Domestic Violence is a crime that the NH Family Courts are now openly supporting on record. Judges Pamela Albee and Lucinda Sadler may truly have something to prove in an "All Boys School", but clearly have taken it too far to do so. To even have one NH Judge supporting parents arrested for Domestic Violence, is one to many. Cleveland Ohio is evidence of that. Ariel Castro, age 52, was one of the suspects identified in the Cleveland Ohio kidnapping of Amanda Berry, Gina DeJesus, and Michelle Knight. He was arrested for Domestic Violence in 1993, but a grand jury dropped the charges and he pleads guilty to disorderly conduct. The results of these actions became too high a price to pay for not one, not two, but for 3 young girls.
Clearly there is a big difference between Ohio and New Hampshire. Their Judicial System did not physically place these teens in Castro's hands and then leave them there after the fact the violence has been done. Judge Lucinder Sadler has been scrutinized and rightfully so, for wrongful rulings in multiple child custody cases. As they say, if it walks and talks like one, then it clearly must be one. Judge Sadler handed custody of Jamie Doherty's son to his father, based only on the one clarification she stated in court, "He said...she said...somebody get me some evidence."
Well, Judge Sadler wants evidence? She got evidence! Just a little over a month ago the father and his girlfriend went before the courts. They both were charged with Domestic Violence, both Court ordered into anger management classes, and each fined $500. Well clearly the child support that Judge Sadler ordered Ms. Doherty to pay, would not be going to the child's needs, if paid to the father. On May 10, 2013, Judge Sadler held another hearing on this case. The father and his girlfriend were now unsurprisingly a no show, but his attorney shows up now with his mother instead! She informs Judge Sadler, that her client was not given sufficient notice for this hearing to inform his employer. However, a 3 weeks notice is clearly sufficient time for any responsible attorney to properly inform the courts of any necessary changes required by her client.
When Ms. Doherty, who is Pro Se, requested to have her mother sit with her during this hearing, Judge Sadler denied her request. When Ms. Doherty requested a continuance because of the fathers absence, her request was denied without findings of facts or ruling of law. When Ms. Doherty insisted and demanded a continuance once again, Judge Sadler then denied Ms. Doherty's request, stating they can do a conference call with the father, who was now presently at work for his employer. Who now supposedly was not permitting the father's absence in the first place. But would now supposedly permit his employee, to handle the situation by phone from work? There was no conference call. Well, once again stupidity clearly only is, as stupidity clearly does and gets! It still remains to be seen what Judge Sadler will do with Ms. Doherty's other custody case within her hands.
If NH doctors and hospitals ever began to practice their field in medicine, the same as NH Judges and the majority of NH Lawyers practice their field in law, the malpractice suits alone would permanently be shutting doors to any medical treatment or needs throughout the state. The irony of this case is that once upon a time, Judge Sadler just simply gave custody of Ms. Doherty's eldest child, to the child's father, Elwood McLlarky, just simply based on hearsay alone, and without even speaking to Ms. Doherty to hear her side. When Ms. Doherty supported her argument in court with his police records, Judge Sadler immediately overturned her ruling and gave custody back to Ms. Doherty.
To acknowledge ones mistake and attempt to correct them is all anyone can ask of one. However, Mr. McLlarky then decided to move up to the Conway NH region. He then premeditatedly kidnapped his daughter, simply enrolled her in school, then filed for custody and won. Unlike Judge Sadler at the time, Conway NH's Judge Albee was not against his criminal record and his multiple Domestic Violence records, past, present, or future. Judge Albee referred to the multiple Domestic Violence incidents as "Ups And Downs" that "Benefited Emily and provided stability in her life." Oh, I kid you not. This was quoted directly from Judge Albee's rulings.
When Ms. Doherty went public 2 months ago with her custody case, only then did Judge Albee quickly make the quick decision to run for the NH hills. She quickly closed the case, once again, stating non existing evidence, that was never documented in the 6 years of this case, as findings of facts or ruling of laws, leaving the child permanently in the father's Domestic Violence custody, never to see her mother again. Unlike Judge Albee, Judge Sadler still can choose to correct her mistakes, as she has proven to do so in the past, to do right by these children. Will she do so still remains to be seen.
