UPDATED 10/17 + 19/2018
FACT 1:: As of 2018, NH state is in contempt of court with the United States Department of Justice for it's failure to comply with the 2012 agreement to invest $30 million in mental healthcare within the immediate following 2 years. We are now 5 1/2 years later and in more of a crisis than ever before in TAX FREE NH!
In 2012, The state agreed to spend an additional $6 million in the current budget, plus an additional $23.7 million in the next two-year spending plan. The resources will support more round-the-clock care for people in crisis, as well as more community housing and employment opportunities.
FACT 2: NH is also in contempt of court once again for, "Multiple NH Hospitals sued New Hampshire and settled. NH is facing a budget shortfall of up to $36 million following a federal district court decision over hospital payments, setting up a high-stakes scramble among state officials to negotiate a solution ahead of a May 31, 2018 payment deadline.
“They did not carry in the budget enough for the obligation,” said Scott O’Connell, an attorney representing a group of hospitals. “So somebody is going to be shorted.”
The issue stems back to the 2017 budget process. Last year, the Legislature set aside $166 million for the state’s uncompensated care fund in Fiscal Year 2018. That figure relied on a new payment formula from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) that allowed for lower payouts, even as hospitals warned the formula was improperly established and would be challenged in court.
"On March 6, responding to a multi-state lawsuit, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia handed down a ruling siding with the hospitals. The decision voided the CMS formula nationwide, putting New Hampshire back on the hook.
Now, the state’s hospitals are pushing for the full sum they say is owed – about $237 million – $71 million more than has been budgeted, according to Senate President Chuck Morse, R-Salem. Roughly half of that would come from state funds, with the rest paid through a federal match.
John Formella, legal counsel for the governor’s office, confirmed Friday that the upper limit that could be owed by the state amounts to “approximately $36-37 million per year in fiscal years 2018 and 2019.”
And in an April 10 letter to the hospitals provided to the Monitor, Deputy Attorney General Ann Rice acknowledged that the March 6 decision created new obligations.
“The state fully intends to follow the law in the amount of DSH payments that will be made by May 31, 2018,” Rice wrote to O’Connell, referring to the “disproportionate share hospital payments” owed by the state. May 31 is the federally-mandated payment deadline to hospitals under the Medicaid law."
FACT 3. Reported back in February 2015,
"This isn’t the first time lawsuits have put a crunch on the state budget.
A. The state was forced to spent $38 million in the current spending plan to build a new women’s prison after a class action lawsuit filed by female prisoners. Upon completion the total cost was $50 million.
B. Lawsuits over school funding stretched out for decades when towns said the state was shortchanging them on aid, costing the state millions after the ruling in the so-called Claremont suits of the 1990s.
If I can clearly research these problems with a brain injury that was only inflicted by the state of NH's government to begin with, then what the hell is NH's government's real excuse now going to be!?!?!?!?!?!
ILLEGAL ACTIONS FROM NH GOVERMENT
UPDATED MAY 27, 2018
UPDATED MAY 27, 2018
FACT 1:: As of 2018, NH state is in contempt of court with the United States Department of Justice for it's failure to comply with the 2012 agreement to invest $30 million in mental healthcare within the immediate following 2 years. We are now 5 1/2 years later and in more of a crisis than ever before in TAX FREE NH!
In 2012, The state agreed to spend an additional $6 million in the current budget, plus an additional $23.7 million in the next two-year spending plan. The resources will support more round-the-clock care for people in crisis, as well as more community housing and employment opportunities.
FACT 2: NH is also in contempt of court once again for, "Multiple NH Hospitals sued New Hampshire and settled. NH is facing a budget shortfall of up to $36 million following a federal district court decision over hospital payments, setting up a high-stakes scramble among state officials to negotiate a solution ahead of a May 31, 2018 payment deadline.
“They did not carry in the budget enough for the obligation,” said Scott O’Connell, an attorney representing a group of hospitals. “So somebody is going to be shorted.”
The issue stems back to the 2017 budget process. Last year, the Legislature set aside $166 million for the state’s uncompensated care fund in Fiscal Year 2018. That figure relied on a new payment formula from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) that allowed for lower payouts, even as hospitals warned the formula was improperly established and would be challenged in court.
"On March 6, responding to a multi-state lawsuit, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia handed down a ruling siding with the hospitals. The decision voided the CMS formula nationwide, putting New Hampshire back on the hook.
Now, the state’s hospitals are pushing for the full sum they say is owed – about $237 million – $71 million more than has been budgeted, according to Senate President Chuck Morse, R-Salem. Roughly half of that would come from state funds, with the rest paid through a federal match.
John Formella, legal counsel for the governor’s office, confirmed Friday that the upper limit that could be owed by the state amounts to “approximately $36-37 million per year in fiscal years 2018 and 2019.”
And in an April 10 letter to the hospitals provided to the Monitor, Deputy Attorney General Ann Rice acknowledged that the March 6 decision created new obligations.
“The state fully intends to follow the law in the amount of DSH payments that will be made by May 31, 2018,” Rice wrote to O’Connell, referring to the “disproportionate share hospital payments” owed by the state. May 31 is the federally-mandated payment deadline to hospitals under the Medicaid law."
FACT 3. Reported back in February 2015,
"This isn’t the first time lawsuits have put a crunch on the state budget.
A. The state was forced to spent $38 million in the current spending plan to build a new women’s prison after a class action lawsuit filed by female prisoners. Upon completion the total cost was $50 million.
B. Lawsuits over school funding stretched out for decades when towns said the state was shortchanging them on aid, costing the state millions after the ruling in the so-called Claremont suits of the 1990s.
Claremont School District v Governor of New Hampshire is an important legal case in New Hampshire. In the mid-1990s, the city of Claremont, New Hampshire started a process against the State of New Hampshire, challenging the constitutionality of the New Hampshire allocation of school funding.
The Claremont lawsuit was brought on behalf of five school districts that could not afford to properly fund their schools based on local property taxes. This was the second suit of this nature against the State of New Hampshire. The first suit was brought in the early 1980s and was settled when the State agreed to contribute 8% of the cost of education to a fund targeted to aid poor districts. The formula by which the money was distributed was designed by Professor John Augenblick and was called the Augenblick formula.
The State never fully funded its promise and by 1989 Claremont's high school, Stevens High School, had lost its accreditation because the district could not keep up with needed repairs. The then chairman of the Claremont school board, Tom Connair, caused the parties to reinstigate their lawsuit and three lawyers were hired, Arpiar Saunders, John Garvey and Andru Volinsky.
In 1993, the New Hampshire Supreme Court interpreted Part II, Article 83 of the New Hampshire Constitution to guarantee students a right to a public education. In 1997, the New Hampshire school funding system was found unconstitutional and the legislature and governor were ordered to define the components of a constitutionally adequate education, cost them out and pay for them with taxes that were equal across the state.
Four governors and their legislatures refused to comply with the Court's orders leading the Supreme Court to once again find the school funding system unconstitutional in September, 2006, leading Gov. John Lynch to try, unsuccessfully, to amend the state Constitution.
The Claremont petitioners have been represented since 1995 by John Tobin, Scott Johnson and Andru Volinsky, all of Concord, New Hampshire."
C. Dover school district v New Hampshire: In 2016, "a superior court judge has ruled that the state’s cap on adequacy grants to public schools is unconstitutional.
The lawsuit, brought by the city of Dover and its school district, means an extra $1.4 million for Dover, and a potential boost for nearly 40 other communities with caps on the amount of "adequacy funding" they receive.
The heart of the ruling goes back to the state Supreme Court’s rulings in the Claremont school funding case that began in the 1980s. The court ruled in part that the state has a constitutional duty to define an adequate public education and pay for it.
In fiscal years 2009 and 2010, state law directed the state Department of Education not to "distribute a total education grant on behalf of all pupils who reside in a municipality that exceeds that municipality’s total education grant for the 2009 fiscal year by 15 percent."
The cap did not affect Dover the first year, but it has ever since, for an estimated total of $14.2 million, according to the ruling.
"Curbing the amount of the grant deprives Dover of the full amount of what the legislature deemed necessary to sufficiently fund the opportunity for an adequate education in Dover," Tucker wrote. "When this occurs, the school district is left short of funds to pay the cost of an adequate education and either must make do with the amount of state aid allotted or make up the shortfall on its own. Either outcome violates Part II, Article 83, because the state ‘has the exclusive obligation to fund a constitutionally adequate education’ and ‘may not shift any of this constitutional responsibility to local communities’ ..."
Andru Volinsky, an attorney representing Dover, said the next step is to engage the state and legislative leaders to work out a payment agreement.
Gov. Maggie Hassan said she agreed with the attorney general’s position when the lawsuit was filed last year, that funding levels for certain school districts in 2016 "were not legally defensible."
"The Superior Court’s decision today reaffirms the validity of concerns raised by communities about school funding levels as well as the Attorney General’s original determination," Hassan said in a statement.
Hassan criticized the Legislature, saying, "I continue to call on the Legislature to meet our state’s obligation to pay these districts the money they are owed under the law, and my door is open to legislative leadership from both parties to discuss a way forward."
In a joint statement, Senate President Chuck Morse, R-Salem, and House Speaker Shawn Jasper, R-Hudson, said the Legislature is leading the way on education funding, including a plan to eliminate the (illegal) cap entirely in fiscal year 2018."
Don't hold your breath. Let's just wait and see, shall we?
D. In 2014, the state had a financial stake in 28 lawsuits, according to the state’s annual financial report. Of those, the state only lost one, won six and settled three. Eighteen are still undecided.
“This isn’t a problem of costs coming up unexpectedly, this is a problem of not being able to pay our bills when they come due and the Legislature seeing how long it can dodge the bill collector,” said Andru Volinsky, the lead attorney on the education funding lawsuits."
The Claremont lawsuit was brought on behalf of five school districts that could not afford to properly fund their schools based on local property taxes. This was the second suit of this nature against the State of New Hampshire. The first suit was brought in the early 1980s and was settled when the State agreed to contribute 8% of the cost of education to a fund targeted to aid poor districts. The formula by which the money was distributed was designed by Professor John Augenblick and was called the Augenblick formula.
The State never fully funded its promise and by 1989 Claremont's high school, Stevens High School, had lost its accreditation because the district could not keep up with needed repairs. The then chairman of the Claremont school board, Tom Connair, caused the parties to reinstigate their lawsuit and three lawyers were hired, Arpiar Saunders, John Garvey and Andru Volinsky.
In 1993, the New Hampshire Supreme Court interpreted Part II, Article 83 of the New Hampshire Constitution to guarantee students a right to a public education. In 1997, the New Hampshire school funding system was found unconstitutional and the legislature and governor were ordered to define the components of a constitutionally adequate education, cost them out and pay for them with taxes that were equal across the state.
Four governors and their legislatures refused to comply with the Court's orders leading the Supreme Court to once again find the school funding system unconstitutional in September, 2006, leading Gov. John Lynch to try, unsuccessfully, to amend the state Constitution.
The Claremont petitioners have been represented since 1995 by John Tobin, Scott Johnson and Andru Volinsky, all of Concord, New Hampshire."
C. Dover school district v New Hampshire: In 2016, "a superior court judge has ruled that the state’s cap on adequacy grants to public schools is unconstitutional.
The lawsuit, brought by the city of Dover and its school district, means an extra $1.4 million for Dover, and a potential boost for nearly 40 other communities with caps on the amount of "adequacy funding" they receive.
The heart of the ruling goes back to the state Supreme Court’s rulings in the Claremont school funding case that began in the 1980s. The court ruled in part that the state has a constitutional duty to define an adequate public education and pay for it.
In fiscal years 2009 and 2010, state law directed the state Department of Education not to "distribute a total education grant on behalf of all pupils who reside in a municipality that exceeds that municipality’s total education grant for the 2009 fiscal year by 15 percent."
The cap did not affect Dover the first year, but it has ever since, for an estimated total of $14.2 million, according to the ruling.
"Curbing the amount of the grant deprives Dover of the full amount of what the legislature deemed necessary to sufficiently fund the opportunity for an adequate education in Dover," Tucker wrote. "When this occurs, the school district is left short of funds to pay the cost of an adequate education and either must make do with the amount of state aid allotted or make up the shortfall on its own. Either outcome violates Part II, Article 83, because the state ‘has the exclusive obligation to fund a constitutionally adequate education’ and ‘may not shift any of this constitutional responsibility to local communities’ ..."
Andru Volinsky, an attorney representing Dover, said the next step is to engage the state and legislative leaders to work out a payment agreement.
