BROSOR V BROSOR
Superior Criminal Court Judge William J. Groff now presides over Family Court cases because of his lack of proficiency in Criminal Court cases. However he now proves why in one Family Court Case alone, how NH Judges and Marital Masters such as himself, are now the cause for NH State House Representatives, having to now form a Redress Grievance Committee all because the NH Judiciary Conduct Committee, along with the NH Bar Association, have now proven incapable of performing all their required duties!
The request for removal of the following 3 NH judicial chairs were made to no avail, but are only just the beginning. HA1, requests the removal of Marital Master Micheal Gardner in Laconia, NH, from his said office. HA2, requests the removal of District Court Judge Lucinda Sadler in Derry, NH, from her said office. And finally, HA3, requests the removal of Marital Master Philip Cross in Derry, NH, from his said office.
It took 4 months to schedule my Relief Hearing in November 2007, that I requested in July, from an ongoing divorce. The so called Infamous ?Honorable? Criminal Court Judge, William Groff, was presiding over my proceedings and not a marital master. It also just so happens coincidentally that my ex husband's attorney, Richard C. Follender, is also a criminal defense attorney! For the record, Attorney Richard C. Follender has made it perfectly clear since publication of this blog (Just another little coincidence!), that "he no longer Presently Represents Roger R. Brosor and I should contact Roger directly!" Gee, no surprise there once you hear the rest!
When our case was the first case called in alphabetical order, Judge Groff suddenly told his court clerk "no" and our file immediately went to the bottom of the pile. It was clear that criminal cases took precedence for this bias judge over domestic. Though when finally our case was his last case called, this bias Judge suddenly then decides to tell us that "HE" does not have the 30 minutes the court scheduled to hear our case. He said, "I can only give you 15 minutes, I'll just cut you off when your time is up, so take it or leave it!!!" When my attorney corrected him and told him that the court documents clearly stated 30 minutes was scheduled to hear our case, Judge Groff responded with, "WELL 'I' DON'T HAVE IT!!!" Kinda like when Judge Paul Moore in Derry, NH, is confronted in court, and told "BY LAW", he has to state when asked, "what law is he basing his ruling on?", and he just simply says, "I DON'T HAVE TO TELL YOU!!!", all because there is no law that would support his ruling in the first place!!! This is what "Absolute Immunity" gives you in NH's Courtrooms!
Judge Groff now freely abuses his authority, and refuses to even do his job legally, to even follow what the courts ordered in the first place. Remember, "Absolute Immunity" gives all NH Judges legal rights to "SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, AND ABOVE ALL SPEAK NO EVIL!" I was now forced to take my chances out of desperation and above all my needs. Are we even beginning to see a glimmer of the big picture here yet? This is NH's Mafia Judicial System at its finest, performing NH's 21st centuries version of martial law! Shall we continue?
Well for the record, I phoned and spoke with the NH Judiciary Conduct Committee and the NH Bar Association and was pragmatically told by both, "It really sounds like you have no case and are just upset with him!" Well we now know why NH judges and attorneys feel free to NOT FOLLOW THE LAW! I received their message loud and clear. THEY ARE JUST ANOTHER NH USELESS COMMITTEE OF PEOPLE, proving quite "The Complete Little NH Mafia" we now have!
The following shows how Judge William J. Groff and Attorney Richard C. Follender break laws, and practice the art of "Dirty Divorce" instead of following and enforcing NH law! These 2 actually make characters like Judge "Harry T. Stone and Prosecutor Dan Fielding from the television show "Night Court" look like the real thing! Hell, all their missing is a 6' 6" bald bailiff called "BULL!"
As you read the following keep in mind that Judge Groff never once asked Attorney Follender, "What evidence do you have to prove this?" Though when my attorney flat out told Judge Groff the following statements made by Attorney Follender were lies, only then did he ask this question! She informed him that we have a Private Investigators Report. He now suddenly avoids and never wants to see the evidence that he has just requested! Remember, he only has 15 minutes to spare to make a small attempt to properly and legally do his job!
I really couldn't tell which one perjured themselves worse over the other, Laurel (My Ex ) or Hardy (Attorney Follender!). And now we also have Judge Groff performing Charlie Chaplin behind the bench, obviously hating to do any homework before even entering a courtroom to realize "Who's On First!"
