrate in July 2012 amid allegations that he had a sexual relationship with a woman whose eviction case had been pending in his court.
At the time, Williams denied to reporters that he was having a sexual relationship with the woman. He called her an acquaintance.
According to the disciplinary records, however, Williams did begin a sexual relationship with the woman soon after first meeting her when she appeared in court in March 2012 to answer the eviction notice.
Shortly after the hearing, Williams drove to the 25-year-old woman’s rental property and invited her for coffee, Drexel’s investigation shows.
“During the conversation, [Williams] flirted with [the woman] and referred to the [landlord] as a slum lord,” Drexel wrote.
Within days of the coffee meeting, Drexel contends, the two engaged in consensual sex. Williams failed to immediately recuse himself from the woman’s eviction case. She later left the rental property in April, but Williams held on to the case to determine damages due the landlord until late June.
As the Beacon Journal and other media were reviewing court records on the eviction and Williams’ potential conflict, he suddenly resigned as magistrate. He said his desire to return to private practice — and not his relationship with the woman — was the reason for resigning.
Four weeks before recusing himself, however, the woman was heard on a dash-camera video — taken May 20, 2012, while she was being arrested on a charge of drunken driving — urging a State Highway Patrol trooper to contact Williams, whom she twice refers to as her boyfriend.
Williams also is accused of forging loan records to inflate his salary in March 2013 to purchase a used sedan from Summit Toyota for $21,900. He did not reveal to the loan company that he had been fired from Byron Potts Co. days earlier, according to court records. The sedan was later repossessed.
He also is accused of withdrawing for his personal use about $11,000 from an account designated to be given to three minor children of a 26-year-old Akron man who died in a traffic crash in 2006. The account, which contained $11,496 in November 2012, now has about $321, records show.
Phil Trexler can be reached at 330-996-3717 or firstname.lastname@example.org. He can be followed on Twitter at www.twitter.com/PhilTrexler
Click here to read or leave a comment(s) on this story.