Gov. Maggie Hassan said she agreed with the attorney general’s position when the lawsuit was filed last year, that funding levels for certain school districts in 2016 "were not legally defensible."
"The Superior Court’s decision today reaffirms the validity of concerns raised by communities about school funding levels as well as the Attorney General’s original determination," Hassan said in a statement.
Hassan criticized the Legislature, saying, "I continue to call on the Legislature to meet our state’s obligation to pay these districts the money they are owed under the law, and my door is open to legislative leadership from both parties to discuss a way forward."
In a joint statement, Senate President Chuck Morse, R-Salem, and House Speaker Shawn Jasper, R-Hudson, said the Legislature is leading the way on education funding, including a plan to eliminate the (illegal) cap entirely in fiscal year 2018."
Don't hold your breath. Let's just wait and see, shall we?
D. In 2014, the state had a financial stake in 28 lawsuits, according to the state’s annual financial report. Of those, the state only lost one, won six and settled three. Eighteen are still undecided.
“This isn’t a problem of costs coming up unexpectedly, this is a problem of not being able to pay our bills when they come due and the Legislature seeing how long it can dodge the bill collector,” said Andru Volinsky, the lead attorney on the education funding lawsuits."
If I can clearly research these problems with a brain injury that was only inflicted by the state of NH's government to begin with, then what the hell is NH's government's real excuse now going to be!?!?!?!?!?!
What Can One Only Say Other than It's NH
NH's Unstable Genius government has caused and made their own "Vietnam Wars" throughout the years, exactly the same as our so called "Stable Genius," President Donald Trump has done. This is what truly became family values in the state of New Hampshire for decades to come.
The evolution of the human species has definitely evolved but not at all for the better. Despite the fact that there has been a NH educational structure for well over 30 years teaching safe sex, instead of abstinence makes a body healthier and live longer, clearly has now proven to be less than adequate education for our children. Even to the point of actually now literally going in one ear and out the other.
As of 3 years ago, our little New England granite state among many, was historically recorded to have had close to 60,000 NH members, including several government officials, who were poetically listed on the "Ashley Madison - Life Is Short, Have An Affair," Website Breach. Which coincidentally was also suddenly publicly breached just several months after NH had recklessly just decriminalized adultery altogether on January 1, 2015. NH still remains adultery lawless to this day. Then again, this is NH, the state who must always live by their motto, "Live Free Or Die " trying to.
And here is why:
REALITY CHECK:
Congress has impeached and removed only seven judges in the history of the federal judiciary. And their very first one was only once again, from the state of New Hampshire, when John Pickering, a NH district judge was convicted in 1804. He was removed on charges of mental instability and for being a drunk on the bench, according to information from the Federal Judicial Center.
Now in 2018, NH Judge Paul Moore, another NH judge, commits fraudulent job reviews in attempts to attain over a million dollars in a retirement plan, while also attempting to attain a seat on the NH Supreme Court.
He now walked away a free man with a suspended jail sentence to enjoy a hefty retirement only paid from taxpayers hard earned paid tax dollars. Does anyone see any resemblance to what's really going on throughout this country? It is almost ten years ago that I joined many people who have already brought forth decades of evidence that is being ignored by NH government.
For the past 214 years the NH Judicial branch of government's own court records have continued to only conclude to support one fact. And that is that the majority of NH justices have only shown numerous counts of exercising abuse of power with mental instability, and it is all on record.
Along with a strong illiteracy in law, that only goes all the way up through the entire NH Supreme Court itself. This is what only continues to destroy thousands of lives and families on a daily basis. Now it has only produced generations of the "main cause" for thousands of NH mental illness sufferers with no solid mental healthcare structure in place to this day to help them survive what NH government is inflicting. And now with only many more to still come. There is and never will be any safe family unity, structure, or actual law, that will be legally and safely implemented or enforced by a NH state government.
2016 7.O 6.9 3.4 3.2
2015 6.9 6.9 3.3 3.1
2014 7.2 6.9 3.5 3.2
2013 6.9 6.8 3.7 3.3
2012 6.8 6.8 3.6 3.4
2011 7.1 6.8 3.8 3.6
2010 8.3 6.8 3.8 3.6
2009 6.5 6.8 3.7 3.5
2008 6.8 7.1 3.9 3.5
2007 7.1 7.3 3.8 3.6
2006 7.2 7.5 4.1 3.7
2005 7.3 7.6 3.9 3.6
2004 8.0 7.8 4.0 3.7
2003 8.1 7.1 4.1 3.8
2002 8.3 8.0 4.3 3.9
2001 8.5 8.2 4.4 4.0
2000 9.4 8.2 4.8 4.0
Going as far back as a century, having sexual intercourse with others, other than just your spouse or just a very significant other, is clearly only considered as no real cause to divorce, or even separate here in NH, according to it's government. To be even more specific, it has been illegally according to the entire NH judicial branch of government, going all the way up to the NH Supreme Court itself. That is only until the so-called impeccable proof of the claimed adultery committed, also now comes with impeccable proof that it is actually also now the unquestionable "main cause" to even divorce. Seriously? And even after all that, it even also has to also support all and any impeccable proof from any reasonable doubt it even occurred. Now enforcing the one and only fact that adultery only is clearly caused by the spouse who doesn't commit it according to NH justices!!!!! Gee, how long did it actually really take NH justices to make all that up? Well, apparently those long black robes have been in use for more ways than one in NH.
First, Let me begin by clearly thoroughly showing you what NH judges do with the evidence to begin with. At my Relief Hearing, my husband's attorney, Richard C Follender, came to court with nothing but an empty briefcase, a pad of paper, and a pen. He proudly told Superior Criminal Court Judge Groff that his client (my husband) is unable to pay any alimony, let alone even be capable to afford his own place to live, and therefore he is currently moving from house to house between family and friends, and now needs the homestead to be sold because of it.
When my attorney immediately asked Judge Groff, "Then where is she suppose to go? What is she suppose to do?" He did not answer her. Then she suddenly pointed to my husband and his attorney and firmly said, "Their lying!" Judge Groff then suddenly grew a backbone, and became agitated when he asked, "do you have any proof?" While confidently but very arrogantly already presuming the answer will just be NO. Given the fact that he already knew how thorough most Court Attorney''s evidence truly is. Only Just exactly like Follender's empty briefcase, when they come to court!
She then suddenly lifted up a private investigators report along with several of my husband's past year end pay stubs in her hand, that already supported his yearly income for the past several years. That also showed $25,000 to $30,000 more than what he claimed and submitted on his financial affidavit, which again was false. So her firm answer was, "yes, we have a private investigators report!" Judge Groff immediately but silently swallowed down hard and only quickly wrote a few notes in his notebook He then just ended the hearing while just saying he will make a decision. He then immediately stood up and walked out of the courtroom without taking any of the evidence in hand that he even requested to further review. We left with all the evidence that we still came with.
The damage was already done by the time my divorce even finalized in 2009. I ended up having a massive stroke a few years later from blood clots in both of my lungs and also in the right frontal lobe of my brain. I was then immediately flown from Southern NH Medical Center, Nashua NH, to Mass General Hospital in Massachusetts by helicopter for emergency brain surgery to only now hopefully remove a blood clot safely after being diagnosed. And it was not without further complications.
I ended up needing an additional 3 more emergency surgeries that also required 12 more additional blood transfusions and an entire month of transferring me by ambulance between 4 different hospitals and multiple surgeons between 2 different states, New Hampshire and Massachusetts. At only 50 years old, it took me months only just to partially rebuild my strength on my left side, and regain my ability to even have the ability to speak again, let alone walk on my own again, or be allowed any career again. This was purposely inflicted on me only by a disgruntle future ex spouse and all of NH's government, who was already well known for making repetative deadly mistakes!!!!!!!!!!.
Now, I am permanently disabled from intermitted short term memory loss, and forced to live on $937/ monthly disability for the rest of my life because of my government. I am only 1 of hundreds of thousands each year that are now forced unnecessarily mind you, into a position of now requiring payment to survive on NH taxpayers hard earned paid tax dollars. All caused from the very government, who purposely placed me and many others in this position in the first place. And it was all just so my husband could now support and marry his co-workers second hand used up, already twice divorced, sharing unemployed welfare fraud committing mistress, who had 4 children, already fathered by 3 different men.
A women who commits welfare fraud now with only multiple married men and even simultaneously at that. According to the NH Judiciary Conduct Committee, I had no case against Judge Groff when I called and reported what happened in a 15 minute hearing requesting temporary alimony. This is what true family values are and what real NH justice is and would be, for you and/or your children if need be! Do you really think your children are truly safe living in NH?
Judge Groff, is only one of many NH judges, especially the entire NH Supreme Court, who very much enjoys his abuse of power by making up many of their own insane personal but clearly illegal ideas just exactly like Judge Kavanough when it pertains to laws, family values, and even sex on a daily bases. 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. So just be extremely great-full that our medical professional standards are extremely much higher and not identical to NH's judicial standards.
"French kissing doesn't amount to sexual contact under New Hampshire law, according to Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge William Groff. Judge Groff dismissed a felony sexual assault charge against a city teen-ager, finding that sexual assault laws don't cover kissing with the tongue. The young man faced a charge of felonious sexual assault, involving a 6-year-old girl.
State law defines sexual contact as intentional touching of sexual or intimate parts. The tongue, Judge Groff ruled, is neither sexual nor intimate. He reasoned that the tongue is neither sexual nor intimate and wrote, "A tongue is not related to sexual relations, nor is it private. A tongue is displayed daily by the average person in speech and other conduct."
"To accept the state's definition of tongue as an 'intimate part," Groff wrote, "would result in a person potentially committing a felonious sexual assault by touching a person's tongue with a finger."
The judge further reasoned that French kissing (a 6 year old girl mind you!) can't be considered sexual contact under state law "even if done without consent and even if done for the purpose of sexual gratification."
As of 3 years ago, our little New England granite state among many, was historically recorded to have had close to 60,000 NH members, including several government officials, who were poetically listed on the "Ashley Madison - Life Is Short, Have An Affair," Website Breach. Which coincidentally was also suddenly publicly breached just several months after NH had recklessly just decriminalized adultery altogether on January 1, 2015. NH still remains adultery lawless to this day. Then again, this is NH, the state who must always live by their motto, "Live Free Or Die " trying to.
And here is why:
REALITY CHECK:
Congress has impeached and removed only seven judges in the history of the federal judiciary. And their very first one was only once again, from the state of New Hampshire, when John Pickering, a NH district judge was convicted in 1804. He was removed on charges of mental instability and for being a drunk on the bench, according to information from the Federal Judicial Center.
Now in 2018, NH Judge Paul Moore, another NH judge, commits fraudulent job reviews in attempts to attain over a million dollars in a retirement plan, while also attempting to attain a seat on the NH Supreme Court.
He now walked away a free man with a suspended jail sentence to enjoy a hefty retirement only paid from taxpayers hard earned paid tax dollars. Does anyone see any resemblance to what's really going on throughout this country? It is almost ten years ago that I joined many people who have already brought forth decades of evidence that is being ignored by NH government.
For the past 214 years the NH Judicial branch of government's own court records have continued to only conclude to support one fact. And that is that the majority of NH justices have only shown numerous counts of exercising abuse of power with mental instability, and it is all on record.
Along with a strong illiteracy in law, that only goes all the way up through the entire NH Supreme Court itself. This is what only continues to destroy thousands of lives and families on a daily basis. Now it has only produced generations of the "main cause" for thousands of NH mental illness sufferers with no solid mental healthcare structure in place to this day to help them survive what NH government is inflicting. And now with only many more to still come. There is and never will be any safe family unity, structure, or actual law, that will be legally and safely implemented or enforced by a NH state government.
FOR 17 YEARS - NH DIVORCE RATES HAVE BEEN HIGHER
THAN THE ENTIRE NATIONAL AVERAGE DIVORCE RATE
THAN THE ENTIRE NATIONAL AVERAGE DIVORCE RATE
NEW HAMPSHIRE'S RESPONSE: KEEP CUTTTING
THE NH JUDICIAL JUSTICE SYSTEM's BUDGET
NH STATE IS ONLY 190 MILES LONG AND ONLY 50 MILES WIDE. FOR NH TO BECOME A STATE CAPAPABLE OF DOING MORE DAMAGE THAN THE ENTIRE NATION ON ANY LEVEL IS UNFATHAMOBLE.