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
* At this November 29, 2007 Relief Hearing, my ex husband's attorney, Richard C. Follender, told Judge Groff, "MY CLIENT IS AN "HONEST", HARD WORKING, QUIET, MEEK DEMEANOR KIND OF GUY WHO JUST WANTS THIS DIVORCE OVER WITH AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!"
FACT 1: Yet, Attorney Follender found out in October 2007, that my ex husband, his client, admitted to a Nashua police officer, that he lied to his own attorney and I, about already constantly coming to the house while I was at work, and taking things without my permission. Having several chances to do so, he still never once packed or took any of his own clothes. He shopped for a complete whole new wardrobe at several places! One purchase alone was $500 at MEN'S WAREHOUSE in Manchester, NH!
*It is trespassing when a spouse no longer resides at the marital homestead, enters the property without the other spouse's permission, who is residing in the marital homestead. It is the same as a landlord requiring to inform, request permission, from their tenant, when they will be entering the property on a specific date and time. Because NH is a 50/50 state, any and all property, personal or otherwise, that is removed from the residence must be agreed upon by both parties!
FACT 2: Yet, my ex husband, his client, also tampered with the evidence that Attorney Follender himself PURPOSELY WITHHELD, Obstructing Justice, until it would be safe to submit, after the infamous Judge Groff's final ruling. On my ex's Bank Statements submitted with his interrogatories, he whitened-out whom checks were written to, that totaled all together over $22,000 in unknown payments, for just a 9 month period alone!
FACT 3: Yet, Attorney Follender had to find out at this Relief Hearing that I hired a private investigator, which my ex husband, his client, found out and was aware of since July 2007.
FACT 4: Yet, during Trial in April 2009, my ex husband, his client, confesses to illegally tape recording me FOR MONTHS without my knowledge or permission in a 2 party state, which Attorney Follender had his client plead the fifth amendment to on his interrogatories, but then confess to it in a court of law!
FACT 5: Yet, during trial in April 2009, the courts heard testimony proving my ex husband, his client, committed Contempt of Court, when he chose to come on to the property without my permission first, that he was court ordered off of, by Judge Groff himself. Remember, there was no dispute whatsoever to these facts from either my ex husband or Attorney Follender!
FACT 5: Yet, during trial in April 2009, the courts heard testimony proving my ex husband, his client, committed Contempt of Court, when he chose to come on to the property without my permission first, that he was court ordered off of, by Judge Groff himself. Remember, there was no dispute whatsoever to these facts from either my ex husband or Attorney Follender!
FACT 6: Yet during trial in April 2009, Attorney Follender did not even make it through his second question to his own client, my ex, who was the first witness to take the stand, when Marital Master Love told Attorney Follender, "He's a hostile witness, treat him as such!"
FACT 7: Yet, his client's strongest witness testimony was someone speaking nothing more than strictly hearsay for the dead, who could not be questioned, about what they told this witness themselves! How convenient! Only a NH Criminal Court Attorney in a NH Courtroom could pull this one off!
FACT 8: Yet, his client fraudulently continued to use the marital homestead's address as his own residence while living in another county with his "Sugar Baby." He continued to do this even after the homestead was sold, and even after the divorce was finalized! He even continued to fraudulently use the homestead's address as his return address on all alimony payments.
Forgery and Fraudulent Practices Generally
Section 638:3
FACT 7: Yet, his client's strongest witness testimony was someone speaking nothing more than strictly hearsay for the dead, who could not be questioned, about what they told this witness themselves! How convenient! Only a NH Criminal Court Attorney in a NH Courtroom could pull this one off!
FACT 8: Yet, his client fraudulently continued to use the marital homestead's address as his own residence while living in another county with his "Sugar Baby." He continued to do this even after the homestead was sold, and even after the divorce was finalized! He even continued to fraudulently use the homestead's address as his return address on all alimony payments.
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
New Hampshire Statutes
TITLE LXII
CRIMINAL CODE
TITLE LXII
CRIMINAL CODE
CHAPTER 641
FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
Section 641:1
"641:1 Perjury. –
(a) He makes a false material statement under oath or affirmation, or swears or affirms the truth of a material statement previously made, and he does not believe the statement to be true; or
(b) He makes inconsistent material statements under oath or affirmation, both within the period of limitations, one of which is false and not believed by him to be true. In a prosecution under this section, it need not be alleged or proved which of the statements is false but only that one or the other was false and not believed by the defendant to be true.
