NH FAMILY COURT

REMEMBER YOUR NOT ALONE. Please contact your state house representative or THE CENTER FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES in NH. And watch SPEAK UP NH, who shows one NH Family Court case after another like Jamie Doherty's http://youtu.be/CIOXB21sBMY. You too can tell the public your experience with NH's Family Judicial Branch. NH's very own Family Court Records are proving that NH's Judicial Branch fully participates and supports Kidnapping and Domestic Violence; Real Estate Fraud, Mortgage Fraud, and Property Deed Fraud; Perjury, Falsifying Documents and Non Existing Issues, and above all, Obstruction of all Justice. Case file after case file showing all the evidence in multiple Family Court Records, that are filling the NH County Court Clerk Records Offices daily throughout the whole state! People are being visited by the FBI and THREATENED simply over a NH divorce case. You truly know the truth struck a nerve then. So become a part of the solution and bring them your court case file with your evidence of your experience with NH Family Court. Fear and Silence only continues to fuel what is already a corrupted government branch harming all those who pay their salaries. You are not alone. Numbers can truly speak louder than words!

Apr 13, 2019

WHAT YOU GET FROM A TAX FREE STATE

Updated: April 16, 2019
The No. 1 leading cause of death in New Hampshire is still cancer for the past five years.  The second leading cause of death is by drug overdose, and the third is, but now never will be the least is suicide.  

Clearly dying of just old age or natural causes in one tiny state of New Hampshire has become extremely low on the government totem pole to the point of extinction.  It is clear that the rest of the country is suffering too, but at a much different and lesser rate than one tiny New England state.  Even to the point of remaining in a silent state of emergency now for 4 decades.

Being the 4th smallest state in the country now, only with a total population that's less than 1.4 million people, that only is living on a land mass that's even lesser than just 10,000 square miles, has become shocking for some, that the state is only very capable of just exceeding an entire country's poor conditions and environment.

Even with many changes in state governor's and their administrations throughout the years, along with having the largest legislature in the country, NH continues to only be capable to succeed in surpassing the nation in anything that doesn't count most in life, on a daily basis. 

Because without good health, a stable strong mentality, sustainable drinking water, food, affordable housing, and education, everything else becomes completely useless and insignificant.  

Including an intemperate NH Supreme Court, who now only orders judges to break laws, even to the point of causing permanent brain injuries.  Even the NH Bar Association has stated that practicing NH law is attempting to practice only daily "traps for the unwary."  

How far will  a tax free state go?

FACT: STRONG STABLE MENTALITY IN NH - For over three and a half decades, NH government chose to kidnap mentally ill hospital patients and transfer them to a jail cell inside the NH men's state penitentiary against their will.  For 23 hours a day, instead of constructing a proper legal secured medical facility or simply just add on a proper secured wing to a hospital.

Treatments were not properly overseen, and medications were not administered only as required, without overdosing the patient to the point of death.  Now NH could of built a brand new proper secured medical wing on each hospital or better yet, an entire new secured medical facility for that matter, just on what the state has now paid out in mental healthcare lawsuits alone.

FACT:
GOOD HEALTHCARE AND 


WITH SUSTAINABLE WATER IN NH -

"Water Sustainability in NH"


 Reported By Citizens Count Editor:



"New Hampshire has a vast network of waterways, with 18 miles of coastline, nearly 1,000 lakes, and 17,000 miles of rivers. But with the population increasing and the integrity of our water system's infrastructure declining, the availability and sustainability of our state's water is at risk.

Aside from needing a potable water source for our daily lives, New Hampshire relies on quality water to sustain agriculture, wildlife, industries, and recreation. A balanced approach to water sustainability should protect the environment and public interest while at the same time managing property values, water fees, and our natural water supply.

Poor infrastructure
An aging system for water distribution means leakage of pipes, disruptions in availability, and potentially unsanitary conditions. According to a 2012 report from the New Hampshire Local Government Center,  many New Hampshire towns and cities still have water infrastructure dating to the 1800s.

With the state acquiring new water users every day, and each user requiring upwards of 75 gallons per day, the system is also overloaded.

However, updating water infrastructure is expensive.  When she declared "Drinking Water Week" in May 2013, even then-Gov. Maggie Hassan noted that drinking water and wastewater infrastructure needs roughly $3 billion in repairs and upgrades over the next decade."  Here we are 6 years into it and nothing is done other than a growing increase in cancer still without a cause as to why. Waiting for NH to correct anything in the state, has now become nothing more than a slow painful sentence to death.

FACT: GOOD HEALTHCARE IN NH - Now in 2019, both business and private drinking water wells have been drying up for the past eleven years while $23 million from the Environmental Protection Agency to upgrade sewage plants and drinking water systems in 2015, was only used to play "tricks" with to embezzle from Peter to pay Paul, by the NH Government alone.  The amount of government aid embezzled by the state government in NH now should anger America's taxpayers, let alone NH's, and rightfully so.

FACT: GOOD HEALTHCARE IN NH - Through no fault of their own, other than now trusting the word of the NH government, "On March 6, 2018 responding to a multi-state lawsuit, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia handed down a ruling siding with the hospitals, ONCE AGAIN!  The decision voided the CMS formula nationwide, putting New Hampshire back on the hook.   Now, the state’s hospitals were pushing for the full sum they say is owed – about $237 million – $71 million more than had been budgeted, according to Senate President Chuck Morse, R-Salem. 

John Formella, legal counsel for the governor’s office, confirmed that the upper limit that could be owed by the state amounts to “approximately $36-37 million per year in fiscal years 2018 and 2019.”   And in an April 10, 2018 letter to the hospitals provided to the Monitor, Deputy Attorney General Ann Rice acknowledged that the March 6 decision created new obligations,"  according to the article in the Concord Monitor.  All because once again, because NH state budgets are only designed to illegally rob Peter just to pay Paul.  This is what's been happening.


FACT: First and foremost, let's clearly clarify that this never was a "new obligation" because NH government was and still is continually well aware of this never ending required obligation.  But clearly only chose to be belligerent because the state already knew it still was in the red, even after having "close to $900 million in budget cuts" from almost a decade ago. 

10 hospitals now still struggle daily at times to thoroughly handle all the state's requirements and needs.  Largely caused by the NH government continually reneging on promises made while fully well knowing that they were impossible to keep for the past 7 decades.  Given the amount of grants the state has embezzled now from American's so far, would anger any average American taxpayer, let alone NH taxpayers themselves.

The states governor confessed that it either was previous administrations in the past, or possibly just his own, or both - again, that wasn't made very clear - who took taxpayer's money and government grants, that were only meant to go towards a specific crisis, but instead was being used to only play "tricks" with; that even required taking from NH's "unpredictable surplus revenues" now, for the state's already growing and continuous "unpredictable previous budgets."  That now continually has been made incapable to balance an already ridiculous "unsustainable government spending" that's already impossible year after year. 

Unfortunately many granite staters feel deceived and also see this as a premeditated crime called embezzlement, that is only methodically performed with precautions that conceal the criminal conversion of their property or funds, which only occurs without their knowledge or their consent.  This is what even the president of the united states has now even been investigated for. 