THE NH JUDICIAL JUSTICE SYSTEM's BUDGET
NH STATE IS ONLY 190 MILES LONG AND ONLY 50 MILES WIDE. FOR NH TO BECOME A STATE CAPAPABLE OF DOING MORE DAMAGE THAN THE ENTIRE NATION ON ANY LEVEL IS UNFATHAMOBLE.
Provisional number of marriage and divorce rate (2000-2016) CDC
New Hampshire v United States Marriage and Divorce Rates 2000-2016 [Rates are based on provisional counts of marriages by state of occurrence. Rates are per 1,000 total population residing in area. Population enumerated as of April 1 for 2000 and 2010, all other years are estimated as of July 1]
New Hampshire v United States Marriage and Divorce Rates 2000-2016 [Rates are based on provisional counts of marriages by state of occurrence. Rates are per 1,000 total population residing in area. Population enumerated as of April 1 for 2000 and 2010, all other years are estimated as of July 1]
YEAR NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES NH RATE OF U.S. RATE OF
MARRIAGES MARRIAGES DIVORCE DIVORCE2016 7.O 6.9 3.4 3.2
2015 6.9 6.9 3.3 3.1
2014 7.2 6.9 3.5 3.2
2013 6.9 6.8 3.7 3.3
2012 6.8 6.8 3.6 3.4
2011 7.1 6.8 3.8 3.6
2010 8.3 6.8 3.8 3.6
2009 6.5 6.8 3.7 3.5
2008 6.8 7.1 3.9 3.5
2007 7.1 7.3 3.8 3.6
2006 7.2 7.5 4.1 3.7
2005 7.3 7.6 3.9 3.6
2004 8.0 7.8 4.0 3.7
2003 8.1 7.1 4.1 3.8
2002 8.3 8.0 4.3 3.9
2001 8.5 8.2 4.4 4.0
2000 9.4 8.2 4.8 4.0
Going as far back as a century, having sexual intercourse with others, other than just your spouse or just a very significant other, is clearly only considered as no real cause to divorce, or even separate here in NH, according to it's government. To be even more specific, it has been illegally according to the entire NH judicial branch of government, going all the way up to the NH Supreme Court itself. That is only until the so-called impeccable proof of the claimed adultery committed, also now comes with impeccable proof that it is actually also now the unquestionable "main cause" to even divorce. Seriously? And even after all that, it even also has to also support all and any impeccable proof from any reasonable doubt it even occurred. Now enforcing the one and only fact that adultery only is clearly caused by the spouse who doesn't commit it according to NH justices!!!!! Gee, how long did it actually really take NH justices to make all that up? Well, apparently those long black robes have been in use for more ways than one in NH.
First, Let me begin by clearly thoroughly showing you what NH judges do with the evidence to begin with. At my Relief Hearing, my husband's attorney, Richard C Follender, came to court with nothing but an empty briefcase, a pad of paper, and a pen. He proudly told Superior Criminal Court Judge Groff that his client (my husband) is unable to pay any alimony, let alone even be capable to afford his own place to live, and therefore he is currently moving from house to house between family and friends, and now needs the homestead to be sold because of it.
When my attorney immediately asked Judge Groff, "Then where is she suppose to go? What is she suppose to do?" He did not answer her. Then she suddenly pointed to my husband and his attorney and firmly said, "Their lying!" Judge Groff then suddenly grew a backbone, and became agitated when he asked, "do you have any proof?" While confidently but very arrogantly already presuming the answer will just be NO. Given the fact that he already knew how thorough most Court Attorney''s evidence truly is. Only Just exactly like Follender's empty briefcase, when they come to court!
She then suddenly lifted up a private investigators report along with several of my husband's past year end pay stubs in her hand, that already supported his yearly income for the past several years. That also showed $25,000 to $30,000 more than what he claimed and submitted on his financial affidavit, which again was false. So her firm answer was, "yes, we have a private investigators report!" Judge Groff immediately but silently swallowed down hard and only quickly wrote a few notes in his notebook He then just ended the hearing while just saying he will make a decision. He then immediately stood up and walked out of the courtroom without taking any of the evidence in hand that he even requested to further review. We left with all the evidence that we still came with.
The damage was already done by the time my divorce even finalized in 2009. I ended up having a massive stroke a few years later from blood clots in both of my lungs and also in the right frontal lobe of my brain. I was then immediately flown from Southern NH Medical Center, Nashua NH, to Mass General Hospital in Massachusetts by helicopter for emergency brain surgery to only now hopefully remove a blood clot safely after being diagnosed. And it was not without further complications.
I ended up needing an additional 3 more emergency surgeries that also required 12 more additional blood transfusions and an entire month of transferring me by ambulance between 4 different hospitals and multiple surgeons between 2 different states, New Hampshire and Massachusetts. At only 50 years old, it took me months only just to partially rebuild my strength on my left side, and regain my ability to even have the ability to speak again, let alone walk on my own again, or be allowed any career again. This was purposely inflicted on me only by a disgruntle future ex spouse and all of NH's government, who was already well known for making repetative deadly mistakes!!!!!!!!!!.
Now, I am permanently disabled from intermitted short term memory loss, and forced to live on $937/ monthly disability for the rest of my life because of my government. I am only 1 of hundreds of thousands each year that are now forced unnecessarily mind you, into a position of now requiring payment to survive on NH taxpayers hard earned paid tax dollars. All caused from the very government, who purposely placed me and many others in this position in the first place. And it was all just so my husband could now support and marry his co-workers second hand used up, already twice divorced, sharing unemployed welfare fraud committing mistress, who had 4 children, already fathered by 3 different men.
A women who commits welfare fraud now with only multiple married men and even simultaneously at that. According to the NH Judiciary Conduct Committee, I had no case against Judge Groff when I called and reported what happened in a 15 minute hearing requesting temporary alimony. This is what true family values are and what real NH justice is and would be, for you and/or your children if need be! Do you really think your children are truly safe living in NH?
Judge Groff, is only one of many NH judges, especially the entire NH Supreme Court, who very much enjoys his abuse of power by making up many of their own insane personal but clearly illegal ideas just exactly like Judge Kavanough when it pertains to laws, family values, and even sex on a daily bases. 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. So just be extremely great-full that our medical professional standards are extremely much higher and not identical to NH's judicial standards.
"French kissing doesn't amount to sexual contact under New Hampshire law, according to Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge William Groff. Judge Groff dismissed a felony sexual assault charge against a city teen-ager, finding that sexual assault laws don't cover kissing with the tongue. The young man faced a charge of felonious sexual assault, involving a 6-year-old girl.
State law defines sexual contact as intentional touching of sexual or intimate parts. The tongue, Judge Groff ruled, is neither sexual nor intimate. He reasoned that the tongue is neither sexual nor intimate and wrote, "A tongue is not related to sexual relations, nor is it private. A tongue is displayed daily by the average person in speech and other conduct."
"To accept the state's definition of tongue as an 'intimate part," Groff wrote, "would result in a person potentially committing a felonious sexual assault by touching a person's tongue with a finger."
The judge further reasoned that French kissing (a 6 year old girl mind you!) can't be considered sexual contact under state law "even if done without consent and even if done for the purpose of sexual gratification."
"In 1989, Groff also overturned a convictions of a Lowell, Mass., man, who was found guilty of sexually assaulting a young boy in Nashua because the boy used the word “bum” rather than “anus” in his testimony. Because of the potential ambiguity of the word “bum,” Groff found that the boy’s testimony wasn’t enough to prove sexual penetration. Months later, this same man pleaded guilty to sexual assault charges involving the same boy, only now in the state of Massachusetts."
In 1 of many family court rules that the NH State Supreme Court has written, was in 2010, that was a much needed well overdue mandatory family court rule. It demands that all debts, property deeds, bank statements, retirement plan statements, investment statements, all life insurance statements and medical coverage policies, with a specific time period required for each, to all be submitted to the courts within 45 days of the filing. But then in this very same rule, it clearly then suddenly states, "2. The parties may redact all but the last four (4) digits of any account numbers and social security numbers that appear on any statements or documents." Are you kidding me??? Not only does this sentence defeat the purpose of the entire rule to begin with, but it most certainly breaks NH state law along with the United States Codes for the entire country. This is nothing more than lazy careless illegal justice in the state of NH.
Title LXII - CRIMINAL CODE
Chapter 641 - FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
Section 641:7 - Tampering With Public Records or Information.
641:7 Tampering With Public Records or Information. – A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if he:
I. Knowingly makes a false entry in or false alteration of any thing belonging to, received, or kept by the government for information or record, or required by law to be kept for information of the government; or
II. Presents or uses any thing knowing it to be false, and with a purpose that it be taken as a genuine part of information or records referred to in paragraph I; or
III. Purposely and unlawfully destroys, conceals, removes or otherwise impairs the verity or availability of any such thing.
Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973.
Title LXII - CRIMINAL CODE
Chapter 638 - FRAUD
Section 638:2 - Fraudulent Handling of Recordable Writings.
638:2 Fraudulent Handling of Recordable Writings. – A person is guilty of a class B felony if, with a purpose to deceive or injure anyone, he falsifies, destroys, removes or conceals any will, deed, mortgage, security instrument or other writing for which the law provides public recording.
Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973.
Massachusetts isn't the only state having to protect and save NH residents while cleaning up after NH's so called form of justice served. There have been other states having to do so too.
"That committee's final report included two anecdotes of out-of-state residents arrested in Massachusetts with large hauls of New Hampshire-purchased booze. One of those arrests included 1,676 bottles of Hennessy, bought at multiple locations. The driver was charged with possessing untaxed liquor and unlawfully transporting liquor.
Liquor enforcement officials in Vermont have made two arrests, one involving an estimated $40,000 worth of New Hampshire-purchased liquor in the back of an SUV, the other with an estimated $28,000 worth. Both suspects were charged with crossing state lines in possession of more than 9 liters of alcohol, Vermont's current legal limit."
"The product that was the most prominent in both of these cases was Hennessy cognac," says Patrick Delaney, Vermont's commissioner of liquor control, who backs increasing the financial penalties for those caught illegally importing large quantities of liquor. He adds that "by using cash, there is obviously no paper trail, if an authority were to investigate it, The activity itself is basically tax evasion."
“From our perspective, this is organized criminal activity,” says Gary Kessler, deputy commissioner at the Vermont Department of Liquor Control."
More Evidence on NH's so called form of intelligent justice
In 2003 The case of Blanchflower v Blanchflower went before the NH State Supreme Court.
Before addressing the merits, we note this appeal is not about the status of homosexual relationships in our society or the formal recognition of homosexual unions. The narrow question before us is whether a homosexual sexual relationship between a married person and another constitutes adultery within the meaning of RSA 458:7, II.
RSA 458:7 provides, in part: “A divorce from the bonds of matrimony shall be decreed in favor of the innocent party for any of the following causes: ․ II. Adultery of either party.” The statute does not define adultery. Id. Accordingly, we must discern its meaning according to our rules of statutory construction.
(So basically Screw the laws!)
“In matters of statutory interpretation, this court is the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of a statute considered as a whole.” Wegner v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 N.H. 107, 108, 803 A.2d 598 (2002) (quotation omitted). We first look to the language of the statute itself and, where terms are not defined therein, “we ascribe to them their plain and ordinary meanings.” Id.
The plain and ordinary meaning of adultery is “voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband.” Webster's Third New International Dictionary 30 (unabridged ed.1961). Although the definition does not specifically state that the “someone” with whom one commits adultery must be of the opposite gender, it does require sexual intercourse.
The plain and ordinary meaning of sexual intercourse is “sexual connection esp. between humans: COITUS, COPULATION.” Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2082. Coitus is defined to require “insertion of the penis in the vagina[ ],” Webster's Third New International Dictionary 441, which clearly can only take place between persons of the opposite gender.
We also note that “[a] law means what it meant to its framers and its mere repassage does not alter that meaning.” Appeal of Naswa Motor Inn, 144 N.H. 89, 91, 738 A.2d 349 (1999) (quotation omitted). The statutory compilation in which the provision now codified as RSA 458:7 first appeared is the Revised Statutes of 1842. See RS 148:3 (1842). No definition of adultery was contained in that statute. See id. Our cases from that approximate time period, however, support the inference that adultery meant intercourse. See Adams v. Adams, 20 N.H. 299, 301 (1850); Burns v. Burns, 68 N.H. 33, 34, 44 A. 76 (1894).