Update: Two separate cases, two different children, two separate fathers, but the same outcome. Like Judge Albee, Judge Sadler strongly supports her views on Domestic Violence, but in the silent way, and will do so in NH Court records no less. Her ruling rattled on about Ms. Doherty and her "legal issues" (with Judge Albee) and once again, allot of, "he said..", and "she said...", but she completely ignores one major piece of evidence.
She now avoids mentioning anything about the father's current and latest arrest. She fails to mention the results from the court hearing on it just held within the previous month. This was one hearing he showed up for while being absent and excused by Judge Sadler, from multiple hearings concerning his son. She fails to mention one word about the father's neglectful absence from multiple court hearings. She purposely fails to mention him being charged along with his girlfriend for Domestic Violence. Not one word of concern mentioned for the child's safety, whom she placed in the father's custody, based only on his hearsay alone. Not one word of concern about him and his girlfriend's current court order into anger management classes, or being fined $500 each! These are the people whom she just simply placed custody of a young boy with, because of her clarification she stated in court, "He said... she said...will somebody get me some evidence!" When she finally gets her evidence, she ignores it completely.
When Ms. Doherty informed Judge Sadler of the father's latest arrest for Domestic Violence, his attorney just simply asked Judge Sadler, "what does that have to do with this case?" I've said it before and I'll say it again. Who truly needs a Psychological Evaluation and Parenting assessment done now? Well NH, do you really think Amanda Berry, Gina DeJesus, and Michelle Knight would agree right now, with NH's Justices and lawyers, placing children in the custody of Domestic Violence? NH Justices will only just say, hush little children and don't you cry!
Clearly there is a big difference between Ohio and New Hampshire. Their Judicial System did not physically place these teens in Castro's hands and then leave them there after the fact the violence has been done. Judge Lucinder Sadler has been scrutinized and rightfully so, for wrongful rulings in multiple child custody cases. As they say, if it walks and talks like one, then it clearly must be one. Judge Sadler handed custody of Jamie Doherty's son to his father, based only on the one clarification she stated in court, "He said...she said...somebody get me some evidence."
Well, Judge Sadler wants evidence? She got evidence! Just a little over a month ago the father and his girlfriend went before the courts. They both were charged with Domestic Violence, both Court ordered into anger management classes, and each fined $500. Well clearly the child support that Judge Sadler ordered Ms. Doherty to pay, would not be going to the child's needs, if paid to the father. On May 10, 2013, Judge Sadler held another hearing on this case. The father and his girlfriend were now unsurprisingly a no show, but his attorney shows up now with his mother instead! She informs Judge Sadler, that her client was not given sufficient notice for this hearing to inform his employer. However, a 3 weeks notice is clearly sufficient time for any responsible attorney to properly inform the courts of any necessary changes required by her client.
When Ms. Doherty, who is Pro Se, requested to have her mother sit with her during this hearing, Judge Sadler denied her request. When Ms. Doherty requested a continuance because of the fathers absence, her request was denied without findings of facts or ruling of law. When Ms. Doherty insisted and demanded a continuance once again, Judge Sadler then denied Ms. Doherty's request, stating they can do a conference call with the father, who was now presently at work for his employer. Who now supposedly was not permitting the father's absence in the first place. But would now supposedly permit his employee, to handle the situation by phone from work? There was no conference call. Well, once again stupidity clearly only is, as stupidity clearly does and gets! It still remains to be seen what Judge Sadler will do with Ms. Doherty's other custody case within her hands.
If NH doctors and hospitals ever began to practice their field in medicine, the same as NH Judges and the majority of NH Lawyers practice their field in law, the malpractice suits alone would permanently be shutting doors to any medical treatment or needs throughout the state. The irony of this case is that once upon a time, Judge Sadler just simply gave custody of Ms. Doherty's eldest child, to the child's father, Elwood McLlarky, just simply based on hearsay alone, and without even speaking to Ms. Doherty to hear her side. When Ms. Doherty supported her argument in court with his police records, Judge Sadler immediately overturned her ruling and gave custody back to Ms. Doherty.