II. "Official proceeding'' means any proceeding before a legislative, judicial, administrative or other governmental body or official authorized by law to take evidence under oath or affirmation including a notary or other person taking evidence in connection with any such proceeding. "Material'' means capable of affecting the course or outcome of the proceeding. A statement is not material if it is retracted in the course of the official proceeding in which it was made before it became manifest that the falsification was or would be exposed and before it substantially affected the proceeding. Whether a statement is material is a question of law to be determined by the court.
Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973."
(a) He makes a false material statement under oath or affirmation, or swears or affirms the truth of a material statement previously made, and he does not believe the statement to be true; or
(b) He makes inconsistent material statements under oath or affirmation, both within the period of limitations, one of which is false and not believed by him to be true. In a prosecution under this section, it need not be alleged or proved which of the statements is false but only that one or the other was false and not believed by the defendant to be true.
II. "Official proceeding'' means any proceeding before a legislative, judicial, administrative or other governmental body or official authorized by law to take evidence under oath or affirmation including a notary or other person taking evidence in connection with any such proceeding. "Material'' means capable of affecting the course or outcome of the proceeding. A statement is not material if it is retracted in the course of the official proceeding in which it was made before it became manifest that the falsification was or would be exposed and before it substantially affected the proceeding. Whether a statement is material is a question of law to be determined by the court.
Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973."
New Hampshire Statutes
TITLE LXII
CRIMINAL CODE
CHAPTER 638
FRAUD
CRIMINAL CODE
CHAPTER 638
FRAUD
"638:3 Tampering With Public or Private Records. – A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if, knowing he has no privilege to do so, he falsifies, destroys, removes or conceals any writing or record, public or private, with a purpose to deceive or injure anyone or to conceal any wrongdoing.
18 U.S.C. § 1505 : US Code - Section 1505: Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
"Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress -Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both."
18 U.S.C. § 1621 : US Code - Section 1621: Perjury generally
"Whoever -
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."
2010 New Hampshire Statutes
TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE
CHAPTER 625 PRELIMINARY
Section 625:8 Limitations.
TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE
CHAPTER 625 PRELIMINARY
Section 625:8 Limitations.
625:8 Limitations. –
I. Except as otherwise provided in this section, prosecutions are subject to the following periods of limitations:
(a) For a class A felony, 6 years;
(b) For a class B felony, 6 years;
(c) For a misdemeanor, one year;
(d) For a violation, 3 months.
(e) For an offense defined by RSA 282-A, 6 years.
II. Murder may be prosecuted at any time.
II-a. [Repealed.]
I. Except as otherwise provided in this section, prosecutions are subject to the following periods of limitations:
(a) For a class A felony, 6 years;
(b) For a class B felony, 6 years;
(c) For a misdemeanor, one year;
(d) For a violation, 3 months.
(e) For an offense defined by RSA 282-A, 6 years.
II. Murder may be prosecuted at any time.
II-a. [Repealed.]
*Attorney Follender then tells Judge Groff, my ex husband was, "HOMELESS AND MOVING FROM HOUSE TO HOUSE BETWEEN FAMILY AND FRIENDS." at this November 29, 2007 Relief Hearing!...AA AW...IT'S JUST ALL SO SAD!...Could someone please hand me a tissue!
FACT 9: Yet, my ex husband shortly after this hearing, finally submits 3 months late, his interrogatories through Attorney Follender, that he answered under oath. On them, he stated that he moved in with his "Sugar Baby" in "November 2007", which now proves he was already living with his "Sugar Baby" at the time of the Relief Hearing. Thus now proving both he and Attorney Follender perjured themselves under oath before Judge Groff, obviously with his permission of course, in a court of law.
Attorney Follender withheld his clients interrogatories until after the Relief Hearing, making them 3 months overdue, while now purposely placing his own client, not once but twice, in the position of ONCE AGAIN, Contempt of Court, while he himself now performs the deed called Obstruction of Justice!
You'll really going to get a kick out of this one! Attorney Richard C. Follender had the audacity to threaten me, to postpone the scheduled trial date, just because he sends me a second set of interrogatories too close to trial to answer. I refused to return them back to him in no less time than the thirty days required by law. He actually had to be reminded that I was still waiting for him, for once, to submit his own clients 3rd set within the required 30 days by law instead of 3 months later!