So if "The state's preliminary surplus statement (really?) is
a testament to the strong management by our (His) team," as claimed by Gov. Sanunu, then how is that so many studies completed so far, have now reported NH still having anywhere between a negative -5.7 percent to a negative -6.8 percent budget right now that is still incapable of maintaining the state's financial demands.  If and/or when a moderate recession were to even occur in the economy right now.  Basically NH already became the nuclear bomb and the timer had begun ticking decades ago and no one can stop it.

Yes, I do suffer from a brain injury from having a blood clot removed from the left side of my brain, no thanks to the one and only NH intemperate judicial branch of government who ordered it.  But that doesn't mean I am brain dead, as some NH politicians continually like to imply. So I am very capable of reading, and comprehending what I read in the moment.  I struggle with memory to finding the right words to speak and to properly write grammar as I am sure you've already seen.  But yet I am still being informed by many that they too see what is happening to our tiny state in the same way.  So, if a brain injury can now see this, then the trillion dollar question for the past century still remains, what the hell excuse does the government of NH truly have?  Other than a gambling problem with rolling the dice on peoples lives everyday now.


 NH's economy might be improving but it is nowhere near "Booming", let alone close to even becoming "nourishing again."  Some analysts have even predicted that the U.S. could be in a recession by the middle of next year.  So sorry governor, but NH has been anything BUT, "never been better,"  as you proudly advertised last year.  

FACT: AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN NH - In 2018, Elyssa Margolin of Housing Action NH, had made it very clear to the state that NH needs so much more funding to actually be capable to increase a decent supply of affordable housing that's been desperately demanded for years.

"According to Margolin now, Vermont has bonded $35 million in addition to another $10 million a year later.  Maine bonded $50 million in 2010, and every year had committed between $6 million and $12 million to affordable housing.  And Massachusetts bonded 1 billion over 5 years.  New Hampshire came in with the chamber of commerce and asked for $25 million," and once again, was only handing shiny new pennies for wishing wells instead. now that total only a whopping $2.5 million.  Once again, only because the state was already still embezzling from Peter to pay Paul.

FACT: STRONG STABLE MENTALITY IN NH - NH legalized adultery on January 1, 2015 only to suddenly find out just 7 months later, that OOPS! there were already 60,000 Granite Staters using the Ashley Madison, "Life Is Short, Have An Affair" Website.   Even NH officials were using their own government website address to sign into the website themselves.  Their member Id's were now purposely leaked out in the July 2015 debacle.  The irony in NH for many is that Adultery actually still remains legal even to this day, while NH's illiterate intemperate judges are now still claiming on record that, "there is no evidence of adultery here."

FACT: STRONG STABLE MENTALITY IN NH - In 2018, NH legislators refused to raise the legal age to marry to now even to the age of 18 from 13, but were willing to agree to only raise it just to 16 years of age that was now signed into law by Governor Sanunu himself. 

FACT: GOOD HEALTH IN NH" In 2018, NH built two more state liquor stores that now make a total of 81 stores sitting on a land mass that's only just less than 10,000 square miles.  This doesn't even begin to even count licensed alcohol retailers like grocery stores and restaurants in a state with an alcohol consumption that already almost is three times that of an entire country.  

Gov. Sanunu even signed a bill into law last year to lower the legal drinking age from 21 to 20.  The same year that NH builds the largest State liquor store in New England.  I truly am curious right now as to how many liver diseases and even required transplant patient's their are now in NH.  That exist just throughout the state alone.

FACT: Because of this, surrounding New England states, have been concerned and are now dealing not only with finding illegal bootleggers continuing to attempt to avoid taxes, but now an increase in the number of under age drinkers that will be legally crossing the border into NH and then illegally driving back into their home states with an alcohol content in their systems. This becomes a greater concern for many parents now.  who chose not to live and raise their children in a giant alcoholic drug infested den to begin with. That NH's government only could knowingly designed it for itself.

"One way that the state has sought to ease its conscience is the Alcohol Fund, which was established in 2000 to redirect a small percentage of alcohol profits to education, treatment and recovery programs," according to an article by the Concord Monitor.

The fund was originally supposed to receive 5 percent of the profits, but it has been funded only once at that level. Last year just 1.7 percent, about $3.3 million, went into the fund. That’s $6.6 million for the biennium when it should have been close to $20 million," The Monitor said. Once again, because NH state was to busy embezzling from Peter just to Pay Paul. 


It is one thing to endanger the children residing now within your own state but many parents feel that it is a whole new ballgame when a different neighboring state is now endangering their own.  A small number of New Englanders have begun looking into a class action suit now against NH.  NH's own law enforcement were very vocal against lowering the drinking age.  But as always NH government still chooses to remain ignorant like all the judges they have place so far, behind NH's courtroom benches.

FACT: It is truly ironic because NH government had placed all the blame for many years on other states for their high drug trafficking routes now going through the state, now causing it to remain among the top five states with the highest rate of drug use, and opioid-involved deaths.

It is now at the age-adjusted rate of 34.0 deaths per 100,000 persons. This was more than twice the average national rate of 14.6 deaths per 100,000 persons in 2017.  In a population of just less than 1.4 million living on a land mass less than just 10,000 square miles.  Multiple epidemics have been brewing for years in NH, while the state continually replaces band aides after band aides but just continues never to heal, year after year, while the state's government sits and watches while only continuously telling everyone how they can't afford it..

FACT:  "A CDC study analyzing 2013 NAS data available across 28 states estimated the national average NAS rate at 0.6 percent of live births (CDC, MMWR, 2014). NAS in New Hampshire increased dramatically from 2003 through 2011—from 20 cases in 2003 to nearly 150 in 2011 (NH DHHS). By 2015 this number rose to 269 infants (a rate of 24.4 of 1,000 live births) diagnosed with NAS (K. Smith, Carsey Research Regional Brief #51, University of NH)" 

FACT: Kyle Tasker - even a former republican state house representative now pleaded guilty to nine felonies, including four counts of using a computer to lure a minor for sex and five counts of possession of a controlled drug with intent to distribute, in Rockingham County Superior Court.

According to the September 9, 2016 report that was specifically titled.

"Attorney General Report on Kyle Tasker's drug distribution at the state house"

According to one NH state rep, "from the six large “kettles” of loose marijuana and drug-related paraphernalia in Tasker’s kitchen, and brownies and other drug supplies in his refrigerator, that Tasker was a full-fledged dealer who was operating something akin to “a dispensary.” he later learned that Tasker also sold illegal mushrooms and “molly,” which he denied using, buying, or being interested in. He was aware, however, that Tasker himself used these drugs.

According to this rep, Tasker was like the “Club Med of weed”: he had a variety of high-end strains of marijuana and charged accordingly. The representative paid about $400 for an ounce of marijuana, buying one or, at most, two ounces at a time. He also paid about $380 for two dozen brownies. Tasker would allow him to pay when he could, which resulted in him sometimes owing him several hundred dollars. He denied ever buying in bulk (though he admitted asking Tasker about bulk costs) and denied ever reselling the marijuana he purchased."


