NH FAMILY COURT

REMEMBER YOUR NOT ALONE. Please contact your state house representative or THE CENTER FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES in NH. And watch SPEAK UP NH, who shows one NH Family Court case after another like Jamie Doherty's http://youtu.be/CIOXB21sBMY. You too can tell the public your experience with NH's Family Judicial Branch. NH's very own Family Court Records are proving that NH's Judicial Branch fully participates and supports Kidnapping and Domestic Violence; Real Estate Fraud, Mortgage Fraud, and Property Deed Fraud; Perjury, Falsifying Documents and Non Existing Issues, and above all, Obstruction of all Justice. Case file after case file showing all the evidence in multiple Family Court Records, that are filling the NH County Court Clerk Records Offices daily throughout the whole state! People are being visited by the FBI and THREATENED simply over a NH divorce case. You truly know the truth struck a nerve then. So become a part of the solution and bring them your court case file with your evidence of your experience with NH Family Court. Fear and Silence only continues to fuel what is already a corrupted government branch harming all those who pay their salaries. You are not alone. Numbers can truly speak louder than words!

Oct 16, 2018


APARENTLY NH NEEDS A STRONG REMINDER AND A REPOST
UPDATED 10/17 + 19/2018
THINK VERY CAREFULLY ON NH's CURRENT ISSUES WHEN YOU VOTE.  KNOW THE REAL CONDITION YOUR STATE IS IN BECAUSE LITTLE NH NOW IS THE No.1 STATE IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY WITH THE MOST NEW DIAGNOSED BREAST CANCER CASES AND MOST NUMBERS OF PEDIATRIC CANCER CASES CURRENTLY TO DATE IN THE COUNTRY!!!!


ILLEGAL ACTIONS FROM NH GOVERMENT
UPDATED MAY 27, 2018

FACT 1:: As of 2018, NH state is in contempt of court with the United States Department of Justice for it's failure  to comply with the 2012 agreement to invest $30 million in mental healthcare within the immediate following 2 years.  We are now 5 1/2 years later and in more of a crisis than ever before in TAX FREE NH!

In 2012, The state agreed to spend an additional $6 million in the current budget, plus an additional $23.7 million in the next two-year spending plan. The resources will support more round-the-clock care for people in crisis, as well as more community housing and employment opportunities.

FACT 2: NH is also in contempt of court once again for, "Multiple NH Hospitals sued New Hampshire and settled. NH is facing a budget shortfall of up to $36 million following a federal district court decision over hospital payments, setting up a high-stakes scramble among state officials to negotiate a solution ahead of a May 31, 2018 payment deadline.


“They did not carry in the budget enough for the obligation,” said Scott O’Connell, an attorney representing a group of hospitals. “So somebody is going to be shorted.”

The issue stems back to the 2017 budget process. Last year, the Legislature set aside $166 million for the state’s uncompensated care fund in Fiscal Year 2018. That figure relied on a new payment formula from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) that allowed for lower payouts, even as hospitals warned the formula was improperly established and would be challenged in court.

"On March 6, responding to a multi-state lawsuit, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia handed down a ruling siding with the hospitals. The decision voided the CMS formula nationwide, putting New Hampshire back on the hook.

Now, the state’s hospitals are pushing for the full sum they say is owed – about $237 million – $71 million more than has been budgeted, according to Senate President Chuck Morse, R-Salem. Roughly half of that would come from state funds, with the rest paid through a federal match.

John Formella, legal counsel for the governor’s office, confirmed Friday that the upper limit that could be owed by the state amounts to “approximately $36-37 million per year in fiscal years 2018 and 2019.”

And in an April 10 letter to the hospitals provided to the Monitor, Deputy Attorney General Ann Rice acknowledged that the March 6 decision created new obligations.

“The state fully intends to follow the law in the amount of DSH payments that will be made by May 31, 2018,” Rice wrote to O’Connell, referring to the “disproportionate share hospital payments” owed by the state. May 31 is the federally-mandated payment deadline to hospitals under the Medicaid law."


FACT 3. Reported back in February 2015,
"This isn’t the first time lawsuits have put a crunch on the state budget.

A. The state was forced to spent $38 million in the current spending plan to build a new women’s prison after a class action lawsuit filed by female prisoners.  Upon completion the total cost was $50 million.

B. Lawsuits over school funding stretched out for decades when towns said the state was shortchanging them on aid, costing the state millions after the ruling in the so-called Claremont suits of the 1990s.




Claremont School District v Governor of New Hampshire is an important legal case in New Hampshire. In the mid-1990s, the city of Claremont, New Hampshire started a process against the State of New Hampshire, challenging the constitutionality of the New Hampshire allocation of school funding.

The Claremont lawsuit was brought on behalf of five school districts that could not afford to properly fund their schools based on local property taxes. This was the second suit of this nature against the State of New Hampshire. The first suit was brought in the early 1980s and was settled when the State agreed to contribute 8% of the cost of education to a fund targeted to aid poor districts. The formula by which the money was distributed was designed by Professor John Augenblick and was called the Augenblick formula.


The State never fully funded its promise and by 1989 Claremont's high school, Stevens High School, had lost its accreditation because the district could not keep up with needed repairs. The then chairman of the Claremont school board, Tom Connair, caused the parties to reinstigate their lawsuit and three lawyers were hired, Arpiar Saunders, John Garvey and Andru Volinsky.


In 1993, the New Hampshire Supreme Court interpreted Part II, Article 83 of the New Hampshire Constitution to guarantee students a right to a public education. In 1997, the New Hampshire school funding system was found unconstitutional and the legislature and governor were ordered to define the components of a constitutionally adequate education, cost them out and pay for them with taxes that were equal across the state.


Four governors and their legislatures refused to comply with the Court's orders leading the Supreme Court to once again find the school funding system unconstitutional in September, 2006, leading Gov. John Lynch to try, unsuccessfully, to amend the state Constitution.


The Claremont petitioners have been represented since 1995 by John Tobin, Scott Johnson and Andru Volinsky, all of Concord, New Hampshire."


C. Dover school district v New Hampshire: In 2016, "a superior court judge has ruled that the state’s cap on adequacy grants to public schools is unconstitutional.