You see, he purposely withheld the first 2 because his clients answers proved everything out of Attorney Follender's mouth at the Relief Hearing, before Judge Groff, was one of the largest piles of B.S. that ever hit the American Judicial Fan, which Judge Groff was ACTUALLY willing to digest in just 7 1/2 minutes!
He now places his client in the position of contempt of court twice, WHILE NOW, along with his client, also commits multiple perjury, while both now simultaneously commit Obstruction OF Justice! All graciously permitted by the one and only, infamous SUPERIOR Criminal Court Judge Groff! Attorney Follender also suffers from amnesia when it comes to NH Rule 8.4.MISCONDUCT, UNDER THE NH RULES OF CONDUCT! But then again, only with the infamous SUPERIOR Criminal Court Judge Groff's assistance of course!
NH RULE 8.4. MISCONDUCT
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
NH RULE 8.4. MISCONDUCT
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
(ATTORNEY FOLLENDER'S BATTING AVERAGE IS A STRONG 100% IN (B) & (C), WHICH THE NH BAR ASSOCIATION BASICALLY PROUDLY SAYS, IN SO MANY HIDDEN WORDS,...THAT'S OUR BOY!!!) Seriously, do you really still need to ask why NH State House Representatives had to form a Redress Grievance Committee?
(d) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official;
(e) state or imply an ability to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law.
My God Richard, you really should learn to at least open and look at your clients case file once in a while. THAT IS UNLESS YOU PREFER CONSTANTLY SUFFERING THE OPEN MOUTH INSERT FOOT SYNDROME. Seriously, I was waiting to hear next, "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!" But then again O.J. Simpson would be free on the streets today had NH's infamous SUPERIOR Criminal Court Judge Groff presided over his last trial! There is even more evidence to prove this, now isn't that right boys!?! Shall we continue? Oh I say let's!
FACT 10: Yet, now during trial in April 2009, my ex husband now testifies, after reading my private investigator's report, to moving in with his "Sugar Baby" in "August 2007", which now proves once again he perjured himself under oath in his interrogatories along with when he and Attorney Follender perjured themselves under oath, at the November Relief Hearing, that once again, was only completely permitted by Judge Groff! Hopefully you can still follow the sick jokes these people actually played and made out of my life, because I'm beginning to have trouble keeping up with Laurel and Hardy, and Charlie Chaplin myself!
*Attorney Follender then follows it up by telling Judge Groff that his client, "COULD NOT EVEN AFFORD HIS OWN PLACE ALONG WITH THE HOMESTEADS EXPENSES, LET ALONE NOW PAY ALIMONY! THEREFORE REQUESTS JUDGE GROFF TO (illegitimately of course!) COURT ORDER THE SALE OF THE HOUSE!"...AAA AW...The poor thing...OOOOH...What the hell, just pass me the whole box!
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
*Attorney Follender then follows it up by telling Judge Groff that his client, "COULD NOT EVEN AFFORD HIS OWN PLACE ALONG WITH THE HOMESTEADS EXPENSES, LET ALONE NOW PAY ALIMONY! THEREFORE REQUESTS JUDGE GROFF TO (illegitimately of course!) COURT ORDER THE SALE OF THE HOUSE!"...AAA AW...The poor thing...OOOOH...What the hell, just pass me the whole box!
NH RSA 458:16 TEMPORARY RELIEF AND PERMANENT RESTRAINING ORDER LAW
SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (H): "Ordering the sale of the house of the marital residence provided that both parties have filed a written stipulation with the clerk, explicitly agreeing on the sale of the property prior to the final hearing on merits. (OOPS! Another contradicting back door law!) If the parties have not so stipulated, the sale of the marital residence shall not be ordered prior to the final hearing as long as the court deems the party residing within the marital residence to have sufficient financial resources to pay the debts or obligations generated by the property, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and ordinary maintenance, as those debts and obligations come due." NH now releases a guilty spouse who still owns 50% from any financial responsibility, before the divorce has even gone to trial! Boy, now theres an "EQUITABLE STATE" for you! That's the "Live Free Or Die" way!
FACT 11: Yet, his client, my ex husband's payroll stubs, along with his bank statements submitted through his delinquent interrogatories by Attorney Follender, showed him withdrawing and draining for over the past several years, his 401K Plan, that was acquired only throughout the marriage.