But yet the report also still claimed that, "None of the state representatives interviewed knew much, if anything, about Tasker’s illicit drug business or his other customers. None knew Tasker’s source. None said they purchased any drug or drug product from Tasker but marijuana, and all seemed to believe that Tasker was trying to help people who needed marijuana for medicinal purposes but could not obtain it legally in New Hampshire."

On March 7, 2019, Jason Schrieber, a Union Leader Correspondent reported - A judge on Thursday granted work release for former Nottingham state representative Kyle Tasker, who is expected to be paroled at the end of May after serving more than two years behind bars for drug possession and attempting to lure a 14-year-old girl for a sexual encounter.

Tasker, 33, appeared in Rockingham County Superior Court after the state prison recommended him for work release despite objections from the victim and Assistant County Attorney Stephanie Johnson.

While the victim had voiced concerns to prosecutors about Tasker getting out of prison early and being placed on work release, Judge Andrew Schulman said he felt strongly that the best way for someone to transition from prison to parole was through the work-release program.

Schulman, (another intemperate) judge said he hopes (Therefore is uncertain himself) Tasker will become a “productive and healthy member of society.”

Tasker was arrested in March 2016 during an undercover police operation and resigned from the House, where he was serving his third term as a state representative.

He was also the focus of an investigation by the Attorney General’s office, which found that he had used marijuana in the State House and sold it to a handful of state legislators, occasionally bringing the drug with him to Concord and distributing it there.

However, the AG report also stated, "the investigation did not “uncover pervasive illicit drug transactions at the State House or among, elected state officials.”


Tasker was sentenced to 3 to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty in May 2017 to five counts of possession of a controlled drug with intent to distribute and four counts of prohibited use of a computer.

He was given 158 days of pre-trial confinement credit and 2 years in prison, the later had six months of his minimum sentence suspended for completing sex-offender treatment.

GOOD HEALTH IN NH -

FACT: HIV Prevalence and HIV Diagnoses Attributed to Injection Drug Use (IDU)

    U.S. Incidence In 2016, 9 percent (3,480) of the 39,589 new diagnoses of HIV in the United States were attributed to IDU. Among new cases, 6.3 percent (2,530) were transmitted via IDU or male-to-male contact and IDU among men, and 2.3 percent (950) were transmitted via IDU among women.

    U.S. Prevalence: In 2016, 991,447 Americans were living with a diagnosed HIV infection—a rate of 306.6 cases per 100,000 persons. Among males, 19.9 percent (150,4661) contracted HIV from IDU or male-to-male contact and IDU while 21 percent (50,154) of females were living with HIV attributed to IDU.

    State Incidence: Of the new HIV cases in 2016, 42 occurred in New Hampshire. Data on HIV transmission for incident cases is unavailable for the state of New Hampshire due to the fact there is no funding left to do the research.
      State Prevalence: In 2015, an estimated 1,236 persons were living with a diagnosed HIV infection in New Hampshire—a rate of 107 cases per 100,000 persons. Data on the route of HIV transmission for prevalent cases is unavailable for the state of New Hampshire due to the state lacking a budget for it or They are now just refusing to say.  NH has yet to be a transparent state

         FACT: Hepatitis C (HCV) Prevalence and HCV Diagnoses Attributed to Injection Drug Use

          U.S. Incidence: In 2016, there were an estimated 41,200 new cases of acute HCV.. Among case reports that contain information about IDU, 68.6 percent indicated use of injection drugs.
            U.S. Prevalence: An estimated 2.4 million Americans are living with HCV based on 2013-2016 annual averages.
              State IncidenceOnce again, because the state cannot financially budget the necessary research required for this data, it is unavailable for the state of New Hampshire.

              State Prevalence: In New Hampshire, there are an estimated 23,300 persons living with Hepatitis C (2013-2016 annual average), a rate of 1,030 cases per 100,000 persons.

              FACT: Breast cancer in NH. Once again exceeds the national average. The incident rate just between 2011-2015 alone, was an average annual rate of 487.9 per 100,000.  However, NH is incapable of budgeting research to finally conclude why.  However Governor Sanunu did claim in 2018, that the state will now once again begin research for a second time, only this time on why NH still continues to have the highest rate of pediatric cancer in the country.  And claims they will not stop the research until they have answers this time.  Who the money is being embezzled from this time to pay for it, no one knows.

              T o prove my point, NH was the only state that couldn't even give the proper treatment for an out brake of Gonorrhea correctly in 2016.  So can you truly really say you can trust raising your children here?

              Even A New York Times article just recently this week stated,

              "State Senator John Reagan, a Republican who favors repeal, said he had long believed that the government’s primary role was to keep people safe, and that the death penalty was part of that."

              The senator's views however have changed now, mostly due  to one very important fact, 

              the more and more experience I had with government, I concluded that the general incompetency of government didn’t make them the right people to decide life and death”, he said.

              Well, there's one thing for sure, and that is that, "The general incompetency of NH government" has clearly proven they are not the right, nor even capable people, to be making decisions at all.  Many have already begun to make their decision, to get the hell out of dodge instead of waiting around just to see the NH government's big finale. No one wants to live inside a nuclear bomb when the timer was already turned on several decades ago.

              So To Governor Sanunu,

              Since NH is so "NUORISHING AND BOOMING AGAIN", to the point that the state "HAS NEVER BEEN BETTER."  2020 NH is now expecting to finally see first, some serious housekeeping. First and foremost, close all the booze and drug bars opened during the day at the state house and in judges chambers.  

              Second, to now see hospitals finally capable of handling all of the states requirements and needs with regular necessary research being done for useful statistical education that will keep on top of concerning issues. 

              Also, please don't forget the now well overdue $3 billion poor water infrastructure that's been on hold for the past 100 years.  That hopefully doesn't take another 20 to complete, since it was suppose to be completed within just 4 years from now. Along with the 35 year long way overdue brand new state of the art secured medical facility that should be finally breaking ground with new  construction.

              We can all happily assume, affordable housing finally will now see at least $50 million that has been required for well over a decade, with an additional ten million each year, instead of  the pennies distributed for wishing wells that apparently have only already gone dry.  While schools now finally can be immediately reimbursed for the unconstitutional school budgets that remained illegally enforced for the past forty years. 

              And last but never will it ever be the least - for god's sake and ours - We can finally get a judicial branch of government that actually didn't get an education in law out of a gumball machine that is now even ordering brain injuries. 

              This of course will now all be required without any further embezzlement from Peter to pay Paul, for at least another 200 years by government. 

              So, we would like to take this time and thank you for your extreme expedience in these matters. It is greatly appreciated to finally see the enrichment process finally begin in one NH state, from a century of embezzlements that only New Hampshire's government has now finally completed.

              Yours truly,
              NH taxpayers

              P.S. And now even more grateful is the entire United State of America.








              Apr 11, 2019

              THE DEATH PENALTY IN NH

              The New York times reported today:

              CONCORD, N.H. — Soon after the man who killed his father with a shotgun blast to the chest was captured, Renny Cushing ran into a friend at the grocery store, who said that he hoped the culprit would be executed so that Mr. Cushing’s family could find some peace.