Cases from this period also indicate that adultery as a ground for divorce was equated with the crime of adultery and was alleged as such in libels for divorce. See, e.g., Sheafe v. Sheafe, 24 N.H. 564, 564 (1852); White v. White, 45 N.H. 121, 121 (1863). Although the criminal adultery statute in the 1842 compilation also did not define adultery, see RS 219:1 (1842), roughly contemporaneous case law is instructive: “Adultery is committed whenever there is an intercourse from which spurious issue may arise․” State v. Wallace, 9 N.H. 515, 517 (1838); see also State v. Taylor, 58 N.H. 331, 331 (1878) (same). As “spurious issue” can only arise from intercourse between a man and a woman, criminal adultery could only be committed with a person of the opposite gender.
We note that the current criminal adultery statute still requires sexual intercourse: “A person is guilty of a class B misdemeanor if, being a married person, he engages in sexual intercourse with another not his spouse or, being unmarried, engages in sexual intercourse with another known by him to be married.” RSA 645:3 (1996). Based upon the foregoing, we conclude that adultery under RSA 458:7, II does not include homosexual relationships." (This is false)
This is all completely false and ridiculously recklessly plain outright stupidity! Instead of being so fixated on looking up definitions for "sexual intercourse, coitus, copulation" which actually had nothing to do with this case, the courts once again, chose to completely ignore the specifics of "the words of a statute (itself) considered as a whole.” Therefore, The "definition of adultery was contained in that statute." The statement is clear in plain english. "Engages in sexual intercourse with another." Another is clearly defined in the English dictionary (had they bothered to look) as, "someone or something different and in addition to." Therefore, a homosexual affairs is simply something different that is in addition to sexual intercourse. Therefore it simply did constitute adultery because the terms were clearly "defined within the meaning of the law", plain and simple. Therefore, "the definition does not (actually thoroughly) specifically state that the “someone” with whom one commits adultery must be of the opposite gender, it does (DOES NOT) require sexual intercourse." The NH Supreme Court and the entire judicial branch of government will never even do as they say, which was, "this court is the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of a statute considered as a whole.”
Another adultery case, Ross v Ross, went before the NH State Supreme Court in 2016. Kysa Crusco, a NH Family Law Attorney and Guardian Ad Litem out of Bedford NH, clearly summarized this case in nutshell in a form of a blog.
"The New Hampshire Supreme Court (still illegally Narrow Mindedly along with plain brazen stupidity) ruled that sexual intercourse does not include all types of sexual contact. The Court states that sexual intercourse is limited to sexual acts that could lead to the conception of a baby. Accordingly, a homosexual affair does not rise to the level of adultery under New Hampshire law. Equally, an emotional affair does not constitute adultery for purposes of obtaining a divorce. However, an emotional affair which causes significant emotional distress to the innocent spouse may result in a separate fault ground known as “conduct to injure health and reason." Like I said, they are truly one hell of a law breaking cult full of nothing but law breaking lies!
If they could only now actually just truthfully pertain it to the actual evidence of the actual case and the actual laws of this state, we just might finally actually have a justice system in NH! Well at least we now know why NH Judge Albee only uses online Zillow instead of the actual facts and evidence of the cases brought before her, or will even use the NH laws for that matter, when making her final decisions on a daily basis.
In 1978 The NH Supreme Court wrote Article 73A which was voted in by both NH's politicians and NH voters. This is what was written as article 73A on the ballot in 1978.
In 1 of many family court rules that the NH State Supreme Court has written, was in 2010, that was a much needed well overdue mandatory family court rule. It demands that all debts, property deeds, bank statements, retirement plan statements, investment statements, all life insurance statements and medical coverage policies, with a specific time period required for each, to all be submitted to the courts within 45 days of the filing. But then in this very same rule, it clearly then suddenly states, "2. The parties may redact all but the last four (4) digits of any account numbers and social security numbers that appear on any statements or documents." Are you kidding me??? Not only does this sentence defeat the purpose of the entire rule to begin with, but it most certainly breaks NH state law along with the United States Codes for the entire country. This is nothing more than lazy careless illegal justice in the state of NH.
Title LXII - CRIMINAL CODE
Chapter 641 - FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
Section 641:7 - Tampering With Public Records or Information.
Universal Citation: NH Rev Stat § 641:7 (2015)
641:7 Tampering With Public Records or Information. – A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if he:
I. Knowingly makes a false entry in or false alteration of any thing belonging to, received, or kept by the government for information or record, or required by law to be kept for information of the government; or
II. Presents or uses any thing knowing it to be false, and with a purpose that it be taken as a genuine part of information or records referred to in paragraph I; or
III. Purposely and unlawfully destroys, conceals, removes or otherwise impairs the verity or availability of any such thing.
Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973.
Title LXII - CRIMINAL CODE
Chapter 638 - FRAUD
Section 638:2 - Fraudulent Handling of Recordable Writings.
Universal Citation: NH Rev Stat § 638:2 (2015)
638:2 Fraudulent Handling of Recordable Writings. – A person is guilty of a class B felony if, with a purpose to deceive or injure anyone, he falsifies, destroys, removes or conceals any will, deed, mortgage, security instrument or other writing for which the law provides public recording.
Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973.
18 U.S.C. § 1505 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress--Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331 ), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
In 1991, the NH Supreme Court also upheld Judge Groff's decision to overturn a conviction of a Lowell, Mass man, who was found guilty of sexually assaulting a young boy in Nashua. All because the boy used the word "bum" rather than "anus" in his testimony. Groff found that the boy's testimony wasn't enough to prove sexual penetration and the NH Supreme Court agreed. Months later, that same man plead guilty to sexual assault charges involving the same boy, but only now it was in Massachusetts.
Massachusetts isn't the only state having to protect and save NH residents while cleaning up after NH's so called form of justice served. There have been other states having to do so too.
"In fact, in 2012, it was a top GOP lawmaker who called for a special House committee to investigate potential wrongdoing within the NH Liquor Commission, including how it handles large cash purchases.
"That committee's final report included two anecdotes of out-of-state residents arrested in Massachusetts with large hauls of New Hampshire-purchased booze. One of those arrests included 1,676 bottles of Hennessy, bought at multiple locations. The driver was charged with possessing untaxed liquor and unlawfully transporting liquor.
Liquor enforcement officials in Vermont have made two arrests, one involving an estimated $40,000 worth of New Hampshire-purchased liquor in the back of an SUV, the other with an estimated $28,000 worth. Both suspects were charged with crossing state lines in possession of more than 9 liters of alcohol, Vermont's current legal limit."
"The product that was the most prominent in both of these cases was Hennessy cognac," says Patrick Delaney, Vermont's commissioner of liquor control, who backs increasing the financial penalties for those caught illegally importing large quantities of liquor. He adds that "by using cash, there is obviously no paper trail, if an authority were to investigate it, The activity itself is basically tax evasion."
“From our perspective, this is organized criminal activity,” says Gary Kessler, deputy commissioner at the Vermont Department of Liquor Control."
"Along with New York, court records show Kessler’s agency has also sent investigators to stake out New Hampshire liquor store parking lots in recent months, including in Peterborough and Keene. When the customers crossed back into Vermont with trucks full of booze, they were arrested for violating that state’s liquor laws.
“Clearly, these guys aren’t just randomly deciding that they are going to come up and buy some cases of alcohol,” Kessler says. “They are coming up here with shopping lists, these guys had a notebook, they have the money and the gift cards.”
"These operations by other states are happening without the assistance or knowledge of New Hampshire officials. The New Hampshire Liquor Commission, which oversees 79 retail stores statewide, says it wasn't notified. Neither was the attorney general’s office or New Hampshire State Police." The NH Attorney General's office finally got around to warranting an investigation 6 years later in 2018.
More Evidence on NH's so called form of intelligent justice
In 2003 The case of Blanchflower v Blanchflower went before the NH State Supreme Court.
This was their Final Ruling:
"The record supports the following facts. The petitioner filed for divorce from the respondent on grounds of irreconcilable differences. He subsequently moved to amend the petition to assert the fault ground of adultery under RSA 458:7, II. Specifically, the petitioner alleged that the respondent has been involved in a “continuing adulterous affair” with the co-respondent, a woman, resulting in the irremediable breakdown of the parties' marriage. The co-respondent sought to dismiss the amended petition, contending that a homosexual relationship between two people, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery under RSA 458:7, II. The trial court disagreed, and the co-respondent brought this appeal.
Before addressing the merits, we note this appeal is not about the status of homosexual relationships in our society or the formal recognition of homosexual unions. The narrow question before us is whether a homosexual sexual relationship between a married person and another constitutes adultery within the meaning of RSA 458:7, II.
RSA 458:7 provides, in part: “A divorce from the bonds of matrimony shall be decreed in favor of the innocent party for any of the following causes: ․ II. Adultery of either party.” The statute does not define adultery. Id. Accordingly, we must discern its meaning according to our rules of statutory construction.
(So basically Screw the laws!)
“In matters of statutory interpretation, this court is the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of a statute considered as a whole.” Wegner v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 N.H. 107, 108, 803 A.2d 598 (2002) (quotation omitted). We first look to the language of the statute itself and, where terms are not defined therein, “we ascribe to them their plain and ordinary meanings.” Id.
The plain and ordinary meaning of adultery is “voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband.” Webster's Third New International Dictionary 30 (unabridged ed.1961). Although the definition does not specifically state that the “someone” with whom one commits adultery must be of the opposite gender, it does require sexual intercourse.
The plain and ordinary meaning of sexual intercourse is “sexual connection esp. between humans: COITUS, COPULATION.” Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2082. Coitus is defined to require “insertion of the penis in the vagina[ ],” Webster's Third New International Dictionary 441, which clearly can only take place between persons of the opposite gender.
We also note that “[a] law means what it meant to its framers and its mere repassage does not alter that meaning.” Appeal of Naswa Motor Inn, 144 N.H. 89, 91, 738 A.2d 349 (1999) (quotation omitted). The statutory compilation in which the provision now codified as RSA 458:7 first appeared is the Revised Statutes of 1842. See RS 148:3 (1842). No definition of adultery was contained in that statute. See id. Our cases from that approximate time period, however, support the inference that adultery meant intercourse. See Adams v. Adams, 20 N.H. 299, 301 (1850); Burns v. Burns, 68 N.H. 33, 34, 44 A. 76 (1894).
Cases from this period also indicate that adultery as a ground for divorce was equated with the crime of adultery and was alleged as such in libels for divorce. See, e.g., Sheafe v. Sheafe, 24 N.H. 564, 564 (1852); White v. White, 45 N.H. 121, 121 (1863). Although the criminal adultery statute in the 1842 compilation also did not define adultery, see RS 219:1 (1842), roughly contemporaneous case law is instructive: “Adultery is committed whenever there is an intercourse from which spurious issue may arise․” State v. Wallace, 9 N.H. 515, 517 (1838); see also State v. Taylor, 58 N.H. 331, 331 (1878) (same). As “spurious issue” can only arise from intercourse between a man and a woman, criminal adultery could only be committed with a person of the opposite gender.
We note that the current criminal adultery statute still requires sexual intercourse: “A person is guilty of a class B misdemeanor if, being a married person, he engages in sexual intercourse with another not his spouse or, being unmarried, engages in sexual intercourse with another known by him to be married.” RSA 645:3 (1996). Based upon the foregoing, we conclude that adultery under RSA 458:7, II does not include homosexual relationships." (This is false)
This is all completely false and ridiculously recklessly plain outright stupidity! Instead of being so fixated on looking up definitions for "sexual intercourse, coitus, copulation" which actually had nothing to do with this case, the courts once again, chose to completely ignore the specifics of "the words of a statute (itself) considered as a whole.” Therefore, The "definition of adultery was contained in that statute." The statement is clear in plain english. "Engages in sexual intercourse with another." Another is clearly defined in the English dictionary (had they bothered to look) as, "someone or something different and in addition to." Therefore, a homosexual affairs is simply something different that is in addition to sexual intercourse. Therefore it simply did constitute adultery because the terms were clearly "defined within the meaning of the law", plain and simple. Therefore, "the definition does not (actually thoroughly) specifically state that the “someone” with whom one commits adultery must be of the opposite gender, it does (DOES NOT) require sexual intercourse." The NH Supreme Court and the entire judicial branch of government will never even do as they say, which was, "this court is the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of a statute considered as a whole.”
Another adultery case, Ross v Ross, went before the NH State Supreme Court in 2016. Kysa Crusco, a NH Family Law Attorney and Guardian Ad Litem out of Bedford NH, clearly summarized this case in nutshell in a form of a blog.