FACT 12: These same payroll stubs from the same company, also showed year end gross incomes $5,000-$10,000 OVER his present yearly gross income he submitted to the courts. The very same payroll stubs that Judge Groff avoided, ignored, and completely refused to see, because he couldn't Taste, Smoke, Feel, or Sniff them, in the 7 1/2 minutes he gives himself, to digest your side of the case put before him! Whoever said illiterates graduating high school could never make something of themselves? NH's very own SUPERIOR Criminal Court Judge, William J. Groff, has clearly proven otherwise!
FACT 12: These same payroll stubs from the same company, also showed year end gross incomes $5,000-$10,000 OVER his present yearly gross income he submitted to the courts. The very same payroll stubs that Judge Groff avoided, ignored, and completely refused to see, because he couldn't Taste, Smoke, Feel, or Sniff them, in the 7 1/2 minutes he gives himself, to digest your side of the case put before him! Whoever said illiterates graduating high school could never make something of themselves? NH's very own SUPERIOR Criminal Court Judge, William J. Groff, has clearly proven otherwise!
FACT 13: Yet at trial in April 2009, we submitted his bank account records that I received from Attorney Follender himself, showing balances of 5 digit figures of thousands and thousands of dollars, along with a cash flow for a 9 month period alone, that totaled $7,000, ONCE AGAIN...YUP, YOU GOT IT!..OVER HIS YEARLY GROSS INCOME HE SUBMITTED TO THE COURTS!
FACT 14: Yet these same bank statements that I received from Attorney Follender, showed his client my ex, paying his co-worker and his "Sugar Baby's" mortgage and utilities along with ours simultaneously.
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
FACT 14: Yet these same bank statements that I received from Attorney Follender, showed his client my ex, paying his co-worker and his "Sugar Baby's" mortgage and utilities along with ours simultaneously.
FACT 15: Yet again, lets not forget these same bank statements I received from Attorney Follender himself, showed that his client clearly tampered with them, whiting-out the descriptions for over $22,000 for unknown payments/purchases in just a 9 month period alone.
FACT 16: Yet these same bank statements that I received from Attorney Follender, showed his client purchased 5 cell phones + a new contract for his and his co-worker's "Sugar Baby" with 4 children, in August 2007. He Rented a cabin on Newfound Lake in September 2007. (He Refused to fix the brakes on my car in October 2007). He paid his "Sugar baby's" children's ski club $600.00 in November 2007, and last but never shall be the least, he purchased a $2,500 engagement ring (right after the Relief Hearing) for his "Sugar Baby" in December 2007, so he says. She was flashing an engagement ring at this November 2007 Relief Hearing held before Judge Groff. And let's not forget those legal fees he was also paying while now doing all of this!
FACT 17: Yet these same bank statements that I received from Attorney Follender, also showed woman's retail stores and catalog orders, restaurants and movie theatres, ski lodge reservations at Loon Mtn, Ragged Mtn, and Sunappee Mtn, along with reservation reward charges of $12.00 per month on his credit card. His Credit card showed for just a 12 month period alone, over $3,000 in car repairs at Ford and Nissan dealerships, for his "Sugar Baby's" Ford Expediton and Nissan Altima. His weekly grocery bill was $200-$300. He also received a letter confirming his agreement to pay Rockingham Christian Church $7,800. Nothing like trying to buy your way into heaven.
NH truly supports and gives a whole new meaning to the professional practice called "SUGAR DADDY" along with the professional practice called "SUGAR BABY!" The only thing left to do is, list it at the UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICE. You have a huge donation right off for one, and an easy income for the other!
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
NH truly supports and gives a whole new meaning to the professional practice called "SUGAR DADDY" along with the professional practice called "SUGAR BABY!" The only thing left to do is, list it at the UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICE. You have a huge donation right off for one, and an easy income for the other!
ONLY IN THE STATE OF NH FOLKS, ONLY IN NH!
NH RSA 458:16 TEMPORARY RELIEF AND PERMANENT RESTRAINING ORDER LAW
SECTION 1, PARAGRAPH (G) "Enjoining party from transferring, encumbering, hypothecating, concealing, or in any way disposing of any property, real or personal, except in the usual course of business, or for the necessities of life and if such order is directed against a party, it may require such party to notify the other party of any proposed extraordinary expenditures and to account to the court for all such extraordinary expenditures."
FACT 18: Yet the copies of his credit card records I received from Attorney Follender included photo copies of the payments/checks which showed proof of a bank account he purposely withheld and never listed or admitted to on his bank account information requested in his 1st set of interrogatories!