The lawsuit, brought by the city of Dover and its school district, means an extra $1.4 million for Dover, and a potential boost for nearly 40 other communities with caps on the amount of "adequacy funding" they receive.

The heart of the ruling goes back to the state Supreme Court’s rulings in the Claremont school funding case that began in the 1980s. The court ruled in part that the state has a constitutional duty to define an adequate public education and pay for it.

In fiscal years 2009 and 2010, state law directed the state Department of Education not to "distribute a total education grant on behalf of all pupils who reside in a municipality that exceeds that municipality’s total education grant for the 2009 fiscal year by 15 percent."

The cap did not affect Dover the first year,
but it has ever since, for an estimated total of $14.2 million, according to the ruling.


"Curbing the amount of the grant deprives Dover of the full amount of what the legislature deemed necessary to sufficiently fund the opportunity for an adequate education in Dover," Tucker wrote. "When this occurs, the school district is left short of funds to pay the cost of an adequate education and either must make do with the amount of state aid allotted or make up the shortfall on its own. Either outcome violates Part II, Article 83, because the state ‘has the exclusive obligation to fund a constitutionally adequate education’ and ‘may not shift any of this constitutional responsibility to local communities’ ..."

Andru Volinsky, an attorney representing Dover, said the next step is to engage the state and legislative leaders to work out a payment agreement.

Gov. Maggie Hassan said she agreed with the attorney general’s position when the lawsuit was filed last year, that funding levels for certain school districts in 2016 "were not legally defensible."

"The Superior Court’s decision today reaffirms the validity of concerns raised by communities about school funding levels as well as the Attorney General’s original determination," Hassan said in a statement.

Hassan criticized the Legislature, saying, "
I continue to call on the Legislature to meet our state’s obligation to pay these districts the money they are owed under the law, and my door is open to legislative leadership from both parties to discuss a way forward."

In a joint statement, Senate President Chuck Morse, R-Salem, and House Speaker Shawn Jasper, R-Hudson, said the Legislature is leading the way on education funding, including a plan to eliminate the
(illegal) cap entirely in fiscal year 2018." 


Don't hold your breath.  Let's just wait and see, shall we?

D. In 2014, the state had a financial stake in 28 lawsuits, according to the state’s annual financial report. Of those, the state only lost one, won six and settled three. Eighteen are still undecided.

“This isn’t a problem of costs coming up unexpectedly, this is a problem of not being able to pay our bills when they come due and the Legislature seeing how long it can dodge the bill collector,” said Andru Volinsky, the lead attorney on the education funding lawsuits."

If I can clearly research these problems with a brain injury that was only inflicted by the state of NH's government to begin with, then what the hell is NH's government's real excuse now going to be!?!?!?!?!?!

What Can One Only Say Other than It's NH

Cartoon showing a couple runningNH's Unstable Genius government has caused and made their own "Vietnam Wars" throughout the years, exactly the same as our so called "Stable Genius," President Donald Trump has done.  This is what truly became family values in the state of New Hampshire for decades to come. 




The evolution of the human species has definitely evolved but not at all for the better.  Despite the fact that there has been a NH educational structure for well over 30 years teaching safe sex, instead of abstinence makes a body healthier and live longer, clearly has now proven to be less than adequate education for our children. Even to the point of actually now literally going in one ear and out the other. 

As of 3 years ago, our little New England granite state among many, was historically recorded to have had close to 60,000 NH members, including several government officials, who were poetically listed on the "Ashley Madison - Life Is Short, Have An Affair," Website Breach.  Which coincidentally was also suddenly publicly breached  just several months after NH had recklessly just decriminalized adultery altogether on January 1, 2015.  NH still remains adultery lawless to this day.  Then again, this is NH, the state who must always live by their motto, "Live Free Or Die " trying to.

And here is why:

REALITY CHECK:
Congress has impeached and removed only seven judges in the history of the federal judiciary.  And their very first one was only once again, from the state of New Hampshire, when John Pickering, a NH district judge was convicted in 1804.  He was removed on charges of mental instability and for being a drunk on the bench, according to information from the Federal Judicial Center. 

Now in 2018, NH Judge Paul Moore, another NH judge,  commits fraudulent job reviews in attempts to attain over a million dollars in a retirement plan, while also attempting to attain a seat on the NH Supreme Court. 


He now walked away a free man with a suspended jail sentence to enjoy a hefty retirement only paid from taxpayers hard earned paid tax dollars.  Does anyone see any resemblance to what's really going on throughout this country? It is almost ten years ago that I joined many people who have already brought forth decades of evidence that is being ignored by NH government.

For the past 214 years the NH Judicial branch of government's own court records have continued to only conclude to support one fact.  And that is that the majority of NH justices have only shown numerous counts of exercising abuse of power with mental instability, and it is all on record. 

Along with a strong illiteracy in law, that only goes all the way up through the entire NH Supreme Court itself.  This is what  only continues to destroy thousands of lives and families on a daily basis.  Now it has only produced generations of the "main cause" for thousands of NH mental illness sufferers with no solid mental healthcare structure in place to this day to help them survive what NH government is inflicting.  And now with only many more to still come.  There is and never will be any safe family unity, structure, or actual law, that will be legally and safely implemented or enforced by a NH state government.



FOR 17 YEARS - NH DIVORCE RATES HAVE BEEN HIGHER
THAN THE ENTIRE NATIONAL AVERAGE DIVORCE RATE

NEW HAMPSHIRE'S RESPONSE:  KEEP CUTTTING
THE  NH JUDICIAL JUSTICE SYSTEM's BUDGET

NH STATE IS ONLY 190 MILES LONG AND ONLY 50 MILES WIDE.  FOR NH TO BECOME A STATE CAPAPABLE OF DOING MORE DAMAGE THAN THE ENTIRE NATION ON ANY LEVEL IS UNFATHAMOBLE.