The Facts
Husband and wife met in dental school and later married. Husband, who had his own endodontist practice, helped his wife open and build her orthodontist practice. Considerable money was put into the venture. The couple separated the day that husband discovered wife was having an affair with another dentist. Wife filed for divorce 5 days after the parties separated alleging both fault and irreconcilable differences as grounds. Husband cross-petitioned for divorce on fault-based grounds, due to the wife’s alleged adultery and irreconcilable differences. The parties had been married for 9 years at the time they filed for divorce.
Approximately 11 months after the divorce was file, husband began a sexual relationship with the ex-wife of the dentist that the wife was dating. Wife filed a motion to dismiss the adultery grounds pled against her. She argued the defense of recrimination, or in other words that the husband was no longer an “innocent spouse” because of his own adultery. The trial court agreed with wife and dismissed the husband’s fault grounds. The trial court issued a decree of divorce based on irreconcilable differences that divided the property with an intent to split it equally.
The Appeal
Husband appealed the dismissal of the fault-based ground in his cross-petition for divorce, arguing that his sexual relationship, which occurred eleven months after the parties’ separation, could not be used as a basis for the defense of recrimination. Husband asserted that such a holding would require parties to remain celibate during years of litigation in a contentious divorce. Wife argued the trial court did not err in granting the motion to dismiss because the respondent was not an “innocent party” within the meaning of the statute. RSA 458:7 (2004).
The Court examined RSA 458:7, which states that a divorce “shall be decreed in favor of the innocent party.” The statute requires that one be an “innocent party” at the time of the decree. The statute makes no exception for fault based grounds that arise prior to the final decree, regardless of whether they arise before or after the filing of the divorce petition. Therefore, the trial court correctly considered Husband’s post-petition conduct when deciding the motion to dismiss.
The Court further stated the fact that Husband’s adultery did not lead to the breakdown of the marriage does not bar recrimination as a defense, stating “Causation is not an element of the defense of recrimination.” The Court affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the fault grounds and grant a divorce on irreconcilable differences.
The Takeaway
The conclusion of husband’s brief, artfully written by Attorney Joshua Gordon, argues: “It is not reasonable to suggest, in these times of protracted discovery and litigation, that a party to a divorce must remain celibate for the duration of the proceedings – here already longer than four years.” I happen to agree with him. Litigation can be a long and arduous process. While most divorces will settle within 6 months to 1 year, a small percentage can drag on. The longest divorce I have seen from start to finish has been 5 years. That is a long time to wait to date.
Why pursue the adultery grounds in the first place? It appears in this case that there was some significant bad blood between the parties. Husband had helped wife open her orthodontic practice and contributed financially and emotionally to that endeavor. In return, wife carried on an affair with a colleague for approximately five years. Wife changed the locks to the house two days after husband left. Husband may have been pursuing the emotional victory of a fault based divorce for wife’s cheating.
Husband may also have been pursuing the adultery grounds for the financial benefit. RSA 458:16-a, II provides that a court may divide property unequally when it would be appropriate and equitable to do so after considering one more of the statutory factors. One of the factors reads: “The fault of either party as specified in RSA 458:7 if said fault caused the breakdown of the marriage and: (1) Caused substantial physical or mental pain and suffering; or (2) Resulted in substantial economic loss to the marital estate or the injured party.” With the dental practices, marital home and savings and investments on the line, an uneven split make a substantial difference in the outcome."
When there was even a NH adultery law in effect:
Husband and wife met in dental school and later married. Husband, who had his own endodontist practice, helped his wife open and build her orthodontist practice. Considerable money was put into the venture. The couple separated the day that husband discovered wife was having an affair with another dentist. Wife filed for divorce 5 days after the parties separated alleging both fault and irreconcilable differences as grounds. Husband cross-petitioned for divorce on fault-based grounds, due to the wife’s alleged adultery and irreconcilable differences. The parties had been married for 9 years at the time they filed for divorce.
Approximately 11 months after the divorce was file, husband began a sexual relationship with the ex-wife of the dentist that the wife was dating. Wife filed a motion to dismiss the adultery grounds pled against her. She argued the defense of recrimination, or in other words that the husband was no longer an “innocent spouse” because of his own adultery. The trial court agreed with wife and dismissed the husband’s fault grounds. The trial court issued a decree of divorce based on irreconcilable differences that divided the property with an intent to split it equally.
The Appeal
Husband appealed the dismissal of the fault-based ground in his cross-petition for divorce, arguing that his sexual relationship, which occurred eleven months after the parties’ separation, could not be used as a basis for the defense of recrimination. Husband asserted that such a holding would require parties to remain celibate during years of litigation in a contentious divorce. Wife argued the trial court did not err in granting the motion to dismiss because the respondent was not an “innocent party” within the meaning of the statute. RSA 458:7 (2004).
The Court examined RSA 458:7, which states that a divorce “shall be decreed in favor of the innocent party.” The statute requires that one be an “innocent party” at the time of the decree. The statute makes no exception for fault based grounds that arise prior to the final decree, regardless of whether they arise before or after the filing of the divorce petition. Therefore, the trial court correctly considered Husband’s post-petition conduct when deciding the motion to dismiss.
The Court further stated the fact that Husband’s adultery did not lead to the breakdown of the marriage does not bar recrimination as a defense, stating “Causation is not an element of the defense of recrimination.” The Court affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the fault grounds and grant a divorce on irreconcilable differences.
The Takeaway
The conclusion of husband’s brief, artfully written by Attorney Joshua Gordon, argues: “It is not reasonable to suggest, in these times of protracted discovery and litigation, that a party to a divorce must remain celibate for the duration of the proceedings – here already longer than four years.” I happen to agree with him. Litigation can be a long and arduous process. While most divorces will settle within 6 months to 1 year, a small percentage can drag on. The longest divorce I have seen from start to finish has been 5 years. That is a long time to wait to date.
Why pursue the adultery grounds in the first place? It appears in this case that there was some significant bad blood between the parties. Husband had helped wife open her orthodontic practice and contributed financially and emotionally to that endeavor. In return, wife carried on an affair with a colleague for approximately five years. Wife changed the locks to the house two days after husband left. Husband may have been pursuing the emotional victory of a fault based divorce for wife’s cheating.
Husband may also have been pursuing the adultery grounds for the financial benefit. RSA 458:16-a, II provides that a court may divide property unequally when it would be appropriate and equitable to do so after considering one more of the statutory factors. One of the factors reads: “The fault of either party as specified in RSA 458:7 if said fault caused the breakdown of the marriage and: (1) Caused substantial physical or mental pain and suffering; or (2) Resulted in substantial economic loss to the marital estate or the injured party.” With the dental practices, marital home and savings and investments on the line, an uneven split make a substantial difference in the outcome."
When there was even a NH adultery law in effect:
"The New Hampshire Supreme Court (still illegally Narrow Mindedly along with plain brazen stupidity) ruled that sexual intercourse does not include all types of sexual contact. The Court states that sexual intercourse is limited to sexual acts that could lead to the conception of a baby. Accordingly, a homosexual affair does not rise to the level of adultery under New Hampshire law. Equally, an emotional affair does not constitute adultery for purposes of obtaining a divorce. However, an emotional affair which causes significant emotional distress to the innocent spouse may result in a separate fault ground known as “conduct to injure health and reason." Like I said, they are truly one hell of a law breaking cult full of nothing but law breaking lies!
If they could only now actually just truthfully pertain it to the actual evidence of the actual case and the actual laws of this state, we just might finally actually have a justice system in NH! Well at least we now know why NH Judge Albee only uses online Zillow instead of the actual facts and evidence of the cases brought before her, or will even use the NH laws for that matter, when making her final decisions on a daily basis.
In 1978 The NH Supreme Court wrote Article 73A which was voted in by both NH's politicians and NH voters. This is what was written as article 73A on the ballot in 1978.
Article 73-a (1978)
"[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts."
"[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts."
However, this is what mysteriously appears on the books and is enforced by NH courts to this day. As you will see, it suddenly appears with 1 additional sentence added at the end of the paragraph that was never seen nor voted on because it was never on the ballot.
Article 73-a (1978)
"[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts. The rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law."
"[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts. The rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law."
No NH Supreme Court rules have ever been voted on and passed by legislators that "shall have the force and effect of law", let alone was actually signed in as a law by a NH governor.
WHY EVEN HAVE LAW ENFOREMENT RISKING THEIR LIVES ON A DAILY BASIS TO ONLY CATCH AND BRING CRIMINALS IN TO BE JUDGED SIMPLY BY A CRIMINAL ABUSING THE POER OF JUSTICE?????
WHY EVEN HAVE LAW ENFOREMENT RISKING THEIR LIVES ON A DAILY BASIS TO ONLY CATCH AND BRING CRIMINALS IN TO BE JUDGED SIMPLY BY A CRIMINAL ABUSING THE POER OF JUSTICE?????
Social Monogamy is actually a term used to refer to "creatures that pair up to mate and raise their off-springs but still will have flings on the side," A true monogamous mammal is a goose that will never mate again even if it's mate was killed.
Daniel Kruger, a Social and Evolutionary Psychologist at the University of Michigan's School of Public Health was noted to say, "like most mammals, we are a polygamous species."
(However another said, "medically speaking, more and more every day, we are beginning to show signs of one of the higher causes that will end up bringing us to our own demise.")
Another professor of sociology at the University of Washington Seattle, Pepper Schwartz, was noted saying, "I don't think we are a monogamous animal."
(However another said, "medically speaking, more and more every day, we are beginning to show signs of one of the higher causes that will end up bringing us to our own demise.")
Another professor of sociology at the University of Washington Seattle, Pepper Schwartz, was noted saying, "I don't think we are a monogamous animal."
There are roughly 5,000 species known to form a lifelong bond and the majority of humans are definitely not one of them.
According to Stressgen Biotechnology's research, HPV is only one of the most common STD's transmitted in the world. HPV is also 'THE' major risk factor now for more than one cancer that might take years to show.
The papilloma virus lives in the cells of the outer skin as well as inside the body, mainly in the vagina, anal, and urethra. HPV can show no visible skin changes while hiding inactive infections that can only be detected microscopically within the skin cells. And it is only found by using special tests that only specifically look for HPV-DNA. When screening for STD's is done, this test is not included, When condoms are not completely covering the entire shaft of the penis or pubic skin, hidden and inactive papilloma cells can transfer and pass from a man's pubic area into the vagina, vulva, and anus simply through a skin to skin contact.
The papilloma virus lives in the cells of the outer skin as well as inside the body, mainly in the vagina, anal, and urethra. HPV can show no visible skin changes while hiding inactive infections that can only be detected microscopically within the skin cells. And it is only found by using special tests that only specifically look for HPV-DNA. When screening for STD's is done, this test is not included, When condoms are not completely covering the entire shaft of the penis or pubic skin, hidden and inactive papilloma cells can transfer and pass from a man's pubic area into the vagina, vulva, and anus simply through a skin to skin contact.
According to the CDC, 79 million Americans, now mostly in their teens and 20's, are infected with HPV. Studies conducted by the Kaise Foundation initially found out that 70% of Americans knew nothing about HPV as a sexually transmitted disease, and they did not know one very important fact. That it cannot be detected by common regular STD screening. This is becoming a very serious problem in more ways than one.
to find out the numbers of HPV-Attributed cancers, multiply the number of HPV associated cancer by the % of probably caused HPV cases. This is how to find out the number of HPV-Attributed Cancer totals.
NUMBER OF HPV-ASSOCIATED CANCERS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE BETWEEN 1999 TO 2013
No. of HPV % of cases Probably No. of HPV
Cancer Site Associated cancers Caused by HPV Attributed cancers
Anus 309 X 91% = 281
Oropharynx 954 72% 687
Cervix 624 91% 568
Vagina 49 75% 37
Vulva 248 69% 171
Penis 67 63% 42
TOTAL 2,251 1,786
Number of New Hampshire STD's Reported By Year Between 2012 to 2016
By The NH Division of Public Health Services
__________________________________________________________________
By The NH Division of Public Health Services
__________________________________________________________________
YEAR Chlamydia Gonorrhea Syphilis HIV AIDS TOTAL_STD'S
2012 3,070 148 49 47 27 3,341
2013 3,132 118 45 35 17 3,347
2014 2,311 230 54 38 16 2,649
2015 3 ,687 247 45 23 15 4,417
_2016 4,038 467 71 41 22 4,639
2013 3,132 118 45 35 17 3,347
2014 2,311 230 54 38 16 2,649
2015 3 ,687 247 45 23 15 4,417
_2016 4,038 467 71 41 22 4,639
TOTAL 16,238 1,210 264 184 97 18,393
Children are also being infected by STD's at a younger age in NH now. Between 2012 to 2016 the state of NH had a total of 16,238 cases of chlamydia reported from all age groups throughout the state. However, the report broke it down and surprisingly showed that there actually were 4,170 cases between the ages of 13 to 19. While 7,228 cases were diagnosed between the ages of 20 to 24. And an additional 2,673 cases were diagnosed between the ages of 25 to 29 years of age. There were only 2,167 cases that were spread out between the ages of 30 to 60+ yrs of age. Safe sex today is only having extremely minimal to no sex partners meaning no more than 1 or 2 in a lifetime.