FACT 19: Yet, my many motions to reconsider were denied by Judge Groff because Attorney Richard C. Follender told the courts we were in discussion to permit me $10,000 from the house proceeds. What Attorney Follender purposely so kindly left out was, that it was only under the stipulation that my ex husband was permitted to have an additional $4,500 for himself! Remember NH Rule 8.4.(C)MISCONDUCT? Well, Hell would of frozen over before I would let that man steal one more dime!
FACT 20: AND YET, within 6 months after our divorce finalizes, and paying off attorney's fees, and now paying me alimony (only $45,000 divided by 5 yrs), he is now able to afford to marry his, and also his co-worker's professional "Sugar Baby", 24 hours after just being divorced, along with also affording a honeymoon. The icing on this wedding cake was that he also purchase a new home with an acre+ of land and a three car garage, once again, only with Judge Groff's blessings of course! Wow, there goes the cost of a present day NH Sugar Baby again! No wonder NH goes through so many HIV tests. There's no money left to purchase any condoms! What I want to know is, what the hell kind of Wedding Gift did MM Love, Attorney Follender, and the so-called Honorable Judge Groff, even give to the happy couple?
And did it even remotely come close to matching mine, illegally stolen and given by NH Courts against my will!!!!
I NEVER EVEN RECEIVED A SIMPLE THANK YOU CARD FROM THE NEWLYWEDS!
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
FACT 21: To think all of this was done on, and I QUOTE ATTORNEY RICHARD C. FOLLENDER'S OWN WORDS TO JUDGE GROFF, "HE ONLY MAKES AN ENGINEERING ASSISTANT'S SALARY, NOT AN ENGINEERS!" Then again, this all began with the one and only (I QUOTE ONCE AGAIN, THE MASTERFUL ATTORNEY FOLLENDER HIMSELF) "HONEST", HARD WORKING, QUIET, MEEK DEMEANOR KIND OF GUY," Roger R Brosor himself, who even went as far as to say in his interrogatories, "SHE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF MY MEEK DEMEANOR!" Where can one attorney produce and store this much manure, to be capable of continuously shoveling it to the courts as much as this one does? And above that, find a Judge who will actually digest it in just 7 1/2 minutes?
ONLY IN THE STATE OF NH FOLKS, ONLY IN NH!
Well, bravo and tootles to Attorney Richard C. Follender! He was actually able to get one out of three right! His client, along with himself I might add, was/is definitely "HARD WORKING," AT BEING BOLDFACE LIARS IN A COURT OF LAW!
BUT, then again we are talking about the same NH Criminal Defense Attorney, Richard C. Follender, who actually once stood in a courtroom and told a NH Criminal Court Judge in 2007...(BET YOU'LL NEVER GUESS WHO?) YUP, YOOOU GOT IT!..the one and only, NH's infamous Dishonorable SUPERIOR Criminal Court Judge William Groff, that a 1997 Felony A with 2 years parole could have been expunged a couple of years prior the present date, when in fact, BY LAW, it could not even be expunged for 2 more years! But then again we are only discussing just a couple of co-hort's in crime now aren't we!
This is also the same Criminal Defense Attorney, Richard C. Follender, who committed fraud and forced me to sign the transfer deed to our Timeshare, that only stated I was signing of my own free will, because it would not be acceptable, according to him that is, with me crossing that part out and notating that it was, "court ordered" in the divorce decree. If a court order is not even legally acceptable on a transfer deed, then what does it say for the court order to begin with? Their committing fraud! He then also charges 'ME' $450.00 to commit this fraud, and resend another transfer deed to be signed as is or, he will charge me with Contempt of Court! Remember NH's Rules 8.4. (A) and (C) Of Misconduct? Business must be slowing down, though gee, I couldn't even begin to tell you why?
WHICH NOW PROVES THAT BOTH NH GUMBALL MACHINES, THE NH JUDICIARY CONDUCT COMMITTEE AND NH BAR ASSOCIATION, TRULY NOW WILL SPIT OUT, BACK-UP, SUPPORT AND CERTIFY ANYTHING AS TOXIC AS THEY ARE THESE DAYS, NOW WONT THEY!...THE STATE OF NH WILL JUST NEVER CEASE TO AMAZE US!