Provisional number of marriage and divorce rate (2000-2016) CDC

New Hampshire v United States Marriage and Divorce Rates 2000-2016 [Rates are based on provisional counts of marriages by state of occurrence.  Rates are per 1,000 total population residing in area. Population enumerated as of April 1 for 2000 and 2010, all other years are estimated as of July 1]


    YEAR                  NEW HAMPSHIRE         UNITED STATES      NH  RATE OF       U.S. RATE OF
                                        MARRIAGES               MARRIAGES               DIVORCE            DIVORCE
   2016                                       7.O                         6.9                        3.4                           3.2
  
   2015                                       6.9                         6.9                         3.3                           3.1
  
   2014                                       7.2                         6.9                         3.5                           3.2
  
   2013                                       6.9                         6.8                        3.7                            3.3
  
   2012                                       6.8                         6.8                         3.6                           3.4
      
   2011                                       7.1                         6.8                         3.8                           3.6

   2010                                       8.3                         6.8                         3.8                           3.6
     
   2009                                       6.5                         6.8                         3.7                           3.5

   2008                                      6.8                          7.1                         3.9                           3.5

   2007                                      7.1                          7.3                         3.8                           3.6
   
   2006                                      7.2                          7.5                         4.1                           3.7
  
   2005                                      7.3                          7.6                         3.9                           3.6
  
   2004                                      8.0                          7.8                         4.0                           3.7

   2003                                      8.1                          7.1                         4.1                           3.8
  
   2002                                      8.3                          8.0                         4.3                           3.9
  
   2001                                      8.5                          8.2                         4.4                           4.0

   2000                                      9.4                          8.2                         4.8                           4.0        

Going as far back as a century, having sexual intercourse with others, other than just your spouse or just a very significant other, is clearly only considered as no real cause to divorce, or even separate here in NH, according to it's government.  To be even more specific, it has been illegally according to the entire NH judicial branch of government, going all the way up to the NH Supreme Court itself. That is only until the so-called impeccable proof of the claimed adultery committed, also now comes with impeccable proof that it is actually also now the unquestionable "main cause" to even divorce. Seriously? And even after all that, it even also has to also support all and any impeccable proof from any reasonable doubt it even occurred.  Now enforcing the one and only fact that adultery only is clearly caused by the spouse who doesn't commit it according to NH justices!!!!!  Gee, how long did it actually really take NH justices to make all that up?  Well, apparently those long black robes have been in use for more ways than one in NH.

First, Let me begin by clearly thoroughly showing you what NH judges do with the evidence to begin with. At my Relief Hearing, my husband's attorney, Richard C Follender, came to court with nothing but an empty briefcase, a pad of paper, and a pen.  He proudly told Superior Criminal Court Judge Groff that his client (my husband) is unable to pay any alimony, let alone even be capable to afford his own place to live, and therefore he is currently moving from house to house between family and friends, and now needs the homestead to be sold because of it. 


When my attorney immediately asked Judge Groff, "Then where is she suppose to go?  What is she suppose to do?"  He did not answer her. Then she suddenly pointed to my husband and his attorney and firmly said, "Their lying!"  Judge Groff then suddenly grew a backbone, and became agitated when he asked, "do you have any proof?"  While confidently but very arrogantly already presuming the answer will just be NO.  Given the fact that he already knew how thorough most Court Attorney''s evidence truly is.  Only Just exactly like Follender's empty briefcase, when they come to court


She then suddenly lifted up a private investigators report along with several of my husband's past year end pay stubs in her hand, that already supported his yearly income for the past several years.  That also showed $25,000 to $30,000 more than what he claimed and submitted on his financial affidavit, which again was false.  So her firm answer was, "yes, we have a private investigators report!"  Judge Groff immediately but silently swallowed down hard and only quickly wrote a few notes in his notebook  He then just ended the hearing while just saying he will make a decision. He then immediately stood up and walked out of the courtroom without taking any of the evidence in hand that he even requested to further review.  We left with all the evidence that we still came with. 


The only mortgage against the house belonged to my husband alone for his purchase of my sister's half of our family home. I already owned my half mortgage free for a year.  I was court ordered to live out of my car only on a income of $164 weekly gross. His only and final decision was to deny me alimony while he now was ordering my home to be sold out from under me, while placing the profits of the sale into escrow for the 2 years that it then took to go to trial. This was all decided from just a 15 minute hearing and no evidence. He denied me means to pay rent, utilities, food, transportation, medical and any prescriptions that were necessary to prevent heart attacks, strokes, and blood clots while only living on my $164 weekly gross income, after 4 years of dating and 21 years of marriage.


The damage was already done by the time my divorce even finalized in 2009.  I ended up having a massive stroke a few years later from blood clots in both of my lungs and also in the right frontal lobe of my brain.  I was then immediately flown from Southern NH Medical Center, Nashua NH, to Mass General Hospital in Massachusetts by helicopter for emergency brain surgery to only now hopefully remove a blood clot safely after being diagnosed.  And it was not without further complications. 


I ended up needing an additional 3 more emergency surgeries that also required 12 more additional blood transfusions and an entire month of transferring me by ambulance between 4 different hospitals and multiple surgeons between 2 different states, New Hampshire and Massachusetts. At only 50 years old, it took me months only just to partially rebuild my strength on my left side, and regain my ability to even have the ability to speak again, let alone walk on my own again, or be allowed any career again. This was purposely inflicted on me only by a disgruntle future ex spouse and all of NH's government, who was already well known for making repetative deadly mistakes!!!!!!!!!!. 


Now, I am permanently disabled from intermitted short term memory loss, and forced to live on $937/ monthly disability for the rest of my life because of my government.  I am only 1 of hundreds of thousands each year that are now forced unnecessarily mind you, into a position of now requiring payment to survive on NH taxpayers hard earned paid tax dollars.  All caused from the very government, who purposely placed me and many others in this position in the first place. And it was all just so my husband could now support and marry his co-workers second hand used up, already twice divorced, sharing unemployed welfare fraud committing mistress, who had 4 children, already fathered by 3 different men. 


A women who commits welfare fraud now with only multiple married men and even simultaneously at that.  According to the NH Judiciary Conduct Committee, I had no case against Judge Groff when I called and reported what happened in a 15 minute hearing requesting temporary alimony.  This is what true family values are and what real NH justice is and would be, for you and/or your children if need be!  Do you really think your children are truly safe living in NH?