              “I didn’t know how to respond,” recalled Mr. Cushing, who is now a New Hampshire state representative. “I knew he was trying to give me some comfort.”

              Mr. Cushing, a Democrat, was then — and is today — a death penalty opponent. And in the 31 years since his father’s murder, he has become one of the nation’s leading opponents of capital punishment. But his efforts at repeal in his home state have always fallen short.

              That may soon change:
              "The New Hampshire State Senate is expected to vote on Thursday morning to repeal the death penalty, after a 279-88 vote for repeal in the State House last month.

              Twice before — in 2000, and again last year — both chambers have voted for repeal, only to be blocked by a governor’s veto.

              This time, backers of repeal are hopeful that 16 of New Hampshire’s 24 senators will vote their way. That would give the measure the two-thirds majority needed to override another anticipated veto by the governor, Chris Sununu, a Republican who is a capital punishment proponent.

              If that were to happen, New Hampshire would become the last state in New England to get rid of the death penalty."

              Another issue that should strongly affect the vote is the multitude of errors that are being already made with many NH laws that are now independently being only illegally redefined by each judges' personal individual definitions of law, now throughout NH's entire Judicial branch of government.  They are clueless to what each other are doing.  

              Even the NH Bar Association has stated that practicing law in the state of New Hampshire, is like trying to practice to evade new daily "traps for the unwary " in a court of law, being made up now only by many intemperate NH state judges.

              The New York Times article further stated that, "State Senator John Reagan, a Republican who favors repeal, said he had long believed that the government’s primary role was to keep people safe, and that the death penalty was part of that.

              His views changed, though, because the more and more experience I had with government, I concluded that the general incompetency of government didn’t make them the right people to decide life and death.

              But it is Mr. Sununu who remains the principal opponent to abolishing the death penalty, and who, according to supporters of repeal, has continued to urge Republican colleagues to reject the legislation.

              But Mr. Renny Cushing said Mr. Sununu had avoided meeting with the relatives of victims who see the issue the same way Mr. Cushing does.

              GOD FORBID A NH STATE GOVERNOR WERE TO ACTUALLY NOW LISTEN TO HIS  TAXPAYERS AND ACTUAL CUSTITUENTS.

              “The governor has positioned himself as saying he’s vetoing the repeal of the death penalty because he cares about law enforcement and victims, but he’s refused to meet with murder victims’ family members who oppose the death penalty,” Mr. Cushing said.

              What’s more, the state does not actually even have an execution chamber at this point. (State law authorizes lethal injection as the means of execution, with hanging as a backup option.) 

              Lately, NH government has yet to bring an idea to full fruition to see it's completion since it has been a state that only settles for doing things only halfway or just simplify it by doing nothing at all. 

              Like simply substituting the NH men's state prison for over thirty years as secured medical facility, only without any proper medical treatment available. Other than the guards, (not nurses and/or doctors) using a tazor or simply overdosing hospital patients as the only  prescribed order of treatment.

              Hospital patients, that were only illegally kidnapped from an actual hospital room and placed in a jail cell now for 23 hours a day against their will.  They were being overly medicated just to shut them up, and for some  sadly only ended to the point of permanent death. 

              The debate has evoked powerful emotions on both sides. State Representative David Welch, a Republican, said he changed his mind to favor repeal after his wife died two years ago, causing profound grief and prompting him to be baptized.  According to the New York Times article.

              “The victim’s family goes through grief similar to what I went through,” Mr. Welch said in a recent speech. But “when that inmate is put to death, there’s another family going through the grief, and they’re innocent.”







              Apr 4, 2019

              NEW HAMPSHIRE IS IN SERIOUS NEED FOR DRASTIC CHANGES IN GOVERNMENT

              For the past two centuries now, a larger growing number of Graite Staters are beginning to question whether they should be given the choice to vote WHO their NH judges will be and Who gets to sit on the State Supreme Court, since they pay all judges salaries.  A NH judge may very well one day personally be making the very decision that could and would affect the rest of you and/or your children's lives one day, sooner than you may think. 

              The same freedom of democracy is not given to voters for NH judicial choices the same as for State Representatives, Senators, and a state Governor, or even the president of the United States.  Immediate change is seriously needed in a forever growing, very poor track record, state of New Hampshire judicial branches selection of judges.  So far they have only been continually proving one fact, that it is definitely time for change.

              States have debated for centuries how to create a fair and impartial judicial branch but NH has clearly never establish one  as of yet.  Selecting an optimal literate in law judicial selection method has apparently proven to be a highly unique challenging experience for NH.  Simply for one main reason, the judicial branch is expected to impartially apply laws without regard for politics or other considerations. 

              By giving independence with immunity to all laws,  is not a way to instill responsibility for the quality of their decision-making, therefore never would hold them accountable as the NH Judicial Conduct (-less) Committee has very clearly proven. 


              However, the NH judicial branch of government's history with the state's own records that have proven alone, very clearly through case file after case file, that this system is not working even without any help from a lacking NH JCC, never mind an entire dishonest NH government itself. This is a serious abuse of power.


              A  conduct-less government is the main cause for the state continually renegging on everything at one point or another.  The states governor clearly confessed that either previous administrations in the past or possibly just his own, - it wasn't made very clear - was taking taxpayer's money and government grants, that were meant to go towards a specific need, but instead was being used to play "tricks" with; that even required taking from NH's "unpredictable surplus revenues"for the state's already continuous "unpredictable previous budgets."  Now, continually making any attempts to balance an already continuous "unsustainable government spending;"  year after year. 

              You can also look at it as a premeditated crime that is, performed methodically with precautions that conceal the criminal conversion of the property or funds, which only occurs without the knowledge or the consent of the affected person or persons, That also is clearly defined as a well know crime called embezzlement.  You can take your pick because neither one is good.

              This is what is still causing "long-term operational obligations to become untenable"  in NH, still even today.  So if "The state's preliminary surplus statement is (really?) a testament to the strong management by our (His) team" as claimed by Gov. Sanunu, then how is it continually reported now in 2019, that NH only has anywhere between a negative -5.7 percent to a negative -6.8 percent budget, incapable to maintain the state's financial demands, if and/or when a moderate recession were to even occur in the economy now.  

              NH's economy might be improving but it is anywhere far from "Booming", let alone close to even becoming "nourishing again."  Some analysts have even predicted that the U.S. could be in a recession by the middle of next year.  Sorry governor, nice sell but still no cigar.  So if "The state's preliminary surplus statement is (truly) a testament to the (so-called) strong management by our (His) team",  as the present Governor recently reported, then NH is in serious trouble.  

              Proof: report by the Concord Monitor in 2018,

              "One way that the state has sought to ease its conscience is the Alcohol Fund, which was established in 2000 to redirect a small percentage of alcohol profits to education, treatment and recovery programs.

              The fund was originally supposed to receive 5 percent of the profits, but it has been funded only once at that level. Last year just 1.7 percent, about $3.3 million, went into the fund. That’s $6.6 million for the biennium when it should have been close to $20 million." 