To acknowledge ones mistake and attempt to correct them is all anyone can ask of one. However, Mr. McLlarky then decided to move up to the Conway NH region. He then premeditatedly kidnapped his daughter, simply enrolled her in school, then filed for custody and won. Unlike Judge Sadler at the time, Conway NH's Judge Albee was not against his criminal record and his multiple Domestic Violence records, past, present, or future. Judge Albee referred to the multiple Domestic Violence incidents as "Ups And Downs" that "Benefited Emily and provided stability in her life." Oh, I kid you not. This was quoted directly from Judge Albee's rulings.
When Ms. Doherty went public 2 months ago with her custody case, only then did Judge Albee quickly make the quick decision to run for the NH hills. She quickly closed the case, once again, stating non existing evidence, that was never documented in the 6 years of this case, as findings of facts or ruling of laws, leaving the child permanently in the father's Domestic Violence custody, never to see her mother again. Unlike Judge Albee, Judge Sadler still can choose to correct her mistakes, as she has proven to do so in the past, to do right by these children. Will she do so still remains to be seen.
Update: Two separate cases, two different children, two separate fathers, but the same outcome. Like Judge Albee, Judge Sadler strongly supports her views on Domestic Violence, but in the silent way, and will do so in NH Court records no less. Her ruling rattled on about Ms. Doherty and her "legal issues" (with Judge Albee) and once again, allot of, "he said..", and "she said...", but she completely ignores one major piece of evidence.
She now avoids mentioning anything about the father's current and latest arrest. She fails to mention the results from the court hearing on it just held within the previous month. This was one hearing he showed up for while being absent and excused by Judge Sadler, from multiple hearings concerning his son. She fails to mention one word about the father's neglectful absence from multiple court hearings. She purposely fails to mention him being charged along with his girlfriend for Domestic Violence. Not one word of concern mentioned for the child's safety, whom she placed in the father's custody, based only on his hearsay alone. Not one word of concern about him and his girlfriend's current court order into anger management classes, or being fined $500 each! These are the people whom she just simply placed custody of a young boy with, because of her clarification she stated in court, "He said... she said...will somebody get me some evidence!" When she finally gets her evidence, she ignores it completely.
When Ms. Doherty informed Judge Sadler of the father's latest arrest for Domestic Violence, his attorney just simply asked Judge Sadler, "what does that have to do with this case?" I've said it before and I'll say it again. Who truly needs a Psychological Evaluation and Parenting assessment done now? Well NH, do you really think Amanda Berry, Gina DeJesus, and Michelle Knight would agree right now, with NH's Justices and lawyers, placing children in the custody of Domestic Violence? NH Justices will only just say, hush little children and don't you cry!
NEED I SAY MORE?
APPARENTLY YES!
8 comments:
Clearly ALL New Hampshire JUDGES NEED PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS AND PARENTING ASSESSMENTS DONE! Where the hell is the governor and why have NH politicians sat back and just watch these crimes against our children. Ohio and every other state should be ashamed of New Hampshire! The fact that this is happening in the United States of America is a disgrace to it's country and it's people!
I have a fairly shocking story, my own, of a disabled father of three who, because of the following inept judges, has made my life a living hell for 3.5 years and scraping to survive each month, trying to raise 3 children.
Not only is Derry Family Court obscenely backed up, has some of the rudest employees on the planet, but the "justice" that goes on in their divorce court is laughable. Both family law judges:
Hon. Lucinda Sadler, and Paul S. Moore should be disbarred.
In my case, they have disallowed evidence, simply refused to look at it, acted unprofessionally, berated me for no reason, and ruled in such a way that breaks NH state laws.
I have been awarded to pay child support, as a disabled man, to a woman who is working, that is NOT supporting her kids. I even pay $250 MORE a month than what the State calculator on their own website came up with. I house 2 of the 3 children 100% of the time, and the 3rd, 70% of the time, but I PAY CHILD SUPPORT TO HER. She spends the money on herself, NOT her children, and I've been fighting this decision for 3 years now. They continuously "sit on" my motions for months on end, then after all that time, deny it with a "one" line they took from the opposing counsel. I wish I was making this up. They literally CUT AND PASTE a line from the opposing council and use that "argument" to deny my case with zero justification or acknowledgement of the facts in my case. They amount of evidence I have provided to them wasn't even reviewed.
So again, this court rules that I am to pay child support to a woman that does NOT house my children, nor take care of them, NOR pay for their day to day needs. *I* handle ALL vision, medical, housing, dental, school, sick days, school vacations, summer vacation, and cannot even work because I have a disability AND that I cannot leave them unattended during the day, but again, I pay HER child support INSTEAD of receive it.