With Chlamydia patients, all of their sexual partners must be notified and treated with antibiotics, even if they don't show or experience any symptoms. This will prevent any long-term complications or further spread of the infection onto others.
The hack was bad enough, but the information revealed as part of the breach was pretty damning for the company. The list of names appeared to show that upwards of 95% of Ashley Madison's members were men. that were on the website at the time of the hack."
This was anything but a resolution to a clear existing age old problem. So we really don't need to look very far to find out why its happening or who is dong it now do we. NH judges can clearly no longer claim, "there's no evidence of adultery here!"
In February 2014, a cancer cluster within the NH 10 towns Seacoast area involved two rare pediatric cancers that killed several seacoast children, that were identified and confirmed by the state Department of Health and human Services.
In 2016, it was also determined by the Department of Health and Human Services officials that there was a small cancer cluster of rhabdomyosarcoma, or RMS. While looking at the RMS cases, the state also identified “a small excess of pediatric lung cancer cases,” all of which “were of a single rare type called pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB).”
In 2017, no common exposures were found linking the cancers according to DHS. "State Epidemiologist Benjamin Chan acknowledged there were seven brain or central nervous system pediatric cancers detected in the towns of Rye, New Castle, Portsmouth, Greenland and North Hampton during a period when they expected to see 3.1. He determined this did not represent another cancer cluster because the cancers were different types of brain cancers."
Dr. Tom Sherman, a former state representative from Rye who chaired the Seacoast Pediatric Cancer Cluster formed by then-Gov. Maggie Hassan said he believes, “it’s a complete mistake to feel terribly reassured by anything we’ve learned so far.” Many NH parents of children diagnosed with cancer strongly believe there may be an unknown environmental cause that is triggering the illness. “The lack of knowledge does not equate to safety,” Sherman said.
Research was done by the task force committee that was established by then-Governor Maggie Hassan. Contamination was found leaching from a 27-acre Superfund cleanup site in North Hampton and Greenland, named Coakley Landfill, which raised serious concerns by the task force.
"Tests done on wells at the landfill have found PFAS chemicals and 1,4-dioxane - both suspected carcinogens - at levels above the Environmental Protection Agency’s health advisory levels. PFAS chemicals in Berry’s Brook at the edge of the dump tested dramatically higher than the EPA’s health advisory levels.
State Rep. Mindi Messmer, D-Rye, who chaired a subcommittee on the landfill, noted during a recent interview that the Coakley landfill “lies geographically right smack in the middle of this cancer cluster.”
Nearby residential wells and wells at golf courses have pulled the water from under the landfill’s cap, Messmer said.
“We found that these PFCs were contaminating the water in the landfill and migrating into other areas in the towns of North Hampton, Hampton, Rye and Greenland,” Messmer said. “That’s why we’re investigating it.”
Studies on PFAS chemicals have determined they could also cause low birth weights, harm a child’s development and increase cholesterol, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry."
"Messmer said she’s learned about four cases of adult RMS in the Rye area. “That’s highly unusually that adults will get RMS,” she said. She’s also learned about two adult onset cases of RMS in Merrimack."
Well at lest we now have an idea where NH drug dens are actually located throughout the statehouse in NH. But please lets not forget the homeless crisis, opioid addiction crisis, and the lack of mental healthcare crisis that continues to still dominate a domino effect of a never ending increase to NH's 'suicide crisis' now still continuing throughout the state now for the past 3 decades. Which is now another whole saga and chapter alone in NH. And NH's government's repeated excuses are that all of this is? Well, "these problems exist throughout the rest of the entire country!" So if NH's government clearly tells everyone to suddenly drive off a cliff tomorrow, just because the entire country is now doing it, apparently you will now clearly understand why and where it came from, the NH government.
To truly show how consciencous NH's government really pays attention towards the state's problems, while in serious crisis mode, NH even attempted on 3 different occasions to now numb the voters to their existing problems by voting to lower the drinking age to 18 while all of these issues still remained in a negative progression still even 3 decades later. Not just only once, not even just twice, but 3 individual times and thankfully by the grace of god they failed each time. NH continues to have multiple addiction crisis plans and mental healthcare plans one right after another that quickly tends to only immediately fail early on in the process.
In 2006, NH came up with another poor plan to end homelessness. This one was arrogantly titled the "ten year plan to end homelessness in NH," that drastically once again began to fail just 2 years into it. Gee, was this idea from the rest of the country too? In 2008, in Manchester alone, the 10 year plan defined 1,500 as homeless, for which 400 were children alone. Then 10 years later over 1,700 people had to be treated by the city of Manchester's $1.5 million healthcare program for the homeless. "Elissa Margolin of Housing Action NH contends that the state needs to do more to increase the supply of affordable housing."
"According to Margolin, Vermont has bonded $35 million in addition to another $10 million a year later. Maine bonded $50 million in 2010, and every year had committed between $6 million and $12 million to affordable housing. And Massachusetts bonded $1 billion over 5 years. "We (NH) came in with the chamber of commerce and asked for $25 million and only got $2.5 million."
Business Insider combined six measures of labor-market and general economic health for all the states and the District of Columbia. By putting all those on a common scale and combining them, they came up with an overall score for each state's economy. Now because NH refuses to pay their promises, debts and needs to the state for the past 50 years. In a state where the average weekly wages declined 1.2% between August 2017 and August 2018. Now has become the third-worst rated economy among the 50 states and DC.
When your state's government becomes well known through the united States Justice Department only for bootlegging liquor to continue to very poorly and illegally rob Peter to pay Paul, just to continue to keep running from bill collectors, for repeatedly making broken promises, while breaking more than just one law in the process; exactly what else would the final outcome be of the domino games that NH continues to play?
Just FYI: NH state law does require municipalities to help people who are destitute. Including those who are otherwise unable to obtain shelter. Not that any actual law in NH state would actually be enforced by the government itself. However, while the NH Supreme Court recklessly continues to write, inflict, and enforce, non existing laws and illegal rules that only continue to break actual NH state laws, then you can surely most certainly not expect, anything less or better from the rest of NH's entire government. If I can clearly find and see these problems with a brain injury that was only purposely inflicted by the state of NH's government's own stupidity, then what the hell is their excuse now!?!?!?!?!?!
NH CHLAMYDIA CASES
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR
AGE GROUP 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
13 - 19 923 824 573 890 960
20 - 24 1,354 1,450 1,026 1,612 1,786
25 - 29 455 474 372 659 713
TOTAL 2,732 2,748 1,971 3,161 3,459
With Chlamydia patients, all of their sexual partners must be notified and treated with antibiotics, even if they don't show or experience any symptoms. This will prevent any long-term complications or further spread of the infection onto others.
Untreated Chlamydia in women, or Pelvic Inflammatory Disease infections in females can cause vaginal irritation, vaginal discharge, lower abdominal pain, painful intercourse, bleeding between menstrual cycles, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, fever, infertility or ectopic tubular pregnancies.
Untreated Chlamydia in men can cause discharge from the tip of the penis, a burning feeling during urination, or Epididymitis, which is an inflammation of the coil tubes in the back of the testicles. This can result in testicular swelling, pain, and also yes, can even cause infertility too.
NH GONORRHEA CASES
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR
AGE GROUP 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
13 - 19 25 9 27 31 48
20 - 24 47 39 66 74 106
25 - 29 39 22 60 40 92
13 - 29 Totals 111 70 153 145 246
30 - 60+ Totals 37 48 77 101 220
In 2016 is when NH had an outbreak of Gonorrhea showing that the number of cases became significantly higher by 250% in just one year and remained actively working to identify individuals who have been exposed. According to the CDC, Gonorrhea is the second most common reported STD in the United States.
In 2017, NH reported that 15% of individuals diagnosed with Gonorrhea did not initially receive the correct treatment. Treatment of Gonorrhea needs to include 2 different antibiotic to prevent the emergence of antibiotic resistance. The CDC listed gonorrhea as one of the top 3 national antibiotic resist threats because of the propensity of Neisseria Gonorrhea to develop a resistance to antibiotics.
One of NH's responses to the STD outbreaks was May 9, 2017, with NH law RSA 141-C:15-a - The practice of EPT- Expedited Partner Therapy is explicitly legal and allowable according to NH. EPT refers to a healthcare provider who gives their STD infected patient additional antibiotics or an additional antibiotic prescription to now give to the patients partner also. So they too can be treated without the provider ever needing to examine the partner first.
However there are numerous parents and physiciams who don't agree. Every case is different and they feel that the state is being reckless by irresponsibly enabling and detouring many young adults from responsibly seeking their own providers for an accurate diagnoses and treatment so as to always establish and have a proper medical record history on file, that could very well save their life one day.
NH INFECTIOUS SYPHILIS CASES
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
13 - 19 25 9 27 31 48
20 - 24 47 39 66 74 106
25 - 29 39 22 60 40 92
13 - 29 Totals 111 70 153 145 246
30 - 60+ Totals 37 48 77 101 220
In 2016 is when NH had an outbreak of Gonorrhea showing that the number of cases became significantly higher by 250% in just one year and remained actively working to identify individuals who have been exposed. According to the CDC, Gonorrhea is the second most common reported STD in the United States.
In 2017, NH reported that 15% of individuals diagnosed with Gonorrhea did not initially receive the correct treatment. Treatment of Gonorrhea needs to include 2 different antibiotic to prevent the emergence of antibiotic resistance. The CDC listed gonorrhea as one of the top 3 national antibiotic resist threats because of the propensity of Neisseria Gonorrhea to develop a resistance to antibiotics.
One of NH's responses to the STD outbreaks was May 9, 2017, with NH law RSA 141-C:15-a - The practice of EPT- Expedited Partner Therapy is explicitly legal and allowable according to NH. EPT refers to a healthcare provider who gives their STD infected patient additional antibiotics or an additional antibiotic prescription to now give to the patients partner also. So they too can be treated without the provider ever needing to examine the partner first.
However there are numerous parents and physiciams who don't agree. Every case is different and they feel that the state is being reckless by irresponsibly enabling and detouring many young adults from responsibly seeking their own providers for an accurate diagnoses and treatment so as to always establish and have a proper medical record history on file, that could very well save their life one day.
NH INFECTIOUS SYPHILIS CASES
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR
AGE GROUP 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
13 - 19 0 2 2 2 1
20 - 24 8 6 10 6 7
25 - 29 7 5 3 7 10
13 - 29 Totals 15 13 15 15 18
30 - 60+ Totals 34 32 39 29 53
NH HIV CASES
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
13 - 29 Totals 15 13 15 15 18
30 - 60+ Totals 34 32 39 29 53
NH HIV CASES
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR
AGE GROUP 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
13 - 19 1 1 1 1 0
20 - 24 7 4 7 5 5
20 - 24 7 4 7 5 5
25 - 29 6 8 5 2 6
13 - 29 Totals 14 13 13 8 11
30 - 60+ Totals 33 21 25 15 30
NH AIDS CASES
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
13 - 29 Totals 14 13 13 8 11
30 - 60+ Totals 33 21 25 15 30
NH AIDS CASES
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR CASES FOR
AGE GROUP 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
13 - 19 0 0 0 0 0
20 - 24 1 2 1 2 0
20 - 24 1 2 1 2 0
25 - 29 3 0 2 2 3
13 - 29 Totals 4 2 3 4 3
30 - 60+ Totals 33 21 25 15 30
"CONCORD, NH – The state’s Public Health Division on Wednesday issued an alert to care providers around the state describing a notable increase in the number of new HIV and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cases in Hillsborough County.
Of recent concern, NH DPHS has been investigating a report of a homeless individual in Manchester who shares injection drug equipment, and has been diagnosed with acute HIV infection with a very high HIV viral load, which increases risk of transmission.
The alert was issued to physicians, health care providers, hospitals and health clinics.
New Hampshire’s annual number of new HIV cases has been stable (approximately 30-40 cases per year); however, Hillsborough County is experiencing a significant increase in the number of new HIV cases among those who report injection drug use as a risk factor.