Judge Groff, is only one of many NH judges, especially the entire NH Supreme Court, who very much enjoys his abuse of power by making up many of their own insane personal but clearly illegal ideas just exactly like Judge Kavanough when it pertains to laws, family values, and even sex on a daily bases.  8 hours a day, 7 days a week.  So just be extremely great-full that our medical professional standards are extremely much higher and not identical to NH's judicial standards.

"French kissing doesn't amount to sexual contact under New Hampshire law, according to Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge William Groff.  Judge Groff dismissed a felony sexual assault charge against a city teen-ager, finding that sexual assault laws don't cover kissing with the tongue.   The young man faced a charge of felonious sexual assault, involving a 6-year-old girl


State law defines sexual contact as intentional touching of sexual or intimate parts.  The tongue, Judge Groff ruled, is neither sexual nor intimate.  He reasoned that the tongue is neither sexual nor intimate and wrote, "A tongue is not related to sexual relations, nor is it private. A tongue is displayed daily by the average person in speech and other conduct."


"To accept the state's definition of tongue as an 'intimate part," Groff wrote, "would result in a person potentially committing a felonious sexual assault by touching a person's tongue with a finger."

The judge further reasoned that French kissing (a 6 year old girl mind you!) can't be considered sexual contact under state law "even if done without consent and even if done for the purpose of sexual gratification."




"In 1989, Groff also overturned a convictions of a Lowell, Mass., man, who was found guilty of sexually assaulting a young boy in Nashua because the boy used the word “bum” rather than “anus” in his testimony.  Because of the potential ambiguity of the word “bum,” Groff found that the boy’s testimony wasn’t enough to prove sexual penetration.  Months later, this same man pleaded guilty to sexual assault charges involving the same boy, only now in the state of Massachusetts."

In 1 of many family court rules that the NH State Supreme Court has written, was in 2010, that was a much needed well overdue mandatory family court rule. It demands that all debts, property deeds, bank statements, retirement plan statements, investment statements, all life insurance statements and medical coverage policies, with a specific time period required for each, to all be submitted to the courts within 45 days of the filing.  But then in this very same rule, it clearly then suddenly states, "2.  The parties may redact all but the last four (4) digits of any account numbers and social security numbers that appear on any statements or documents."  Are you kidding me???  Not only does this sentence defeat the purpose of the entire rule to begin with, but it most certainly breaks NH state law along with the United States Codes for the entire country.  This is nothing more than lazy careless illegal justice in the state of NH.

Title LXII - CRIMINAL CODE
Chapter 641 - FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
Section 641:7 - Tampering With Public Records or Information.


Universal Citation: NH Rev Stat § 641:7 (2015)

    641:7 Tampering With Public Records or Information. – A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if he:
    I. Knowingly makes a false entry in or false alteration of any thing belonging to, received, or kept by the government for information or record, or required by law to be kept for information of the government; or
    II. Presents or uses any thing knowing it to be false, and with a purpose that it be taken as a genuine part of information or records referred to in paragraph I; or
    III. Purposely and unlawfully destroys, conceals, removes or otherwise impairs the verity or availability of any such thing.

Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973.

Title LXII - CRIMINAL CODE
Chapter 638 - FRAUD
Section 638:2 - Fraudulent Handling of Recordable Writings.


Universal Citation: NH Rev Stat § 638:2 (2015)

   
638:2 Fraudulent Handling of Recordable Writings. – A person is guilty of a class B felony if, with a purpose to deceive or injure anyone, he falsifies, destroys, removes or conceals any will, deed, mortgage, security instrument or other writing for which the law provides public recording.

Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973.


18 U.S.C. § 1505 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees



Social Monogamy is actually a term used to refer to "creatures that pair up to mate and raise their off-springs but still will have flings on the side,"  A true monogamous mammal is a goose that will never mate again even if it's mate was killed. 



Daniel Kruger, a Social and Evolutionary Psychologist at the University of Michigan's School of Public Health was noted to say, "like most mammals, we are a polygamous species." 

(However another said, "medically speaking, more and more every day, we are beginning to show signs of one of the higher causes that will end up bringing us to our own demise.")

Another professor of sociology at the University of Washington Seattle, Pepper Schwartz, was noted saying, "I don't think we are a monogamous animal." 



There are roughly 5,000 species known to form a lifelong bond and the majority of humans are definitely not one of them.



According to Stressgen Biotechnology's research, HPV is only one of the most common STD's transmitted in the world.  HPV is also 'THE' major risk factor now for more than one cancer that might take years to show.

The papilloma virus lives in the cells of the outer skin as well as inside the body, mainly in the vagina, anal, and urethra. HPV can show no visible skin changes while hiding inactive infections that can only be detected microscopically within the skin cells.  And it is only found by using special tests that only specifically look for HPV-DNA. When screening for STD's is done, this test is not included, When condoms are not completely covering the entire shaft of the penis or pubic skin, hidden and inactive papilloma cells can transfer and pass from a man's pubic area into the vagina, vulva, and anus simply through a skin to skin contact.



According to the CDC, 79 million Americans, now mostly in their teens and 20's, are infected with HPV.  Studies conducted by the Kaise Foundation initially found out that 70% of Americans knew nothing about HPV as a sexually transmitted disease, and they did not know one very important fact.  That it cannot be detected by common regular STD screening.  This is becoming a very serious problem in more ways than one.



to find out the numbers of HPV-Attributed cancers, multiply the number of HPV associated cancer by the % of probably caused HPV cases. This is how to find out the number of HPV-Attributed Cancer totals.