              Also according to the Concord Monitor." 

              "We are not teetotalers, and we don’t believe the state should shutter all of its liquor and wine outlets. But we do believe that when New Hampshire can’t bring itself to give up even 5 percent of its record profits each year to address the negative impacts of the product it sponsors, it reveals shortsightedness that approaches malevolence."


              Other reports  in 2018:

              FACT: Elyssa Margolin of Housing Action NH, clearly clarified that the state needs extremely so much more to increase the supply of affordable housing.

              " According to Margolin, Vermont has bonded $35 million in addition to another $10 million a year later.  Maine bonded $50 million in 2010, and every year had committed between $6 million and $12 million to affordable housing.  And Massachusetts bonded 1 billion over 5 years.  New Hampshire cames in with the chamber of commerce and asked for $25 million, but were only fortunate enough to now embezzle a whopping $2.5 million"  from the budget. 

              This is simply reckless and very dangerous stupidity to use knowledgeable illegal "irresponsible practices", while knowing the outcome could only be poorer conditions and more suffering throughout the state now continually even today.  Whoever said NH state isn't a gambling state was clearly lying, proven only once again, by NH's own government track record itself. 

              NH government has inflicted this one tiny New England State, that only has a land mass less than just 10,000 square miles to begin with, to still struggle now from nearly $900 million in budget cuts, that the state has yet to be capable to recover from.   Recorded history is supporting everything but a growing healthy "booming" economy that the state's government and the governor himself is still attempting to sell you today.

              FACT: Because this "State sas always never fully funded its promises, by 1989, actually caused for Claremont's high school and Stevens High School to even lose its accreditation because the district could not keep up with needed repairs. The then chairman of the Claremont school board, Tom Connair, had  the parties reinstigate their lawsuit again, and three lawyers were then hired, Arpiar Saunders, John Garvey and Andru Volinsky."

              FACT: To give you another idea of how long NH government has been playing these "Tricks" with the state's budget now, it wasn't just one or two, or even just the past 3 NH state governors, but it was "the past four NH governors and their legislatures WHO refused to comply with multiple Court orders," that lead to even the Supreme Court to once again find the NH school funding system completely unconstitutional therefore illegal.  

              In September, 2006, Gov. lynch did try unsuccessfully though, to amend the state's illegal constitution. In 2018, Gov. Sanunu now claims this will finally come to an end, though NH has still yet to see any evidence of that.   

              Many states use partisan elections at some level of their judiciary selection.

              Supreme courts and intermediate appellate courts

              Eight states elect their supreme court justices in partisan elections. Altogether, 67 state high court justices (18 in Texas alone) are elected using this method.
              Two additional states have an electoral process that includes partisan and nonpartisan elements:
              • Michigan: Candidates for the supreme court are nominated at party conventions, but no partisan affiliation is listed by their name as it appears on the ballot. However, judges of the court of appeals and circuit courts are selected in nonpartisan elections.
              • Ohio: Candidates for the supreme court and courts of appeal are chosen in partisan primaries, but no party affiliation is listed by candidates' names on the general election ballot.

              Trial courts

              By state, more trial court judges participate in partisan elections than do appellate court judges. While only nine states hold partisan elections for appellate judges, 20 states use partisan elections to select their trial court judges.  It is time for change in New Hampshire's way of selecting all of NH judicial candidates.

              States with partisan elections for all trial courts

              Of those 20 states, seven states select judges through partisan elections at all trial court levels:
              Note: All judges in Ohio participate in partisan primaries and a nonpartisan general election.


              States with partisan probate court elections

              In these five states, the only judges who run for election are probate court judges:


              States with varied methods of selection for trial court judges

              The seven states below have varied methods of judicial selection but incorporate partisan elections at some level:
              • Arizona: In Arizona, only Justice Court judges are selected in partisan elections. Most other state judges are chosen through the assisted appointment method.
              • Indiana: In Indiana, all trial court judges are selected through partisan elections except for tax court judges, some circuit court judges and some superior court judges. For more information on Indiana, see Judicial selection in Indiana.
              • Kansas: Kansas has only one level of trial court, the district court. The method of selection is decided by voters of the judicial district; some judges are selected using the assisted appointment method, while others are chosen in partisan elections. For more on Kansas, see Judicial selection in Kansas.
              • Maryland: Judges of the orphans' court participate in partisan elections and circuit judges participate in partisan primaries, while most other judges are selected by assisted appointment.
              • Missouri: All judges of the circuit courts compete in partisan elections except those located in Clay, Greene, Jackson, Platte, and St. Louis counties and the city of St. Louis, who are chosen by assisted appointment.
              • New York: All trial court judges participate in partisan elections except those serving on the family courts.
              • Ohio: Judges participate in partisan primaries with nonpartisan general elections.
              Today, a Washington Post article reported that Judge William McLeod in Texas thought he’d had a pretty good first two months on the bench at Harris County Civil Court, he figured, he was now ready to take a run at the Texas Supreme Court.

              "But instead of preparing a bid for another, higher office, McLeod is now scrambling to hang onto the one he already has — his judgeship threatened by a clause in the state constitution.  McLeod had accidentally resigned.

              Shortly after he declared, in early March, roughly 60 days after taking office, a friend and fellow judge warned him that he may have inadvertently invoked Article 16, Section 65 of the constitution, which considers any declaration of candidacy for another office an automatic abdication of that official’s current position.

              The Washington Post also said, "McLeod, realizing his error, removed from his website the references to his Supreme Court run and retracted his announcement, saying he’d rather finish his four-year term as county judge.

              But the Harris County Attorney’s Office informed McLeod that there was no going back.
              “It’s our opinion that the facts as we understand them constitute an announcement of candidacy for another office,” Robert Soard, the first assistant county attorney, told The Post. “And that triggers the constitutional provision,” 

              The law is supposed to discourage officeholders from using their current positions as platforms to run for other offices, furthering their careers on the taxpayers’ dime, Soard said. He couldn’t remember another case of an official accidentally running afoul the provision.

              Some said cutting his tenure short would be like usurping the will of the people who elected him.
              “I can think of 647,502 reasons why Judge Bill McLeod needs to stay in that seat,” wrote Monica Roberts, author of the blog TransGriot, on Facebook. “That was the number of Harris County voters (including me) who wanted him on that bench for his full term of office.”

              However, some commenters were less willing to give McLeod a second chance. Responding to Roberts’ post, one said, “The good judge should know that ignorance of the law is never a defense especially one written into the state constitution.” Another asked, “Why is he above the law?
              McLeod says he understands that argument — he’s a law man himself — but he said he’s making a legal case that he should be allowed to stay.

              “I’m not asking for anything special, I’m just asking for the whole law to be considered,” he said, referring to the holdover provision."

              I'm 2018, NH Circuit Court Judge Paul Moore apparently also thought he had a good thing going when he tampered with his job reviews to attempt a seat on the State's Supreme Court. 

              Only after authorities became suspicious of Moore's perfect scores on his job evaluations, that are submitted supposedly by only the public and lawyers, Moore suddenly resigned.  His scores were way above all other judges.