Because new diagnoses of HCV infection are only reported to the NH DPHS by providers (no laboratory reporting of positive test results is performed), there has been significant underreporting of new HCV infections. We are asking providers, both primary and referral providers, to report new cases of HCV infection to the NH DPHS using the appropriate case report form.
Key Points and Recommendations for providers
13 - 29 Totals 4 2 3 4 3
30 - 60+ Totals 33 21 25 15 30
ALERT: NH AT 'HIGH RISK' OF UNCONTROLLED
HIV, HEPATITIS C DUE TO IV DRUG USE
NH Department of Health and Human Services
Government Health and Wellness
May 18, 2018
"CONCORD, NH – The state’s Public Health Division on Wednesday issued an alert to care providers around the state describing a notable increase in the number of new HIV and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cases in Hillsborough County.
Of recent concern, NH DPHS has been investigating a report of a homeless individual in Manchester who shares injection drug equipment, and has been diagnosed with acute HIV infection with a very high HIV viral load, which increases risk of transmission.
The alert was issued to physicians, health care providers, hospitals and health clinics.
New Hampshire’s annual number of new HIV cases has been stable (approximately 30-40 cases per year); however, Hillsborough County is experiencing a significant increase in the number of new HIV cases among those who report injection drug use as a risk factor.
- From January 1, 2017, through April 30, 2018, there were already 46 NH residents newly diagnosed with HIV.
- Of the 46 individuals, 11 (24 percent) reported injection drug use, a majority of whom lived in Hillsborough County at the time of their diagnosis.
- Fever
- Fatigue
- Loss of appetite
- Nausea
- Vomiting
- Abdominal pain
- Dark urine
- Clay-colored bowel movements
- Joint pain
- Jaundice (yellow color in the skin or eyes)
Because new diagnoses of HCV infection are only reported to the NH DPHS by providers (no laboratory reporting of positive test results is performed), there has been significant underreporting of new HCV infections. We are asking providers, both primary and referral providers, to report new cases of HCV infection to the NH DPHS using the appropriate case report form.
Key Points and Recommendations for providers
- New Hampshire is at high risk of uncontrolled HIV and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission due to the opioid epidemic and injection drug use.
- Providers should screen all patients who present to clinical care (regardless of the primary purpose of the visit) for substance use disorder, especially injection drug use.
- Individuals who have a history of substance misuse (especially injection drug use) should be tested for HIV and HCV.
- There have been multiple state outbreaks of hepatitis A virus infection associated with individuals who are homeless and individuals who use injection and non-injection drugs. All health care providers should assess for hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity in these higher risk patients and provide vaccination if not immune.
- All new diagnoses of HIV and HCV should be reported to the New Hampshire Division of Public Health Services (NH DPHS), including preliminary positive or rapid-reactive HIV and HCV results, by utilizing the appropriate forms.
- If a provider (primary or referral provider) is unsure if a new HIV or HCV case has been reported to NH DPHS, please err on the side of re-reporting. NH DPHS does not receive laboratory reports for positive HCV tests, and relies on provider reporting of new HCV diagnosis for accurate counts."
Another major issue is the one fact that while all this is happening, New Hampshire also felt the sudden reckless need to decriminalize Adultery altogether back on January 1, 2015. Then coincidentally just several months later, the Ashley Madison's, " Life Is Good, Have An Affair" website breach pops up, now publicly shaming and divulging close to 60,000 New Hampshire members on their website that was now hacked and divulged to the rest of the world.
"Avid Life said that reports of its imminent demise were "greatly exaggerated," and cheaters continued to use the site more than ever -- even though 32 million of its members' identities were revealed in the massive data breach.
The hack was bad enough, but the information revealed as part of the breach was pretty damning for the company. The list of names appeared to show that upwards of 95% of Ashley Madison's members were men. that were on the website at the time of the hack."
This was anything but a resolution to a clear existing age old problem. So we really don't need to look very far to find out why its happening or who is dong it now do we. NH judges can clearly no longer claim, "there's no evidence of adultery here!"
NH ALSO STILL CONTINUES DECADES LATER WITH CONTINUAL PROBLEMS WITH PUBLIC DRINKING WATER AND PRIVATE WELLS - THAT STILL TO THIS DAY REMAINS HIGHLY QUESTIONABLY SAFE FOR DECADES TO COME
According to the American Cancer Society's Cancer Statistic Center there will be another estimated 8,080 new cancer cases in New Hampshire with an estimated 2,810 deaths statewide in 2018.
CANCER CLUSTER THREATENS 10 NH SEACOAST TOWNS
In February 2014, a cancer cluster within the NH 10 towns Seacoast area involved two rare pediatric cancers that killed several seacoast children, that were identified and confirmed by the state Department of Health and human Services.
In 2016, it was also determined by the Department of Health and Human Services officials that there was a small cancer cluster of rhabdomyosarcoma, or RMS. While looking at the RMS cases, the state also identified “a small excess of pediatric lung cancer cases,” all of which “were of a single rare type called pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB).”
In 2017, no common exposures were found linking the cancers according to DHS. "State Epidemiologist Benjamin Chan acknowledged there were seven brain or central nervous system pediatric cancers detected in the towns of Rye, New Castle, Portsmouth, Greenland and North Hampton during a period when they expected to see 3.1. He determined this did not represent another cancer cluster because the cancers were different types of brain cancers."
Dr. Tom Sherman, a former state representative from Rye who chaired the Seacoast Pediatric Cancer Cluster formed by then-Gov. Maggie Hassan said he believes, “it’s a complete mistake to feel terribly reassured by anything we’ve learned so far.” Many NH parents of children diagnosed with cancer strongly believe there may be an unknown environmental cause that is triggering the illness. “The lack of knowledge does not equate to safety,” Sherman said.
Research was done by the task force committee that was established by then-Governor Maggie Hassan. Contamination was found leaching from a 27-acre Superfund cleanup site in North Hampton and Greenland, named Coakley Landfill, which raised serious concerns by the task force.
"Tests done on wells at the landfill have found PFAS chemicals and 1,4-dioxane - both suspected carcinogens - at levels above the Environmental Protection Agency’s health advisory levels. PFAS chemicals in Berry’s Brook at the edge of the dump tested dramatically higher than the EPA’s health advisory levels.
State Rep. Mindi Messmer, D-Rye, who chaired a subcommittee on the landfill, noted during a recent interview that the Coakley landfill “lies geographically right smack in the middle of this cancer cluster.”
Nearby residential wells and wells at golf courses have pulled the water from under the landfill’s cap, Messmer said.
“We found that these PFCs were contaminating the water in the landfill and migrating into other areas in the towns of North Hampton, Hampton, Rye and Greenland,” Messmer said. “That’s why we’re investigating it.”
Studies on PFAS chemicals have determined they could also cause low birth weights, harm a child’s development and increase cholesterol, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry."
"Messmer said she’s learned about four cases of adult RMS in the Rye area. “That’s highly unusually that adults will get RMS,” she said. She’s also learned about two adult onset cases of RMS in Merrimack."
"She said there have been "no new diagnoses of pediatric RMS or PPB in the 10-town Seacoast area” since the initial confirmation of the cancer cluster."
“Additionally, to date, no connection has been identified between the Seacoast pediatric cancer cluster and an environmental exposure, including the Coakley landfill,” she said. There were 2 cases where "the common thread is PFCs in water and that concerns me," Messmer said.
A Rye teenager Dylan Carpenter, was diagnosed with RMS in February 2014. His parents are Mimi Loureiro and Steven Carpenter.
Mimi Loureiro posted on the Love for the Carpenters Facebook page, about her son’s ongoing battle with cancer. In one post, she said, “Dylan’s “pseudo-remission” lasted three blissful months in which he was able to gain some weight and have some fun.”
“But then in December, scans showed that the tumors were again active,” she said.
In more recent post, she then said, Feb. 17 was the fourth anniversary of her son’s diagnosis.
“We are all in this for a long time. We need to find the light, the love, the beauty in as much as we can,” she said. “But, the truth is, some of this is just really ugly, uncomfortable, painful, and just plain awful.”
"It’s because of Dylan Carpenter and the other Seacoast children who have been diagnosed with cancer that it’s so important to investigate and try to remediate any environmental threats, including the Coakley landfill, Sherman said.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORIES HAD NEVER EQUALLED CDC HEALTH RECOMMENDATIONS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE AND STILL DOESN'T
(CDC)- Center for Disease Control
(EPA)-Environmental Protection Agency
(PPT)- Parts Per Trillion
_____________________________________________ _ ______________
Compare Each
Recommendations, PPT AMOUNT PPT AMOUNT
_Advisories to limits__ PFOA PFO's _____
“Additionally, to date, no connection has been identified between the Seacoast pediatric cancer cluster and an environmental exposure, including the Coakley landfill,” she said. There were 2 cases where "the common thread is PFCs in water and that concerns me," Messmer said.
A Rye teenager Dylan Carpenter, was diagnosed with RMS in February 2014. His parents are Mimi Loureiro and Steven Carpenter.
Mimi Loureiro posted on the Love for the Carpenters Facebook page, about her son’s ongoing battle with cancer. In one post, she said, “Dylan’s “pseudo-remission” lasted three blissful months in which he was able to gain some weight and have some fun.”
“But then in December, scans showed that the tumors were again active,” she said.
In more recent post, she then said, Feb. 17 was the fourth anniversary of her son’s diagnosis.
“We are all in this for a long time. We need to find the light, the love, the beauty in as much as we can,” she said. “But, the truth is, some of this is just really ugly, uncomfortable, painful, and just plain awful.”
"It’s because of Dylan Carpenter and the other Seacoast children who have been diagnosed with cancer that it’s so important to investigate and try to remediate any environmental threats, including the Coakley landfill, Sherman said.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORIES HAD NEVER EQUALLED CDC HEALTH RECOMMENDATIONS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE AND STILL DOESN'T
(CDC)- Center for Disease Control
(EPA)-Environmental Protection Agency
(PPT)- Parts Per Trillion
_____________________________________________ _ ______________
Compare Each
Recommendations, PPT AMOUNT PPT AMOUNT
_Advisories to limits__ PFOA PFO's _____
CDC Recommendation 11 PPT 7.4 PPT
EPA Advisory 70 PPT 70 PPT
New Jersey Limits Are 14 PPT 13 PPT
Vermont Limits Are 20 PPT 20 PPT
NH + Maine Limits Are 70 PPT 70 PPT
EPA Advisory 70 PPT 70 PPT
New Jersey Limits Are 14 PPT 13 PPT
Vermont Limits Are 20 PPT 20 PPT
NH + Maine Limits Are 70 PPT 70 PPT
CANCER CLUSTER THREATENS ANDOVER, NH
In 2014, there was also another analysis done on a potential cancer cluster concern in Andover, NH that was "prepared by GM Monawar Hasain MD PHD, The NH Department of Human and Health Services, Data Management, and NH State Cancer Registry."
It stated that The NH State Cancer Registry received a perceived elevated cancer incidence concern for Andover NH on August 1, 2012. The report stated, "After Discussion with individuals reporting the concern, it was determined that the concern did not meet the base criteria to initiate a cancer cluster investigation and no specific environmental exposures could be identified (though general concerns regarding community water system was expressed). Therefore a formal detailed cancer cluster investigation was not initiated...Additionally, after review of the water quality data, we found no evidence of regulatory violations in the community water system serving Andover Village."
The analysis also reported that, "It has been further estimated that there are approximately 72,000 persons living in NH (2014) with even more cancer cases now. Overall in NH, cancer incidences and mortality has been decreasing over the last several years." However, the truthful facts are according to the American Cancer Society stating there would be an estimated 41,570 new cancer cases in NH between 2011-2015. But according to the CDC, they were actually only 40,032 new cases in NH during that time period.
The analysis also reported that, "It has been further estimated that there are approximately 72,000 persons living in NH (2014) with even more cancer cases now. Overall in NH, cancer incidences and mortality has been decreasing over the last several years." However, the truthful facts are according to the American Cancer Society stating there would be an estimated 41,570 new cancer cases in NH between 2011-2015. But according to the CDC, they were actually only 40,032 new cases in NH during that time period.
The Estimated Number Of (All Cancer Sites) New Cancer Cases In NH Per Year
Reported By The American Cancer Society are shown below
Estimated Number of Estimated Number of
Year New NH Cancer Cases Year New NH Cancer Cases
2006 6,470 2012 8,350
2007 7,140 2013 8,470
2008 7,030 2014 8,450
2009 7,630 2015 8,090
2010 7,840 2016 8,680
2011 8,210 2017 8,670
For a 12 year period alone there was an estimated total of 95,030 new cancer cases estimated in NH by the American Cancer Society.