   NUMBER OF HPV-ASSOCIATED CANCERS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE BETWEEN 1999 TO 2013       

                                No. of HPV                  % of cases Probably                      No. of HPV 

  Cancer Site     Associated cancers              Caused by HPV                   Attributed cancers          

   Anus                            309                 X                  91%                      =                     281 

   Oropharynx                 954                                     72%                                             687

   Cervix                          624                                     91%                                             568 

   Vagina                           49                                     75%                                               37

   Vulva                           248                                     69%                                             171

   Penis                             67                                     63%                                               42                   

   TOTAL                       2,251                                                                                      1,786                 
  
                                                                                                      
Number of New Hampshire STD's Reported By Year Between 2012 to 2016
By The NH Division of  Public Health Services
__________________________________________________________________          
YEAR       Chlamydia   Gonorrhea      Syphilis               HIV                 AIDS          TOTAL_STD'S     
  2012             3,070           148                   49                    47                     27                   3,341
  2013             3,132           118                   45                    35                     17                   3,347
  2014             2,311           230                   54                    38                     16                   2,649
  2015             3 ,687          247                   45                    23                     15                   4,417
_2016             4,038           467                   71                    41                     22                   4,639          
TOTAL         16,238        1,210                 264                  184                     97                 18,393          

Children are also being infected by STD's at a younger age in NH now.  Between 2012 to 2016 the state of NH had a total of 16,238 cases of chlamydia reported from all age groups throughout the state.  However, the report broke it down and surprisingly showed that there actually were 4,170 cases between the ages of 13 to 19.  While 7,228 cases were diagnosed between the ages of 20 to 24.  And an additional 2,673 cases were diagnosed between the ages of 25 to 29 years of age.  There were only 2,167 cases that were spread out between the ages of 30 to 60+ yrs of age.  Safe sex today is only having extremely minimal to no sex partners meaning no more than 1 or 2 in a lifetime.

                                          NH CHLAMYDIA CASES                                                          
                        NUMBER OF    NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF
                        CASES  FOR    CASES FOR   CASES FOR    CASES FOR    CASES FOR       
AGE GROUP          2012               2013                2014                2015                  2016                    
   13 - 19                   923                 824                  573                  890                    960
   20 - 24                  1,354              1,450               1,026               1,612                 1,786  
   25 - 29                  455                  474                  372                  659                    713                    
 TOTAL                   2,732              2,748               1,971               3,161                 3,459                  

With Chlamydia patients, all of their sexual partners must be notified and treated with antibiotics, even if they don't show or experience any symptoms.  This will prevent any long-term complications or further spread of the infection onto others. 

Untreated Chlamydia in women, or Pelvic Inflammatory Disease infections in females can cause vaginal irritation, vaginal discharge, lower abdominal pain, painful intercourse, bleeding between menstrual cycles, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, fever, infertility or ectopic tubular pregnancies.

Untreated Chlamydia in men can cause discharge from the tip of the penis, a burning feeling during urination, or Epididymitis, which is an inflammation of the coil tubes in the back of the testicles.  This can result in testicular swelling, pain, and also yes, can even cause infertility too.

                                           NH GONORRHEA CASES                                                     
                        NUMBER OF    NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF
                        CASES  FOR    CASES FOR   CASES FOR    CASES FOR    CASES FOR       
AGE GROUP          2012               2013                2014                2015                  2016                    
   13 - 19                   25                    9                     27                    31                      48             
   20 - 24                   47                    39                   66                    74                      106
   25 - 29                   39                    22                   60                    40                      92                      
13 - 29   Totals       111                   70                  153                  145                    246                     
30 - 60+ Totals        37                    48                   77                   101                    220                     

In 2016 is when NH had an outbreak of Gonorrhea showing that the number of cases became significantly higher by 250% in just one year and remained actively working to identify individuals who have been exposed.  According to the CDC, Gonorrhea is the second most common reported STD in the United States.

In 2017, NH reported that 15% of individuals diagnosed with Gonorrhea did not initially receive the correct treatment.  Treatment of Gonorrhea needs to include 2 different antibiotic to prevent the emergence of antibiotic resistance.  The CDC listed gonorrhea as one of the top 3 national antibiotic resist threats because of the propensity of Neisseria Gonorrhea to develop a resistance to antibiotics.

One of NH's responses to the STD outbreaks was May 9, 2017, with NH law RSA 141-C:15-a - The practice of EPT- Expedited Partner Therapy is explicitly legal and allowable according to NH.  EPT refers to a healthcare provider who gives their STD infected patient additional antibiotics or an additional antibiotic prescription to now give to the patients partner also.  So they too can be treated without the provider ever needing to examine the partner first. 

However there are numerous parents and physiciams who don't agree.  Every case is different and they feel that the state is being reckless by irresponsibly enabling and detouring many young adults from responsibly seeking their own providers for an accurate diagnoses and treatment so as to always establish and have a proper medical record history on file, that could very well save their life one day.

                                  NH INFECTIOUS SYPHILIS CASES                                           
                        NUMBER OF    NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF
                        CASES  FOR    CASES FOR   CASES FOR    CASES FOR    CASES FOR       
AGE GROUP          2012               2013                2014                2015                  2016                   
   13 - 19                       0                     2                       2                     2                        1
   20 - 24                       8                     6                      10                    6                        7  
   25 - 29                       7                     5                       3                     7                       10                    
13 - 29   Totals           15                   13                    15                    15                      18                    
30 - 60+ Totals           34                   32                    39                    29                       53                   

                                                                NH HIV CASES                                                              
                        NUMBER OF    NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF
                        CASES  FOR    CASES FOR   CASES FOR    CASES FOR    CASES FOR       
AGE GROUP          2012               2013                2014                2015                  2016                    
   13 - 19                       1                      1                     1                      1                        0
   20 - 24                       7                      4                     7                      5                        5   
   25 - 29                       6                      8                     5                      2                        6                    
   13 - 29   Totals        14                    13                   13                     8                       11                   
  30 - 60+ Totals         33                    21                   25                    15                      30                   

                                                                NH AIDS CASES                                                           
                        NUMBER OF    NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF   NUMBER OF
                        CASES  FOR    CASES FOR   CASES FOR    CASES FOR    CASES FOR       
AGE GROUP          2012               2013                2014                2015                  2016                   
   13 - 19                      0                       0                      0                      0                        0            
   20 - 24                      1                       2                      1                      2                        0  
   25 - 29                      3                       0                      2                      2                        3                  
   13 - 29   Totals        4                       2                      3                      4                        3                  
   30 - 60+ Totals       33                     21                    25                    15                      30                 


ALERT: NH AT 'HIGH RISK' OF UNCONTROLLED
HIV, HEPATITIS C DUE TO IV DRUG USE

NH Department of Health and Human Services
Government Health and Wellness
May 18, 2018

"CONCORD, NH – The state’s Public Health Division  on Wednesday issued an alert to care providers around the state describing a notable increase in the number of new HIV and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cases in Hillsborough County.