               He now has joined a growing list of  multiple judges proving only to be just one more ignorant in law NH judge, with an unstable mentality that was previously proven to already only be ignorant in both country and state constitutions, never mind all laws.  The number of incapable NH judges being chosen today is now surpassing what simple statistics could ever imagine, let alone even conclude.

              Hasn't it surpassed the time for a change in New Hampshire's way of selecting all justices who are still making up their own laws and illegal rules in the NH judicial branch of government?  Starting with the  lazy NH Supreme Court, who repeatedly can't stop braking laws to actually participate in a 21st century democracy.  That apparently only the majority of the rest of the country is now only living in.

              To think it all began as far back as the 1800's with Judge John Pickering who served as chief justice of the New Hampshire Superior Court of Judicature.  As a judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire.  However, he only made history throughout the country by becoming the first federal officer to ever be impeached in the United States of America.

              On February 10, 1795, President George Washington nominated Pickering to preside on the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.  He was confirmed by the U.S. Senate and assumed the office two months later. After five years on the bench, Pickering began to show signs of cognitive decline. In 1801, Judge Jeremiah Smith was asked to fulfill Pickering’s duties.

              Pickering in the early 1800's had developed a reputation for “ravings, cursings, and crazed incoherences”  the same as many NH justices are still doing today. As part of his effort to remove Federalist judges from office, President Thomas Jefferson suggested that Pickering’s embarrassing conduct and alleged unlawful rulings amounted to an impeachable offense. Because Pickering refused to resign, Jefferson argued that impeachment was the only way to remove him from the bench.

              Pickering was charged with mental instability and intoxication on the bench and impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives on March 2, 1803.  NH judge John Pickering was then convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office on March 12, 1804.  The articles of impeachment stated, in part:
              That whereas for the due, faithful, and impartial administration of justice, temperance and sobriety are essential qualities in the character of a judge, yet the said John Pickering, being a man of loose morals and intemperate habits, on the 11th and 12th days of November, in the year 1802, being then judge of the district court in and for the district of New Hampshire, did appear on the bench of the said court for the administration of justice in a state of total intoxication, produced by the free and intemperate use of intoxicating liquors
              If Jefferson could only see the NH Judicial branch of government today, what would he have to say?  The NH government today, continues to still to this day, keep only intemperate NH judges. 

              Since NH has become well known for some time now, for simply being nothing more than a drug infested den that now has even reached the NH state house itself, along with the fact that the state's alcohol consumption outdrinks an entire country, without a single secured medical facility within the entire state, other than a jail cell in the men's state penitentiary for 23 hours a day, with no proper medical treatment to be found - Maybe it's well overdue time to have all NH government employees regularly tested for drugs and alcohol along with a psych evaluations multiple times throughout the year.  And the state should start with the judicial branch of government first.

              THE NEW HAMPSHIRE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT TODAY STILL RULES BY "LOOSE MORALES AND INTEMPERATE HABITS" 


              Since the NH Supreme Court required so much assistance from a Webster Meriam Dictionary just to define "sexual intercourse", here is  another word they might want to learn.


              in·tem·per·ate

              /inˈtemp(ə)rət/


              adjective: intemperate
              - showing a lack of self-control;
              "intemperate outbursts concerning global conspiracies"
              1. synonyms:
                Immoderate, excessive, undue, inordinate, unreasonable, unjustified, unwarranted, uncalled for;


                THE NH INTEMPERATE JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE
                A fundamental right to transparency by the NH Judicial Conduct Committee was suddenly stopped in 2009 without any reason as to why.  Granite State Taxpayers are furious to have the only activist fraudulent court in the country, who continually throws away our rights, the state's and country's constitutions, along with all laws, since the founding of NH in 1776.

                NH DISTRICT COURT INTEMPERATE JUDGE MICHEAL JONES
                FACT:  Jones was a part-time Special Justice investigated by the Judiciary Conduct Committee when police Chief Paul Donovan filed a grievance asking the committee to review 8 cases.

                After hearing a direct examination of the defendant's spouse and victim in a domestic assault giving testimony, Jones said that he, "was more like a marriage counselor than a judge."  Then after Jones had listened to the defendants testimony, who was a Caribbean man charged with marijuana possession, and worked on a catamaran sailboat, Jones' only response was, "The state doesn't get this, but this is all part of your culture, this stuff." the committee said that furthermore, Jones proceeded to then begin to tell a story of another case he presided over where the suspect is from Jamaica who was also charged with marijuana possession."

                Jones' conduct was also called into question when he accused prosecutor Grosky of undermining his authority when Grosky only simply asked to move forward with the trial.  Jones suddenly told Grosky to "Be quiet, be quiet, ok?  Hey, when you sit up here you can decide.  All right?"  Jones furthermore accused Grosky of even "stepping over the line" and threatened "One more time and I'm going to have these folks take you out of here."

                According to documents with the JCC, Jones also allowed a reputed member of the Hells Angels to be given a concealed handgun permit over chief Donovan's objections.  He overruled the chief's authority and within months later that member threatened a Londonderry couple driving along interstate 93 by pointing a handgun at them.  That member was then arrested and found guilty of reckless conduct and threatening behavior and served roughly 2 years in the state prison.



                NH CIRCUIT COURT INTEMPERATE JUDGE WILLIAM LYONS

                FACT: Lyons was suspended for 60 days without pay after an angry outburst towards a Deputy Sheriff.  The JCC found that Lyons lost his temper when the deputy refused to remove restraints from a suicidal 48 year old woman who became the focus of the emergency room Involuntary Commitment petition.


                Lyons suddenly just dismissed the case without it ever being heard, possibly causing potential harm to the woman who was already in danger of hurting herself.  Dismissing the petition was enormous, according to the JCC Referee, Paul Fauver, and according to a petition from a mental health worker handling the woman's case.  The commitment hearing was held May 31, 2013. 

                When Deputy Sheriff Matthew Poulicakos refused to remove the woman's wrist and leg restraints, he cited security reasons and department policy.  The JCC Referee Fauver determined that Lyons "continued his impatient, discourteous, demeaning behavior" towards Deputy Sheriff Poulicakos in the courtroom and also in his orders written days later.


                Lyons argued that the woman and her lawyer had no right to be heard, "because the hearing could not be conducted in a lawful manner given the refusal of the deputy to remove the restraints."


                The Supreme Court orders affirmed what the committee had found.  That Lyons violated the code of judicial conduct by not controlling his temper.



                NH CIRCUIT COURT INTEMPERATE JUDGE SHARON DEVRIES
                FACT: DeVries was reprimanded by the JCC based on the complaints made by the state police pertaining to her manner for which she presides over a series of criminal cases.  The case was initiated and brought to the committee by Kevin O'Brien, former Assistant Commissioner of the NH Dept. of Safety.  Complaints and Resolution were outlined in a 15 page decision, with a 25 page addendum attached by the JCC.

                12 cases were brought to the committee by the Dept. of Safety and were dismissed.  DeVries refused to accept plea deals negotiated by a state police prosecutor, describing them as a "Global Resolution" on Drugs.  The JCC found DeVries failed to make reasonable efforts to allow the prosecutor to be "fairly heard."

