NH FAMILY COURT

REMEMBER YOUR NOT ALONE. Please contact your state house representative or THE CENTER FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES in NH. And watch SPEAK UP NH, who shows one NH Family Court case after another like Jamie Doherty's http://youtu.be/CIOXB21sBMY. You too can tell the public your experience with NH's Family Judicial Branch. NH's very own Family Court Records are proving that NH's Judicial Branch fully participates and supports Kidnapping and Domestic Violence; Real Estate Fraud, Mortgage Fraud, and Property Deed Fraud; Perjury, Falsifying Documents and Non Existing Issues, and above all, Obstruction of all Justice. Case file after case file showing all the evidence in multiple Family Court Records, that are filling the NH County Court Clerk Records Offices daily throughout the whole state! People are being visited by the FBI and THREATENED simply over a NH divorce case. You truly know the truth struck a nerve then. So become a part of the solution and bring them your court case file with your evidence of your experience with NH Family Court. Fear and Silence only continues to fuel what is already a corrupted government branch harming all those who pay their salaries. You are not alone. Numbers can truly speak louder than words!

Oct 11, 2018


Updated October 14 + 15, 2018

U.S. IS QUICKLY LEARNING WHAT NEW HAMPSHIRE HAS DEALT WITH FOR DECADES - CHOSEN DEAF EARS.


Life is a tragedy, confront it.

Life is precious, do not destroy it.


Life is life, so fight for it! 


                                   Mother Teresa


REALITY CHECK: Congress has impeached and removed only seven judges in the history of the federal judiciary.  Being the one and only very first judge to go in American history, was only once again, from the state of New Hampshire, when John Pickering, a NH district judge was convicted in 1804.  He was removed on charges of mental instability and for being a drunk on the bench, according to information from the Federal Judicial Center. 

Now in 2018, NH Judge Paul Moore, another NH judge,  committed fraudulent job reviews in attempts to attain over a million dollars in a retirement plan and a seat on the NH Supreme Court.  He now walked away a free man with a suspended jail sentence to enjoy a hefty retirement only paid from taxpayers hard earned paid tax dollars.  Does anyone see any resemblance to what's been going on here? It is almost ten years ago that I joined many people who have already brought forth the evidence that is being ignored by government.

For the past 214 years the NH's Judicial branch of government's own court records have only continued to conclude to support one fact.  And that is that the majority of NH justices have only shown numerous counts of exercising abuse of power with mental instability on record, along with a strong illiteracy in law, that only goes all the way up through the entire NH Supreme Court itself. 

This will only continue to destroy thousands of lives and families on a daily basis.  That now made generations of the main cause for NH's thousands of mental illness sufferers to this day, and now with only many more still to come.  There is and never will be any safe family unity, structure, or actual law, that will be legally and safely implemented by a NH government.



Roberts refers judicial misconduct complaints against Kavanaugh to federal appeals court in Colorado                                                                        

The Washington Post
October 11, 2018

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Wednesday referred more than a dozen judicial misconduct complaints filed recently against Brett M. Kavanaugh to a federal appeals court in Colorado.

The 15 complaints, related to statements Kavanaugh made during his Senate confirmation hearings, were initially filed with the federal appeals court in Washington, where Kavanaugh served for the last 12 years before his confirmation Saturday to the Supreme Court.

The allegations center on whether Kavanaugh was dishonest and lacked judicial temperament during his Senate testimony, according to people familiar with the matter.

Last month, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit asked Roberts to refer the complaints to another appeals court for review after determining that they should not be handled by judges who served with Kavanaugh on the D.C. appellate court.

In a letter Wednesday to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, Roberts said he selected the court in Colorado to “accept the transfer and to exercise the powers of a judicial council with respect to the identified complaints and any pending or new complaints relating to the same subject matter.”

The Denver-based appeals court is led by Chief Judge Timothy M. Tymkovich, the former solicitor general of Colorado who was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush. The 10th Circuit handled another recent judicial misconduct case from Washington involving the former chief judge of the District Court.

It is unclear what will come of the review by the 10th Circuit. The judiciary’s rules on misconduct do not apply to Supreme Court justices, and the 10th Circuit could decide to dismiss the complaints as moot now that Kavanaugh has joined the high court.

“There is nothing that a judicial council could do at this point,” said Arthur D. Hellman, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh and expert on the operation of federal courts.
He said it was unprecedented for a new justice to face such a situation. Hellman predicted that the 10th Circuit will likely close the case “because it is no longer within their jurisdiction,” now that Kavanaugh has been elevated to the Supreme Court.

The letter from Roberts does not mention Kavanaugh by name. On Saturday, Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson of the D.C. Circuit, who originally requested the transfer, said in a statement that the court had received complaints about Kavanaugh since the start of his confirmation hearings.

“The complaints do not pertain to any conduct in which Judge Kavanaugh engaged as a judge. The complaints seek investigations only of the public statements he has made as a nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States,” said Henderson, a Bush nominee.

Complaints made against judges are usually handled by the chief judge. Henderson took over from Chief Judge Merrick Garland, who recused himself from the matter.

When complaints were filed in late September and early October, Henderson dismissed some but concluded that others were substantive enough to refer to another judicial panel for investigation.

Roberts received the first transfer request on Sept. 20, followed by four additional requests on Sept. 26, Sept. 28, Oct. 3 and Oct. 5, according to his letter. He did not immediately move to refer the filings to another appeals court.

People familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity say the allegations had already been widely discussed in the Senate and in the public realm. Roberts did not see an urgent need for them to be resolved by the judicial branch while he continued to review the incoming complaints, they said.

The complaints landed with Roberts because of his role as chief justice of the United States, not because Kavanaugh is now a member of the Supreme Court.

Such complaints are usually confidential unless the judicial council investigating issues a public report about its findings.

The existence of misconduct complaints and the procedure can be disclosed, according to the rules, “when necessary or appropriate to maintain public confidence in the judiciary’s ability to redress misconduct or disability.”

The public nature of a case last year involving former 9th Circuit judge Alex Kozinski, who was accused of sexual misconduct, was unusual. The chief judge of the 9th Circuit asked Roberts to transfer the case for review after The Washington Post reported allegations against Kozinski.

Roberts referred the case to the appeals court in New York City. The judicial council of that court publicly announced it was closing its investigation because Kozinski had retired, saying that because he “can no longer perform any judicial duties, he does not fall within the scope of persons who can be investigated.”

U.S. JUDGES GET IMMUNITY NO MATTER WHAT THE CRIME IS, OR THE NUMBER OF CRIMES THEY COMMIT.  AGAIN, ARE WE SUPPOSE TO JUST STAY QUIET AND JUMP OFF A BRIDGE BECAUSE OUR GOVERNMENT JUST SAYS TO?