Of recent concern, NH DPHS has been investigating a report of a homeless individual in Manchester who shares injection drug equipment, and has been diagnosed with acute HIV infection with a very high HIV viral load, which increases risk of transmission.

The alert was issued to physicians, health care providers, hospitals and health clinics.

New Hampshire’s annual number of new HIV cases has been stable (approximately 30-40 cases per year); however, Hillsborough County is experiencing a significant increase in the number of new HIV cases among those who report injection drug use as a risk factor.
  • From January 1, 2017, through April 30, 2018, there were already 46 NH residents newly diagnosed with HIV.
  • Of the 46 individuals, 11 (24 percent) reported injection drug use, a majority of whom lived in Hillsborough County at the time of their diagnosis.
Symptoms of Hepatitis C, according to the CDC, include:
  • Fever
  • Fatigue
  • Loss of appetite
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Abdominal pain
  • Dark urine
  • Clay-colored bowel movements
  • Joint pain
  • Jaundice (yellow color in the skin or eyes)
DPHS is continuing to investigate and identify contacts who may be at risk. HCV infection is also a major risk for individuals who inject or use intranasal drugs. New diagnoses of HCV infection were made provider reportable to the NH DPHS in 2016. Of all the new diagnoses of HCV infection in New Hampshire residents from November 1, 2016 to present, 85 percent reported ever injecting drugs (current or former), and almost 65 percent report current injection drug use as a risk factor.

Because new diagnoses of HCV infection are only reported to the NH DPHS by providers (no laboratory reporting of positive test results is performed), there has been significant underreporting of new HCV infections. We are asking providers, both primary and referral providers, to report new cases of HCV infection to the NH DPHS using the appropriate case report form.

Key Points and Recommendations for providers
  • New Hampshire is at high risk of uncontrolled HIV and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission due to the opioid epidemic and injection drug use.
  • Providers should screen all patients who present to clinical care (regardless of the primary purpose of the visit) for substance use disorder, especially injection drug use.
  • Individuals who have a history of substance misuse (especially injection drug use) should be tested for HIV and HCV.
  • There have been multiple state outbreaks of hepatitis A virus infection associated with individuals who are homeless and individuals who use injection and non-injection drugs. All health care providers should assess for hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity in these higher risk patients and provide vaccination if not immune.
  • All new diagnoses of HIV and HCV should be reported to the New Hampshire Division of Public Health Services (NH DPHS), including preliminary positive or rapid-reactive HIV and HCV results, by utilizing the appropriate forms.
  • If a provider (primary or referral provider) is unsure if a new HIV or HCV case has been reported to NH DPHS, please err on the side of re-reporting. NH DPHS does not receive laboratory reports for positive HCV tests, and relies on provider reporting of new HCV diagnosis for accurate counts." 
Another major issue is the one fact that while all this is happening, New Hampshire also felt the sudden reckless need to decriminalize Adultery altogether back on January 1, 2015.  Then coincidentally just several months later, the Ashley Madison's, " Life Is Good, Have An Affair" website breach pops up, now publicly shaming and divulging close to 60,000 New Hampshire members on their website that was now hacked and divulged to the rest of the world.  

"Avid Life said that reports of its imminent demise were "greatly exaggerated," and cheaters continued to use the site more than ever -- even though 32 million of its members' identities were revealed in the massive data breach.

The hack was bad enough, but the information revealed as part of the breach was pretty damning for the company. The list of names appeared to show that upwards of 95% of Ashley Madison's members were men.  that were on the website at the time of the hack."

This was anything but a resolution to a clear existing age old problem.  So we really don't need to look very far to find out why its happening or who is dong it now do we.  NH judges can clearly no longer claim, "there's no evidence of adultery here!"   

NH ALSO STILL CONTINUES DECADES LATER WITH CONTINUAL PROBLEMS WITH PUBLIC DRINKING WATER AND PRIVATE WELLS - THAT STILL TO THIS DAY REMAINS HIGHLY QUESTIONABLY SAFE FOR DECADES TO COME

According to the American Cancer Society's Cancer Statistic Center there will be another estimated 8,080 new cancer cases in New Hampshire with an estimated 2,810 deaths statewide in 2018.

CANCER CLUSTER THREATENS 10 NH SEACOAST TOWNS

In February 2014, a cancer cluster within the NH 10 towns Seacoast area involved two rare pediatric cancers that killed several seacoast children, that were identified and confirmed by the state Department of Health and human Services. 

In 2016, it was also determined by the Department of Health and Human Services officials that there was a small cancer cluster of rhabdomyosarcoma, or RMS.  While looking at the RMS cases, the state also identified “a small excess of pediatric lung cancer cases,” all of which “were of a single rare type called pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB).”

In 2017, no common exposures were found linking the cancers according to DHS.  "State Epidemiologist Benjamin Chan acknowledged there were seven brain or central nervous system pediatric cancers detected in the towns of Rye, New Castle, Portsmouth, Greenland and North Hampton during a period when they expected to see 3.1. He determined this did not represent another cancer cluster because the cancers were different types of brain cancers."


Dr. Tom Sherman, a former state representative from Rye who chaired the Seacoast Pediatric Cancer Cluster formed by then-Gov. Maggie Hassan said he believes, “it’s a complete mistake to feel terribly reassured by anything we’ve learned so far.”  Many NH parents of children diagnosed with cancer strongly believe there may be an unknown environmental cause that is triggering the illness.  “The lack of knowledge does not equate to safety,” Sherman said.   

Research was done by the task force committee that was established by then-Governor Maggie Hassan.  Contamination was found leaching from a 27-acre Superfund cleanup site in North Hampton and Greenland, named Coakley Landfill, which raised serious concerns by the task force.

"Tests done on wells at the landfill have found PFAS chemicals and 1,4-dioxane - both suspected carcinogens - at levels above the Environmental Protection Agency’s health advisory levels. PFAS chemicals in Berry’s Brook at the edge of the dump tested dramatically higher than the EPA’s health advisory levels.