                In one case the JCC found DeVries made an "offense charging decision", for which "should be left to the prosecutor." 

                "Once the prosecutor objected to the reduction of the offense from a misdemeanor to a violation, the case should have been allowed to proceed to trial." According to the JCC

                In another case, she reported giving a defendant the benefit of the doubt because she knew a court clerk was under investigation for taking court fines that had later found to be totaling around $147,000 for personal use.

                In another case, she refused to order a defendant to obtain an interlock for driving while intoxicated conviction because it was not mandated.  The state police argued that the DWI was reduced from an aggravated DWI for which the device is mandatory for.




                Another case involved DeVries dismissing a domestic violence charge because the plea was made by state police prosecutor who sent a trooper to see it through.  In this case the JCC found that it was common practice to have police surrogates appear when cases are previously negotiated, and the victim was deprived of now having the defendant even attend an anger management program.



                Another case, DeVries was cautioned about hearing a case with someone without legal representation, who negotiated a plea deal for charges of Driving After Suspension and Marijuana Possesion.  DeVries denied the deal because she thought the fine was too high,  The state complained.



                DeVries was also reprimanded in 2009 for making an after hours call to a superior court judge to ask that a juvenile be held at a youth detention center, according to the reprimand order.  Because she became concerned for the juvenile, his family and community.

                NH Superior Criminal Court Intemperate Judge William Groff
                FACT: Judge Groff, is only another one of many NH judges like the entire NH Supreme Court, who only proves to be incapable of their duty pertaining to actually being knowledgeable in state legislative law. 

                FACT:"French kissing doesn't amount to sexual contact under New Hampshire law, according to Hillsborough County Superior Criminal Court Judge William Groff.  Judge Groff dismissed a felony sexual assault charge against a city teen-ager, finding that sexual assault laws don't cover kissing with the tongue.   The young man faced a charge of felonious sexual assault, involving a 6-year-old girl

                State law defines sexual contact as intentional touching of sexual or intimate parts.  The tongue, Judge Groff ruled, is neither sexual nor intimate.  He reasoned that the tongue is neither sexual nor intimate and wrote, "A tongue is not related to sexual relations, nor is it private. A tongue is displayed daily by the average person in speech and other conduct."


                "To accept the state's definition of tongue as an 'intimate part," Groff wrote, "would result in a person potentially committing a felonious sexual assault by touching a person's tongue with a finger."

                The judge further reasoned that French kissing (a 6 year old girl mind you!) can't be considered sexual contact under state law "even if done without consent and even if done for the purpose of sexual gratification."


                FACT: "In 1989, Groff also overturned a convictions of a Lowell, Mass., man, who was found guilty of sexually assaulting a young boy in Nashua because the boy used the word “bum” rather than “anus” in his testimony.  Because of the potential ambiguity of the word “bum,” Groff found that the boy’s testimony wasn’t enough to prove sexual penetration.  Months later, that same man plead guilty to sexual assault charges involving theat same boy, but only now it was in Massachusetts."



                FACT: In 1991, even the NH Supreme Court actually still upheld Judge Groff's decision to overturn this same conviction of this Lowell, Mass man, who was  already now found guilty of sexually assaulting a young boy in Nashua and again now in Massachusetts.  All because the boy used the word "bum" rather than "anus" in his testimony.  Groff found that the boy's testimony wasn't enough to prove sexual penetration and so did the NH Supreme Court, even after he was charged with the same crime once again with the same victim in massachusetts.   

                Massachusetts isn't the only state having to protect and save NH residents while cleaning up after NH's so called form of justice served.  There have been other states getting involved too.  And they are not too happy about spending their time and resources to clean up all the crime coming out of NH.



                FACT: "In fact, in 2012, it was a top GOP lawmaker who called for a special House committee to investigate potential wrongdoing within the NH Liquor Commission, including how it handles large cash purchases.

                "That committee's final report included two anecdotes of out-of-state residents arrested in Massachusetts with large hauls of New Hampshire-purchased booze. One of those arrests included 1,676 bottles of Hennessy, bought at multiple locations. The driver was charged with possessing untaxed liquor and unlawfully transporting liquor.


                Liquor enforcement officials in Vermont have made two arrests, one involving an estimated $40,000 worth of New Hampshire-purchased liquor in the back of an SUV, the other with an estimated $28,000 worth. Both suspects were charged with crossing state lines in possession of more than 9 liters of alcohol, Vermont's current legal limit."


                "The product that was the most prominent in both of these cases was Hennessy cognac," says Patrick Delaney, Vermont's commissioner of liquor control, who backs increasing the financial penalties for those caught illegally importing large quantities of liquor. He adds that "by using cash, there is obviously no paper trail, if an authority were to investigate it, The activity itself is basically tax evasion."


                “From our perspective, this is organized criminal activity,” says Gary Kessler, deputy commissioner at the Vermont Department of Liquor Control."



                "Along with New York, court records show Kessler’s agency has also sent investigators to stake out New Hampshire liquor store parking lots in recent months, including in Peterborough and Keene. When the customers crossed back into Vermont with trucks full of booze, they were arrested for violating that state’s liquor laws.

                “Clearly, these guys aren’t just randomly deciding that they are going to come up and buy some cases of alcohol,” Kessler says. “They are coming up here with shopping lists, these guys had a notebook, they have the money and the gift cards.”

                "These operations by other states are happening without the assistance or knowledge of New Hampshire officials. The New Hampshire Liquor Commission, which oversees 79 retail stores statewide, says it wasn't notified. Neither was the attorney general’s office or New Hampshire State Police."  The NH Attorney General's office finally got around to warranting an investigation 6 years later in 2018.

                NH CIRCUIT (Circus) COURT INTEMPERATE
                JUDGE PAMELA ALBEE

                The Only Zillow Ruling Judge In The Country!

                WE PRAY!!!!!!

                Only With A Spank On The Hand, Was She Placed Right Back Behind A NH Courtroom Bench  To Only Continue The Insanity. 


                So Where Exactly Is The Justice In That?

                FACT: Albee was investigated by the JCC only after the State Supreme Court issued their opinion finding "Irreversable Error" in the September 11, 2015 case involving Tammy Rokowski and Shane Rokowski. Albee entered and agreement to avoid facing formal disapline by the State Supreme Court.

                The agreement said she had multiple cases on the overdue orders list in 2013 and 2014.  The list is kept by administrators in order to make sure circuit court orders are completed within 30 days.  According to records Albee had anywhere between 7 - 21 delinquent cases every month.

                "Delays in rendering a judicial decision have negative consequences not only for the parties but for the overall administration of justice and must be avoided in the future."  The committee said.

                Albee was then also found to be using independent online sites like Zillow to research her decision-making in marital cases instead of using the actual evidence submitted that only actually applies to the case.