This court is a JOKE. An obscene joke.
Judge Sadler stole my daughter from me. Based only on hearsay. Monster
Lucinda Sadler sat on a civil case wherein the Defendant was sued for denying access to tax refund. The other party was clearly involved in Probate estate fraud. While her ruling wasn't a win for the Plaintiff she clearly did find cause against the Defendant but couldn't award damages as it was really an IRS issue that should've been dismissed on jurisdictional grounds - it was clear Lucinda wasn't impressed with the Defendant. As far as child custody rulings I can't say anything either way or otherwise as I've never dealt with these cases with her as judge. I will say the real Judge that needs to go or shpuld be retired is Richard Hampe who was trafficking kids to Penn State with ties to Epstein. Two of which had ties to Fairbanks scandal victim families aiding genocide so NH wouldn't have to pay out victim funds. Hampe helped kidnap kid in another state in California and sent her to Penn State officials. https://twitter.com/TheBlackSheDog/status/1055828628943069184?s=19
NH ring-leader running child trafficking rings to pedophiles tied to Penn State and Epstein and even to Dubai. The cause for Boston Marathon bombing is linked to this Judge ==> https://twitter.com/TheBlackSheDog/status/1055828628943069184?s=19
Probate estate fraud and now attempted murder to cover-up NH links to international pedophile ring. https://twitter.com/TheBlackSheDog/status/1055828628943069184?s=19
could you all email me about sadler. going through same things
sunshineunderground2019@gmail.com
especially person who lost kid from heresay
Had her for judge for divorce 2004-presant.
I gave her fact and proof of his neglect and abuse both verbally and mentally, had doctor's notes even teachers wrote letters to this judge. The X come in with nothing says kids are his life can't eat can't sleep even lost his license from a DWI,
This mean self centered judge let this man call me every name under the sun from crazy to bipolar to insane and I've lost my skull. But no proof no facts nothing she gave the man the only car ( has no licence duh DWI) stop completely stops his child support payments until he got back on his feet, but also this guy claimed to love miss and need his kids like 50% of the time, so that's what she did have him Monday, Wednesday, Friday and every othet weekend.
Guess how much he actually saw and still sees his kids. Only evey other weekend and only if it suits him, never saw his daughter graduate highschool or did any of those things that would hold my ex in contempt. Why, cause it would still be a fight. The money my ex accumulated while not paying a dime cause he was malnurished and skinny which was due to his own drug use, that she never looked up or saw or if she did care his arrest and assault record. No to top it off she said I could NOT take my kids out of the town of derry or I would be held in contempt. She gave her faith and trust into the wrong parent and to this day pays bare minimal for child support, and always claimed his cousin and that side of the family knew this judge and was a family friend. Wich looking back at her judgements they NEVER went my way but always did go in his favor.
Remember she stopped child support but that he would owe back pay, which he did owe back pay, he took back 3 times to have what had accumulated from him NOT paying dropped lower and lower and lower. Then this guy takes a job making $9. While he got another amount off the books. I believe it was 2010 when he went back to CDL driving I was making nothing he was definitely paying nothing but he had a house and brand new car truck and oh was he working, working so much he barely saw his kids oh but he did pay that sad little calculated amount that you set. Nothing more but definitely sometimes less. But see in your eyes he saw his kids all those days you said he should see them, only he didn't. There was work and his second family and friends that are and still is easy more important than the very kids whose parents both scared stood before you looking for answers, answers you as a judge was to give not bias not one way and certainly not unfair.
While the one trying to tell you their story you took it upon yourself to feel pity for the other that stood before you, and once he saw you give that you were his to play with!
Tried to get away from this judge she denied me that. I finally asked her if I did something to piss her off
Wanna know what she said to me
This judge said to me well you called him an alcoholic,
I said let it be known to the courts that I did NOT say that and I wanted her to rewind the tapes and reread what was said. ... What I did say was that while the kids are in his custody (everyo weekend) he drinks excessively and I fear for my kids. But in her mind she twisted the whole statement around to suite her unjustified judgements SMH
I bet she does go out to lunch with my ex's family totally disrespect from that judge not sure how she is still one either
Post a Comment