CANCER CLUSTER IN MERRMACK, NH
Another cancer incident has now also been reported for Merrimack, NH in January 2018. The report stated, "In February 2016 low levels of PFOA, approximately 30 parts per trillion (ppt), were found in tap water supplied by the Merrimack Village District (MVD) public water system. A subsequent investigation into environmental contamination surrounding the Saint-Gobain plant led to findings of drinking water contamination in private and public water supply wells in the surrounding communities. The current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (US EPA) lifetime Health Advisory for PFOA levels in drinking water is for PFOA and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) levels combined to not exceed 70 ppt in drinking water (U.S. EPA 2016a). To date, levels of PFOA and PFOS combined in Key Findings.
"The Saint-Gobain plant has been operational since the 1980’s. It is not possible to know when contamination of the public drinking water supply began, or the past levels of contamination. Preliminary results of the NH DHHS MVD Community Exposure Assessment have shown that out of the 217 randomly selected residents on the MVD public water system who had their blood tested for various PFCs, only PFOA was found at higher levels than typically seen in the general U.S. population. This is consistent with the existence of a known source of PFOA exposure through drinking water ingestion."
"In February 2016 low levels of PFOA were detected in the Merrimack Valley District public water supply. Some studies have found associations between PFOA and certain types of cancer. More research is needed to determine whether PFOA causes cancer and what types of cancers it may cause. Cancers associated with PFOA were not found to be higher in Merrimack. The DHHS will continue to monitor rates of cancer in Merrimack NH."
"There have been two studies on the same Greenland Inuit population which found some associations between PFOA and breast cancer. The first study of Greenlandic Inuit women found that women with breast cancer had a higher PFOA level than women without breast cancer, but this difference was not statistically significant when other exposures that could potentially cause cancer were taken into account (Bonefeld-Jorgensen et al. 2011)."
"A follow-up study on the same population of Greenlandic Inuit women found some associations between breast cancer and higher blood levels of some PFCs, including PFOA (Wielsøe1 et al. 2017). Despite these two studies, multiple other studies of PFOA workers exposed to high levels of PFOA (Gilliand and Mandel 1993; Leonard et al. 2008; Lundin et al. 2009; Steenland and Woskie 2012; Raleigh et al. 2014) and communities exposed to lower levels have found no connection between PFOA and breast cancer (Vieira et al. 2013; Barry et al. 2013; BonefeldJorgensen et al. 2014). There is very limited or no evidence for PFOA being connected with any other cancer."
Between 2005 to 2014 Merrimack NH had a population between 25,604 to 26,660 people. Within a 9 year period, 1,331 people were diagnosed with cancer just in Merrimack, NH alone.
______________________________________________________
Oral Cavity and Pharynx 28 33 Not significantly different
Esophagus 20 18 Not significantly different
Stomach 13 14 Not significantly different
Colorectal 115 101 Not significantly different
Liver and Intrahepatic 12 15 Not significantly different
Pancreas 30 30 Not significantly different
Gall Bladder 5 5 Not significantly different
Larynx 9 10 Not significantly different
Lung and Bronchus* 138 152 Not significantly different Mesothelioma 6 5 Not significantly different
Females Only:
Breast 197 203 Not significantly different Cervical 5 8 Not significantly different Uterus 55 49 Not significantly different Ovary 17 18 Not significantly different
Males Only:
Prostate* 198 173 Not significantly different Testis 8 9 Not significantly different
Bladder 79 68 Not significantly different
Kidney and Renal Pelvis 51 41 Not significantly different
Brain and Other CNS 22 20 Not significantly different Thyroid 52 41 Not significantly different
Hodgkin Lymphoma 5 8 Not significantly different
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma 48 54 Not significantly different
Kaposi Sarcoma 5 5 Not significantly different
Multiple Myeloma 14 15 Not significantly different
Leukemia 43 36 Not significantly different
Melanoma of Skin 61 75 Not significantly different
Other Cancers 95 95 Not significantly different
as of 2018, NH is now the No.1 state with the highest rate of breast cancer in the country. but has also yet again, define the source of cause as to why this is happening.
Reported on March 9, 2016, "Weitz and Luxenberg and Erin Brockovich broadened their investigation into regional water contamination, announcing they will begin looking into the recent detection of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in the local drinking water of Merrimack, NH. The announcement comes after the consumer advocate and law firm started similar investigations in New York and Vermont.
“Almost every week a new community learns its drinking water is no longer safe,” said Erin Brockovich. “We have to put an end to this crisis, step up our investment into vital infrastructure and see a greater enforcement of the Safe Drinking Water Act.”
Representatives from the company Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics recently notified the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services that PFOA was detected in water samples taken from four water faucets within its Merrimack facility, which is served by the Merrimack Village District Water System. Chronic PFOA exposure has been linked to testicular cancer, kidney cancer, thyroid disease, high cholesterol, ulcerative colitis and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Studies suggest other health consequences include a possible connection to pancreatic cancer.
“It is tragic to see yet another community impacted by PFOA contamination,” said Robin Greenwald, head of the Environmental and Consumer Protection Unit at Weitz and Luxenberg. “We have decided to expand the scope of our drinking water investigation to understand the health risks to residents of Merrimack and provide the community with robust legal options. And, once again, as in Hoosick Falls, NY, St. Gobain appears to be the entity responsible for the contamination.”
Ms. Brockovich and Weitz and Luxenberg recently filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. and Honeywell International Inc. on behalf of Hoosick Falls, NY residents who have been drinking water contaminated by PFOA. The case was filed after local residents reported falling ill after drinking and cooking with this water.
In addition, Ms. Brockovich and Weitz and Luxenberg recently announced an investigation into suspected causes and consequences of PFOA water contamination affecting Petersburgh, NY, and North Bennington, VT."
Between 2005 to 2014 Merrimack NH had a population between 25,604 to 26,660 people. Within a 9 year period, 1,331 people were diagnosed with cancer just in Merrimack, NH alone.
______________________________________________________
Merrimack, NH Significant Was Was
Cancer Type/Site Observed Expected Difference Oral Cavity and Pharynx 28 33 Not significantly different
Esophagus 20 18 Not significantly different
Stomach 13 14 Not significantly different
Colorectal 115 101 Not significantly different
Liver and Intrahepatic 12 15 Not significantly different
Pancreas 30 30 Not significantly different
Gall Bladder 5 5 Not significantly different
Larynx 9 10 Not significantly different
Lung and Bronchus* 138 152 Not significantly different Mesothelioma 6 5 Not significantly different
Females Only:
Breast 197 203 Not significantly different Cervical 5 8 Not significantly different Uterus 55 49 Not significantly different Ovary 17 18 Not significantly different
Males Only:
Prostate* 198 173 Not significantly different Testis 8 9 Not significantly different
Bladder 79 68 Not significantly different
Kidney and Renal Pelvis 51 41 Not significantly different
Brain and Other CNS 22 20 Not significantly different Thyroid 52 41 Not significantly different
Hodgkin Lymphoma 5 8 Not significantly different
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma 48 54 Not significantly different
Kaposi Sarcoma 5 5 Not significantly different
Multiple Myeloma 14 15 Not significantly different
Leukemia 43 36 Not significantly different
Melanoma of Skin 61 75 Not significantly different
Other Cancers 95 95 Not significantly different
as of 2018, NH is now the No.1 state with the highest rate of breast cancer in the country. but has also yet again, define the source of cause as to why this is happening.
Reported on March 9, 2016, "Weitz and Luxenberg and Erin Brockovich broadened their investigation into regional water contamination, announcing they will begin looking into the recent detection of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in the local drinking water of Merrimack, NH. The announcement comes after the consumer advocate and law firm started similar investigations in New York and Vermont.
“Almost every week a new community learns its drinking water is no longer safe,” said Erin Brockovich. “We have to put an end to this crisis, step up our investment into vital infrastructure and see a greater enforcement of the Safe Drinking Water Act.”
Representatives from the company Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics recently notified the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services that PFOA was detected in water samples taken from four water faucets within its Merrimack facility, which is served by the Merrimack Village District Water System. Chronic PFOA exposure has been linked to testicular cancer, kidney cancer, thyroid disease, high cholesterol, ulcerative colitis and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Studies suggest other health consequences include a possible connection to pancreatic cancer.
“It is tragic to see yet another community impacted by PFOA contamination,” said Robin Greenwald, head of the Environmental and Consumer Protection Unit at Weitz and Luxenberg. “We have decided to expand the scope of our drinking water investigation to understand the health risks to residents of Merrimack and provide the community with robust legal options. And, once again, as in Hoosick Falls, NY, St. Gobain appears to be the entity responsible for the contamination.”
Ms. Brockovich and Weitz and Luxenberg recently filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. and Honeywell International Inc. on behalf of Hoosick Falls, NY residents who have been drinking water contaminated by PFOA. The case was filed after local residents reported falling ill after drinking and cooking with this water.
In addition, Ms. Brockovich and Weitz and Luxenberg recently announced an investigation into suspected causes and consequences of PFOA water contamination affecting Petersburgh, NY, and North Bennington, VT."
While all of this is happening, NH Governor, Chris Sununu already clearly gave us NH government's opinion on these current issues in his February 15, 2018 State Of The State Address:
"As we look back on this past year and recognize our milestones and achievements, we cannot lose sight of New Hampshire's future."
GOD PLEASE HELP US ALL
Well at lest we now have an idea where NH drug dens are actually located throughout the statehouse in NH. But please lets not forget the homeless crisis, opioid addiction crisis, and the lack of mental healthcare crisis that continues to still dominate a domino effect of a never ending increase to NH's 'suicide crisis' now still continuing throughout the state now for the past 3 decades. Which is now another whole saga and chapter alone in NH. And NH's government's repeated excuses are that all of this is? Well, "these problems exist throughout the rest of the entire country!" So if NH's government clearly tells everyone to suddenly drive off a cliff tomorrow, just because the entire country is now doing it, apparently you will now clearly understand why and where it came from, the NH government.
To truly show how consciencous NH's government really pays attention towards the state's problems, while in serious crisis mode, NH even attempted on 3 different occasions to now numb the voters to their existing problems by voting to lower the drinking age to 18 while all of these issues still remained in a negative progression still even 3 decades later. Not just only once, not even just twice, but 3 individual times and thankfully by the grace of god they failed each time. NH continues to have multiple addiction crisis plans and mental healthcare plans one right after another that quickly tends to only immediately fail early on in the process.
In 2006, NH came up with another poor plan to end homelessness. This one was arrogantly titled the "ten year plan to end homelessness in NH," that drastically once again began to fail just 2 years into it. Gee, was this idea from the rest of the country too? In 2008, in Manchester alone, the 10 year plan defined 1,500 as homeless, for which 400 were children alone. Then 10 years later over 1,700 people had to be treated by the city of Manchester's $1.5 million healthcare program for the homeless. "Elissa Margolin of Housing Action NH contends that the state needs to do more to increase the supply of affordable housing."
"According to Margolin, Vermont has bonded $35 million in addition to another $10 million a year later. Maine bonded $50 million in 2010, and every year had committed between $6 million and $12 million to affordable housing. And Massachusetts bonded $1 billion over 5 years. "We (NH) came in with the chamber of commerce and asked for $25 million and only got $2.5 million."
Business Insider combined six measures of labor-market and general economic health for all the states and the District of Columbia. By putting all those on a common scale and combining them, they came up with an overall score for each state's economy. Now because NH refuses to pay their promises, debts and needs to the state for the past 50 years. In a state where the average weekly wages declined 1.2% between August 2017 and August 2018. Now has become the third-worst rated economy among the 50 states and DC.
When your state's government becomes well known through the united States Justice Department only for bootlegging liquor to continue to very poorly and illegally rob Peter to pay Paul, just to continue to keep running from bill collectors, for repeatedly making broken promises, while breaking more than just one law in the process; exactly what else would the final outcome be of the domino games that NH continues to play?
Just FYI: NH state law does require municipalities to help people who are destitute. Including those who are otherwise unable to obtain shelter. Not that any actual law in NH state would actually be enforced by the government itself. However, while the NH Supreme Court recklessly continues to write, inflict, and enforce, non existing laws and illegal rules that only continue to break actual NH state laws, then you can surely most certainly not expect, anything less or better from the rest of NH's entire government. If I can clearly find and see these problems with a brain injury that was only purposely inflicted by the state of NH's government's own stupidity, then what the hell is their excuse now!?!?!?!?!?!