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
WHICH NOW PROVES THAT BOTH NH GUMBALL MACHINES, THE NH JUDICIARY CONDUCT COMMITTEE AND NH BAR ASSOCIATION, TRULY NOW WILL SPIT OUT, BACK-UP, SUPPORT AND CERTIFY ANYTHING AS TOXIC AS THEY ARE THESE DAYS, NOW WONT THEY!...THE STATE OF NH WILL JUST NEVER CEASE TO AMAZE US!
SO IF ANYONE IS SEARCHING FOR A LYING, DISHONEST, DECEITFUL NH ATTORNEY WHO WILL COMMIT FRAUD AND WILLINGLY PARTICIPATE FULLY IN OBSTRUCTING ANY AND ALL LEGAL JUSTICE, THAT THE NH BAR ASSOCIATION FULLY SUPPORTS, THEN BY ALL MEANS, ATTORNEY RICHARD C. FOLLENDER AT 127 MAIN STREET, SUITE 7, NASHUA, NH, 03060, IS YOUR MAN! BUT REMEMBER, THIS BAD BOY's CRIMES COME WITH A HIGH PRICE TAG TO PAY! JUST ASK ROGER R. BROSOR!
AND IF YOU ARE TRULY IN NEED OF A NH CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE TO GO ALONG WITH SUCH CRIMES THAT THIS NH ATTORNEY IS MORE THAN WILLING TO COMMIT ON YOUR BEHALF, AND THAT NH's TOXIC JUDICIARY CONDUCT COMMITTEE FULLY SUPPORTS!!!....WELL....YOU KNOW WHO TO CALL!!! F.Y.I. It ain't GHOST BUSTERS!!!
OOPS! ANOTHER ONE RUNS FOR THE HILLS WITH PAY: IN APRIL 2010, 5 MONTHS AFTER THIS BLOG WAS PUBLISHED, (Just another little coincidence!) IT WAS ANNOUNCED BY THE NH BAR ASSOCIATION, THAT NH's SUPERIOR CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE WILLIAM J. GROFF IS NOW RETIRING! But no worries, NH has plenty more judges giving performances of Charlie Chaplin behind NH's courtroom benches just like him, throughout the whole state! At least we're soon to be minus one gumball from NH's Judicial Gumball Machine! Oh well, somebody please don't forget to take the key to the evidence room away from him on his way out! GOOD RIDDENS!
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
Now you truly know how NH'S INFAMOUS KANGAROO JUDICIAL SYSTEM 101 WORKS! this is how it causes MANY of the unnecessary expenses to our NH Welfare and Medicaid System, along with increasing the number of homeless families and individuals! So hopefully that bulb is not only turned on by now, but should actually be blinding you, but if not, this only just keeps getting better!
The infamous Charlie Chaplin (Judge Groff) told us in court that, "neither one of them can afford the house!" SERIOUSLY? Based on WHAT????? What Attorney Follender says? Then his final ruling was to illegitimately of course, court order the sale of my family home and inheritance based on no material or even circumstantial evidence to support his ruling!
This is also along with last but never shall be the least, Laurel and Hardy's shoveling Global Award and Oscar winning courtroom performance! He denies me temporary alimony and ONLY orders my ex husband off the property unless he received my permission first! All based on the one and only invisible evidence he was personally served on a silver platter by Attorney Richard C. Follender himself, that he was willing to digest in only 7 1/2 minutes! Judge Harry Stone from the television show "NIGHT COURT" never had an episode as bad as this!!!
NH Judges and Lawyers practice Perjury, Fraud. & Obstruction of Justice in NH Law!
This is my life being decided by a NH Superior Criminal Court Judge who never lived it and only willing to hear 7 1/2 minutes of it, all because he freely gives himself permission to cut the court ordered time, already scheduled to hear our case! He is then only willing to look at evidence that he can sniff, smoke, taste, or feel, that does not require the use of a calculator, or have to even be read! This is the same NH Superior Criminal Court Judge who has been breaking the same record time ruling on crime everyday for 18 years while now actually committing it himself! So gee NH, now how really safe are we?
Hmm, does our new found Senator, Kelly Ayotte, still want to brag, how tough she was on crime? And lets give credit where credit is due! We can't forget Governor lynch, Senator Shaheen, and the many NH State House Representatives who throughout many years, of hard work in political office, proudly helped support the NH Judicial System, that made NH's highest percent of homeless people, needing Welfare and Medicaid, what it is today!
Please give you opinions at HDIVORCELAWSAREBAD@gmail.com
Tweet