                The Judicial Conduct Committee
                made a finding that Albee violated Canon 2, Rule 2.9C of the Code of Judicial Conduct for using evidence outside of the record, but said this was not serious enough to warrant formal discipline by the Supreme Court. Instead, only with the consent of Albee first, “the Committee issues this Reprimand”, and immediately placed Albee back behind the bench to continue.



                "The committee urges that judge Albee refrain from concluding factual investigations outside the evidentiary record of the hearing or utilizing that information in her decision making process."  The committee said.



                "The committee determines that a clear violation of Canon 2, Rule 25A is not found but that the judge acted in a manner which requires attention and Judge Albee stipulates and consents to resolution of that code provision by it's dismissal with the issuance in the future."



                Timothy Rioux believes the conduct committee should have investigated all of Albee’s cases. He didn’t receive due process as a result of her actions, he said. The people whose cases were on the overdue orders list were cheated of their rights as well, Rioux said.



                “They didn’t get a timely hearing. I suggested that the JCC investigate further,” Rioux said.



                Rioux, an outspoken critic of the court system, said “These people need to be held accountable. There is no system of accountability for judges. The system protects them.”



                “The more digging you do, the more you realize it is corrupt at the core.” said Rioux



                Albee sustained serious injury from a fall in June of 2015 and had been on medical leave. She did not return to work fulltime, but did finally clear her overdue orders, the agreement said.

                The Head Of Circuit Court, Judge Edwin Kelly, had this to say.  "She served really ably in Carroll County and rarely was on the overdue list."



                First, 7 - 21 overdue cases per month is not considered as being rarely on the list and is considered a far cry from ably services in Carroll County.  Someone should know his employees better.





                THE INFAMOUS EX - NH CIRCUIT COURT INTEMPERATE JUDGE PAUL MOORE
                FACT: In October 2017, Moore was suddenly quietly place on paid leave of absence. Then in March 2018, the Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Conduct, finally came to a conclusion and filed formal charges against Moore stating, "The committee is persuaded that the probable exists to believe that Judge Moore abused the prestige of his judicial office to advance his personal or economic interests."  Seriously NOW only "PROBABLE EXISTS?"


                Only after authorities became suspicious of Moore's perfect scores on his job evaluations, that are submitted supposedly by only the public and lawyers, Moore suddenly resigned.  His scores were way above all other judges.


                In January 2018, Moore applied for disability benefits and claimed his health had been deteriorating for the past 15 months.  Yet nine months earlier he submitted his application to be considered for a supreme court appointment with no mention of poor health.


                (NOW THIS TRULY EXPLAINS AND EXPLAINS EXACTLY WHAT THE NH SUPREME COURT IS TRULY MADE UP OFF.)

                Moore was charged with 1 count of fraud "For making false statement'(s) in an attempt to defraud the NH Judicial Retirement Plan,"  and plead guilty to attempt to secure a disability pension.  He will not face any criminal charges as a result of fraudulent evaluations that were submitted. He also was only sentence to a suspended 12 month prison term.  He now walks free as a known felon!


                If Moore had succeeded he would of stolen over a million dollars in his lifetime from NH taxpayers hard earned paid tax dollars.


                NH SUPERIOR COURT INTEMPERATE JUDGE JOHN M. LEWIS SUDDENLY RETIRES DURING JCC INVESTIGATION

                FACT: While in a meeting with the county attorney's office and the public defenders office, Lewis made sexist remarks saying people are loosing respect for the legal profession because so many women are becoming lawyers.  It's hurting the teaching profession.  Another alleged comment made by Lewis was mentioned.  He allegedly said there is more respect in the business world because it is dominated by men.

                He was place on a paid administrative leave, then suddenly submitted his retirement letter within the following 2 weeks.  He was also accused of not being sympathetic enough to crime victims and allegedly had said that the aggressive product of child sexual assault may do more harm than good to the families and communities. 

                The Judiciary Conduct Committee said that Lewis at least gave the appearance of being bias against women therefore he violated the code of conduct.  Again, seriously? Only  "GAVE THE APPEARANCE", are you kidding?




                NH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE EDWARD FITZGERALD INVESTIGATED
                FACT: In 2007, Merrimack County Superior Court Judge Edward Fitzgerald had presided over a murder case.  He had been dating a courtroom employee named Corcoran, then they had stopped.  Corcoran then began dating the defendant's Attorney Ted Barnes.  The defendant was George Knickerbocker, a former NH man that was accused of killing a baby years ago who was now going to trial for a murder.  according to the JCC, there was no evidence proving this was the reason Knickerbocker received a lesser charge of manslaughter, and there was no reason this case nor any other case was affected by Judge Fitzgerald's conduct.





                The Entire NH Intemperate Supreme Court
                Who Should Be Investigated


                FACT: In 2010, NH State Supreme Court had written a much needed well overdue mandatory family court rule. It demands that all debts, property deeds, bank statements, retirement plan statements, investment statements, all life insurance statements and medical coverage policies, for a specific time period required for each, to all be submitted to the courts within 45 days of the filing.  BUT, only 'IF' it is even actually requested by the court first which is not being done. 



                FACT: This very same rule also very clearly but suddenly states. in case the court actually gets around to doing it's job and request any evidence that, "2.  The parties may redact all but the last four (4) digits of any account numbers and social security numbers that appear on any statements or documents."   Not only does this sentence defeat the purpose of the entire rule to begin with, but it most certainly breaks even more than just one NH state law, along with the United States Codes for the entire country.  Gee, how long did it actually take them to come up with this BS.  So clearly even the NH Supreme Court can't be bothered to actually review un-redacted evidence to follow the law, let alone be capable to enforce it.





                FACT: Title LXII - CRIMINAL CODE
                Chapter 641 - FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
                Section 641:7 - Tampering With Public Records or Information.


                Universal Citation: NH Rev Stat § 641:7 (2015)



                   
                641:7 Tampering With Public Records or Information. – A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if he:
                    I. Knowingly makes a false entry in or false alteration of any thing belonging to, received, or kept by the government for information or record, or required by law to be kept for information of the government; or
                    II. Presents or uses any thing knowing it to be false, and with a purpose that it be taken as a genuine part of information or records referred to in paragraph I; or
                    III. Purposely and unlawfully destroys, conceals, removes or otherwise impairs the verity or availability of any such thing.

                Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973.


                FACT 48: Title LXII - CRIMINAL CODE
                Chapter 638 - FRAUD
                Section 638:2 - Fraudulent Handling of Recordable Writings.


                Universal Citation: NH Rev Stat § 638:2 (2015)



                   
                638:2 Fraudulent Handling of Recordable Writings. – A person is guilty of a class B felony if, with a purpose to deceive or injure anyone, he falsifies, destroys, removes or conceals any will, deed, mortgage, security instrument or other writing for which the law provides public recording.

                Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973.


                FACT: 18 U.S.C. § 1505 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees








                After 243 years of NH's currupt illegal Justice system throughout the state, who was one of the original 13 colonies that actually signed the United States Declaration of Independence, and was the ninth state to ratify the United States Constitution, that actually brought that document into effect in June 1788, leaves only one unanswered question.  Why the hell isn't NH already a real law abiding state and government by now?

                ONLY IN NH FOLKS, ONLY IN NH!