State Rep. Mindi Messmer, D-Rye, who chaired a subcommittee on the landfill, noted during a recent interview that the Coakley landfill “lies geographically right smack in the middle of this cancer cluster.”


Nearby residential wells and wells at golf courses have pulled the water from under the landfill’s cap, Messmer said.


“We found that these PFCs were contaminating the water in the landfill and migrating into other areas in the towns of North Hampton, Hampton, Rye and Greenland,” Messmer said. “That’s why we’re investigating it.”


Studies on PFAS chemicals have determined they could also cause low birth weights, harm a child’s development and increase cholesterol, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry."


"Messmer said she’s learned about four cases of adult RMS in the Rye area. “That’s highly unusually that adults will get RMS,” she said.   She’s also learned about two adult onset cases of RMS in Merrimack."


  
CANCER CLUSTER THREATENS ANDOVER, NH

In 2014, there was also another analysis done on a potential cancer cluster concern in Andover, NH that was "prepared by GM Monawar Hasain MD PHD, The NH Department of Human and Health Services, Data Management, and NH State Cancer Registry."

It stated that The NH State Cancer Registry received a perceived elevated cancer incidence concern for Andover NH on August 1, 2012.  The report stated, "After Discussion with individuals reporting the concern, it was determined that the concern did not meet the base criteria to initiate a cancer cluster investigation and no specific environmental exposures could be identified (though general concerns regarding community water system was expressed).  Therefore a formal detailed cancer cluster investigation was not initiated...Additionally, after review of the water quality data, we found no evidence of regulatory violations in the community water system serving Andover Village."

The analysis also reported that, "It has been further estimated that there are approximately 72,000 persons living in NH (2014) with even more cancer cases now.  Overall in NH, cancer incidences and mortality has been decreasing over the last several years."  However, the truthful facts are according to the American Cancer Society stating there would be an estimated 41,570 new cancer cases in NH between 2011-2015.  But according to the  CDC, they were actually only 40,032 new cases in NH during that time period.  

The Estimated Number Of (All Cancer Sites) New Cancer Cases In NH Per Year 
Reported By The American Cancer Society are shown below

                        Estimated Number of                                       Estimated Number of
Year            New NH Cancer Cases              Year              New NH Cancer Cases 
                                         
  2006                      6,470                                  2012                           8,350
  2007                      7,140                                   2013                           8,470       
  2008                     7,030                                   2014                           8,450
  2009                     7,630                                   2015                           8,090
  2010                      7,840                                  2016                           8,680
  2011                       8,210                                  2017                            8,670

For a 12 year period alone there was an estimated total of 95,030 new cancer cases estimated in NH by the American Cancer Society. 

CANCER CLUSTER IN MERRMACK, NH

Another cancer incident has now also been reported for Merrimack, NH in January 2018.  The report  stated,  "In February 2016 low levels of PFOA, approximately 30 parts per trillion (ppt), were found in tap water supplied by the Merrimack Village District (MVD) public water system. A subsequent investigation into environmental contamination surrounding the Saint-Gobain plant led to findings of drinking water contamination in private and public water supply wells in the surrounding communities. The current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (US EPA) lifetime Health Advisory for PFOA levels in drinking water is for PFOA and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) levels combined to not exceed 70 ppt in drinking water (U.S. EPA 2016a). To date, levels of PFOA and PFOS combined in Key Findings.

"The Saint-Gobain plant has been operational since the 1980’s. It is not possible to know when contamination of the public drinking water supply began, or the past levels of contamination. Preliminary results of the NH DHHS MVD Community Exposure Assessment have shown that out of the 217 randomly selected residents on the MVD public water system who had their blood tested for various PFCs, only PFOA was found at higher levels than typically seen in the general U.S. population. This is consistent with the existence of a known source of PFOA exposure through drinking water ingestion." 

"In February 2016 low levels of PFOA were detected in the Merrimack Valley District public water supply. Some studies have found associations between PFOA and certain types of cancer.  More research is needed to determine whether PFOA causes cancer and what types of cancers it may cause.  Cancers associated with PFOA were not found to be higher in Merrimack.  The DHHS will continue to monitor rates of cancer in Merrimack NH."

"There have been two studies on the same Greenland Inuit population which found some associations between PFOA and breast cancer. The first study of Greenlandic Inuit women found that women with breast cancer had a higher PFOA level than women without breast cancer, but this difference was not statistically significant when other exposures that could potentially cause cancer were taken into account (Bonefeld-Jorgensen et al. 2011)."

"A follow-up study on the same population of Greenlandic Inuit women found some associations between breast cancer and higher blood levels of some PFCs, including PFOA (Wielsøe1 et al. 2017). Despite these two studies, multiple other studies of PFOA workers exposed to high levels of PFOA (Gilliand and Mandel 1993; Leonard et al. 2008; Lundin et al. 2009; Steenland and Woskie 2012; Raleigh et al. 2014) and communities exposed to lower levels have found no connection between PFOA and breast cancer (Vieira et al. 2013; Barry et al. 2013; BonefeldJorgensen et al. 2014).  There is very limited or no evidence for PFOA being connected with any other cancer." 

Between 2005 to 2014 Merrimack NH had a population between 25,604 to 26,660 people.    Within a 9 year period, 1,331 people were diagnosed with cancer just in Merrimack, NH alone.
______________________________________________________        
Merrimack, NH                                                                                                             Significant                                                Was                          Was
Cancer Type/Site                              Observed                Expected                                       Difference 

Oral Cavity and Pharynx                            28                          33                    Not significantly different
Esophagus                                                 20                          18                    Not significantly different
Stomach                                                    13                           14                   Not significantly different
Colorectal                                                  115                         101                 Not significantly different
Liver and Intrahepatic                               12                           15                    Not significantly different
Pancreas                                                   30                           30                   Not significantly different
Gall Bladder                                              5                             5                     Not significantly different
Larynx                                                       9                            10                    Not significantly different
Lung and Bronchus*                                138                         152                  Not significantly different Mesothelioma                                           6                             5                     Not significantly different

Females Only: 
Breast                                                       197                         203                  Not significantly different Cervical                                                     5                            8                      Not significantly different Uterus                                                       55                          49                    Not significantly different Ovary                                                        17                          18                    Not significantly different

Males Only: 
Prostate*                                                 198                          173                  Not significantly different Testis                                                       8                              9                     Not significantly different
Bladder                                                    79                            68                   Not significantly different
Kidney and Renal Pelvis                         51                            41                   Not significantly different
Brain and Other CNS                              22                            20                   Not significantly different Thyroid                                                    52                            41                   Not significantly different
Hodgkin Lymphoma                                5                              8                     Not significantly different
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma                        48                            54                   Not significantly different
Kaposi Sarcoma                                     5                              5                     Not significantly different
Multiple Myeloma                                   14                            15                    Not significantly different
Leukemia                                               43                            36                    Not significantly different
Melanoma of Skin                                  61                           75                     Not significantly different
Other Cancers                                       95                            95                    Not significantly different

as of 2018, NH is now the No.1 state with the highest rate of breast cancer in the country. but has also yet again, define the source of cause as to why this is happening.

Reported on March 9, 2016, "Weitz and Luxenberg and Erin Brockovich broadened their investigation into regional water contamination, announcing they will begin looking into the recent detection of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in the local drinking water of Merrimack, NH. The announcement comes after the consumer advocate and law firm started similar investigations in New York and Vermont.

“Almost every week a new community learns its drinking water is no longer safe,” said Erin Brockovich. “We have to put an end to this crisis, step up our investment into vital infrastructure and see a greater enforcement of the Safe Drinking Water Act.”


Representatives from the company Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics recently notified the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services that PFOA was detected in water samples taken from four water faucets within its Merrimack facility, which is served by the Merrimack Village District Water System. Chronic PFOA exposure has been linked to testicular cancer, kidney cancer, thyroid disease, high cholesterol, ulcerative colitis and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Studies suggest other health consequences include a possible connection to pancreatic cancer.


“It is tragic to see yet another community impacted by PFOA contamination,” said Robin Greenwald, head of the Environmental and Consumer Protection Unit at Weitz and Luxenberg. “We have decided to expand the scope of our drinking water investigation to understand the health risks to residents of Merrimack and provide the community with robust legal options. And, once again, as in Hoosick Falls, NY, St. Gobain appears to be the entity responsible for the contamination.”


Ms. Brockovich and Weitz and Luxenberg recently filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. and Honeywell International Inc. on behalf of Hoosick Falls, NY residents who have been drinking water contaminated by PFOA. The case was filed after local residents reported falling ill after drinking and cooking with this water.


In addition, Ms. Brockovich and Weitz and Luxenberg recently announced an investigation into suspected causes and consequences of PFOA water contamination affecting Petersburgh, NY, and North Bennington, VT."

While all of this is happening, NH Governor, Chris Sununu already clearly gave us NH government's opinion on these current issues in his February 15, 2018 State Of The State Address:

"As we look back on this past year and recognize our milestones and achievements, we cannot lose sight of New Hampshire's future."

GOD PLEASE HELP US ALL

Well at lest we now have an idea where NH drug dens are actually located throughout the statehouse in NH.  But please lets not forget the homeless crisis, opioid addiction crisis, and  the lack of mental healthcare crisis that continues to still dominate a domino effect of a never ending increase to NH's 'suicide crisis' now still continuing throughout the state now for the past 3 decades.  Which is now another whole saga and chapter alone in NH.   And NH's government's repeated excuses are that all of this is?  Well, "these problems exist throughout the rest of the entire country!"  So if NH's government clearly tells everyone to suddenly drive off a cliff tomorrow, just because the entire country is now doing it, apparently you will now clearly understand why and where it came from, the NH government.

To truly show how consciencous NH's government really pays attention towards the state's problems, while in serious crisis mode, NH even attempted on 3 different occasions to now numb the voters to their existing problems by voting to lower the drinking age to 18 while all of these issues still remained in a negative progression still even 3 decades later.  Not just only once, not even just twice, but 3 individual times and thankfully by the grace of god they failed each time.  NH continues to have multiple addiction crisis plans and mental healthcare plans one right after another that quickly tends to only immediately fail early on in the process.

In 2006, NH came up with another poor plan to end homelessness.  This one was arrogantly titled the "ten year plan to end homelessness in NH," that drastically once again began to fail just 2 years into it. Gee, was this idea from the rest of the country too? In 2008, in Manchester alone, the 10 year plan defined 1,500 as homeless, for which 400 were children alone.  Then 10 years later over 1,700 people had to be treated by the city of  Manchester's $1.5 million healthcare program for the homeless"Elissa Margolin of Housing Action NH contends that the state needs to do more to increase the supply of affordable housing."

"According to Margolin, Vermont has bonded $35 million in addition to another $10 million a year later.  Maine bonded $50 million in 2010, and every year had committed between $6 million and $12 million to affordable housing. And Massachusetts bonded $1 billion over 5 years. "We (NH) came in with the chamber of commerce and asked for $25 million and only got $2.5 million." 

Business Insider combined six measures of labor-market and general economic health for all the states and the District of Columbia. By putting all those on a common scale and combining them, they came up with an overall score for each state's economy.  Now because NH refuses to pay their promises, debts and needs to the state for the past 50 years.  In a state where the average weekly wages declined 1.2% between August 2017 and August 2018.  Now has become the third-worst rated economy among the 50 states and DC.  

When your state's government becomes well known through the united States Justice Department only for bootlegging liquor to continue to very poorly and illegally rob Peter to pay Paul, just to continue to keep running from bill collectors, for repeatedly making broken promises, while breaking more than just one law in the process; exactly what else would the final outcome be of the domino games that NH continues to play?

Just FYI: NH state law does require municipalities to help people who are destitute.  Including those who are otherwise unable to obtain shelter. Not that any actual law in NH state would actually be enforced by the government itself.  However, while the NH Supreme Court recklessly continues to write, inflict, and enforce, non existing laws and illegal rules that only continue to break actual NH state laws, then you can surely most certainly not expect, anything less or better from the rest of NH's entire government.  If I can clearly find and see these problems with a brain injury that was only purposely inflicted by the state of NH's  government's own stupidity, then what the hell is their excuse now!?!?!?!?!?!




No comments: